The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Nönnig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater; PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and Germany. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Found several mentions, but none with significant coverage. Aona1212 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No SIGCOV found on search, failing GNG.Canary757 (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment I was aware of two of the sources mentioned below when I made my original vote and I am reaffirming it.Canary757 (talk) 07:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I see there's a German wiki version too, which makes sense since the subject is German, but i hazily think of the German wikipedia as being tougher on notability. Both the en and de version were created by the same editor. In any event, i see some german news mentions of her, but not significant and she didn't have international wins that would make me think an article surely must exist on her.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Cannot find any significant coverage.

  Shrug02 (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Here's something about her in a book: [1]. --Moscow Connection (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• One paragraph and a half here: [2]. One paragraph here: [3].
  These paragraphs don't constitute significant coverage, but it's still something. So I've decided to leave the links here. (Der Spiegel and some German sites don't open for me, but you can search for "Nicole Nönnig Eiskunstlauf".) --Moscow Connection (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• I have found the article used as a reference in the Web Archive, here →→→ [4]. That's a complete biography for you.
  Strong keep. (Considering that she competed more than 20 years ago and that that time's figure skating articles are impossible to find.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Subject does not appear to have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Of the sources provided by Moscow Connection, while I can't view the book source the articles in order are (1) a couple of sentences briefly mentioning the skaker and her partner finishing second to last at a tournament, with no additional detail (2) a passing mention in an tournament recap and (3) a substantial bio about the subject and her partner, which while this is WP:SIGCOV with only one usable source there isn't nearly enough for this BLP to meet the guidelines. Please ping me if more coverage can be found as I am open to changing my vote should more/better coverage be found. Let'srun (talk) 15:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 08:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom, the subject lacks notability. There isn't enough WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG. I agree with Let'srun's analysis - even with the bio found by Moscow Connection, it's only one source, and a so-so one at that. There's just not enough coverage to justify an article at this time.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.