The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NovoEd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear where notability lies. Refs give no clue since most appear to be a press release , passing or tangential mentions, relate to financing or are own web-site. Presumably there must be something better out there, but my searches found nothing of substance. In its current state it fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   22:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I've no idea what a program delivery platform is, but the article is promotional and does not say why it is notable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 06:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Holy marketing babble, Batman! I don't know what either a "program delivery platform" or a "blended learning solution" is, but between the latter unencyclopedic horror, and the use of "to partner" as a verb, this would need WP:TNT if it met WP:GNG, but I don't see that it does, either. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:36, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.