Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridit Nimdia (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ridit Nimdia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:1EVENT, and anyways neither becoming youngest rated player nor beating a rated player at the youngest age should count notable.(Especially since FIDE has continually lowered the bar for entry). Also World School Chess Championship is not a proper World age-group or school Championship. It is only held every year in Turkey with people from Turkey, India or Central Asia winning it. One can see in the result page that often below 2000 rated players are 3rd or 4th even in U15 or U17 groups. Also Ridit is now 16 years old, he peaked at a rating of 1729 and is currently rated at 1561. Roller26 (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. As per nominator. Also, fails GNG.Knox490 (talk) 04:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 07:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per common sense, GNG and WP:NCHESS. Mere participation in national/international competitions can never be notable. - hako9 (talk) 07:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per GNG and NCHESS, not a strong enough player to meet the necessary level of coverage for an article. P-K3 (talk) 11:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.