Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noufal Abdullah
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 07:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Noufal Abdullah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. There are many film editors in the world. Slatersteven (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
As a newbie in creating articles in wikipedia I apologize for not adding enough citations, I have updated with more news citations. I created this article as I believe he is a prominent editor in Malayalam Cinema and saw the name in red in many film wikipedia pages. Tshanib (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please read wp:n, sources have to be about him or at least be more then just mentions.Slatersteven (talk) 11:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete @Tshanib:, you probably want to take a look at the notability guidelines before you continue. There are many, but the ones that apply to this article (in order from more-general to more-specific) are the General Notability Guideline, the Notability (people) guideline, and the Creative Professionals section of the people guideline. What these guidelines all have in common is that they ask for evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. The 27(!) references in the article are no more than film credits. They demonstrate the article subject has been involved with notable projects, not that the subject is notable in their own right. I hope this helps explain things. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. In general film editors lack RS unless they have been nominated or won a major award (such as an Academy Award). That's the nature of the way media and writers on film cover this content area. There just isn't any significant sources to support an article on this individual.4meter4 (talk) 03:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.