The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 20:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redwater Health Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Non-Notable Hospital ttonyb1 (talk) 19:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hospital is notable enough to be here it is under the board of Capital Health in Edmonton.Kyle1278 (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This is a sloppy and incomplete nomination for a page which was created one hour ago. It follows a sloppy and inaccurate CSD tag of the article as "spam" (Arguably the article could have been tagged as an A7). If this is what our New Page Patrol does on a regular basis then I'm pretty disappointed. Note: I declined the speedy after the page creator commented on my talk page. Protonk (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • • Here are some sourses.
• http://www.capitalhealth.ca/default.htm
• http://www.capitalhealth.ca/HospitalsandHealthFacilities/Hospitals/RedwaterHealthCentre/default.htm
• http://www.capitalhealth.ca/NR/rdonlyres/eqdiprgn62w3xvkxix3wyd2jxm52c3r73nizr7nrdvmfmsqiaxblniije7r4afoehs46v4tghnzcuw2jmo43gtcf42c/CapitalHealth-Redwater.pdf
  
• http://www.capitalhealth.ca/ProgramsAndServices/locationdetails?service_id=5919
• http://employment.alberta.ca/documents/RRM/RRM-NE_redwater_lmn_oct07.pdf

All which make it notable enough to stay on wikipedia Kyle1278 (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • • • Those are likely not independent from the subject. You would be looking for news reports, books, magazine articles, or government publications etc. Not corporate websites. Protonk (talk) 19:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK third party recourses bolded one is not form the same corporate and it is an article about the Rural Hospitals and Capital Health is not a corporation it is run by the Government of Alberta.

• http://www.sturgeonadultlearning.ab.ca/PDF%20Files/redwater.pdf
  
• http://www.albertaruralhealth.ab.ca/search_result.html?SEARCH.SectionKey=45&SEARCH.Section=STORY&SK=2994&SEARCH.Theme=&SEARCH.Keyword=&SEARCH.Community=
  
• http://www.rpap.ab.ca/images/upload/RPAP-Hotsheet-January2007.pdf
  
• http://foundlocally.com/Edmonton/Health/HospitalsTips.htm

Kyle1278 (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. The nomination was a bit quick off the mark. There is no urgency on an article of this nature. But I am not sure that the health center is particularly notable. There is independent evidence that it exists, but not that there is anything particularly remarkable about it. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. What i am trying to do is make it notable by creating a full Capital Heath Section and included in that section would be this Hospitals this is another reason it should stay. And this is an government organization not a corporate business.

• Comment. The Capital Health article is fine - a large organization which I am sure has quite a lot of independent discussion. But this is a small facility that does not seem to be of any particular interest. Apart from listing the services it offers, will there ever be anything much to say? A few lines on it in the Capital Health article would be more appropriate. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I have added a great deal onto the article since i first made it earlier today and now i think it meets the standard's to stay here on Wikipedia it took awhile to dig up info but i did.

• Keep. The new material added by Kyle1278 establishes significance to me. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• http://www.town.redwater.ab.ca/admin/contentx/default.cfm?PageId=8469&hdrmenu=0

Kyle1278 (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Although it may not _currently_ display WP:N, I feel it _Will_ satisfy it... thus complying with WP:N's ..."it is important to not just consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be." Hopitals and Acute Care facilities generally do by their very nature. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 09:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Seems to meet WP:Notability, and if more of the sources that Kyle has found are added, then WP:Reliable sources as well. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 16:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Added larger section about the services the hospital offers with refrenses it really adds to the article. Kyle1278 (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Alberta Health Services. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• No Merge Capital Health is still its own board it might be under the superboard but it still ha sit's own articles.Kyle1278 (talk) 02:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.