Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piyo Blocks
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Piyo Blocks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article's subject seems to be non-notable. During my BEFORE search, I discovered that the majority of the sources I had found were about the second game, not the first. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 00:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 00:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete As stated, only the sequel appears notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Huh, can we not just change the title and article to Piyo Blocks 2 then? IgelRM (talk) 13:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- I feel like that wouldn't make sense. Why would you have an article about a game's sequel if the first game isn't notable? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 16:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Actually, that's pretty commonplace? Plenty of sequels get more recognition than their predecessor.
- I didn't notice the original article was written about both, so it should be suitable to Move to Piyo Blocks 2 and expunge mentions of the first game. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- I feel like that wouldn't make sense. Why would you have an article about a game's sequel if the first game isn't notable? TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 16:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Huh, can we not just change the title and article to Piyo Blocks 2 then? IgelRM (talk) 13:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete Maybe it was a Facebook video game without much notice / notoriety. 190.219.102.168 (talk) 23:53, 1 March 2025 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Geschichte (talk) 07:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Arguments to "Move" should be arguments to "Keep" and then a page move can be discussed. Move is not an AFD outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Liz. Move entails keep, there is no need to split hairs about that. You should be more concerned about the blatant sock of Alon9393 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom I have struck and reported. Geschichte (talk) 07:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)