Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Taculod
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Neil Taculod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) â (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL)
Seemingly non-notable. Because of frequent re-creations it might be a good idea to let a full AfD run its course, and possibly salt (which I would support). As it stands it could be up for A7, apart from the (dubious) claim he is signed on Sony Music in the infobox.
Apart from that it is a copy-paste move from userspace, but there is not much use fixing that if we're going to delete this. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Maybe sometime, but not today. No usable sources listed in the article, and searching produces no news or anything other than the pages upon pages of lyrics, YouTube, and social network pages that seem to accompany any musician these days, no matter how insignificant. Mangoe (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It is not demonstated by reliable sources that the subject meets any of the critera of WP:MUSICBIO. ĹĹŻášÄŤÎŁÄťÂš98šSpeak 23:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ⢠Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ⢠Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ⢠Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm unable to find coverage in reliable sources for this person; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO.  Gongshow Talk 00:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no reliable sources found. --Â OBSIDIANâ SOUL 05:15, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Concur with salting proposal by nominator. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closing admin: A album article from this artist was created at Chasing Life. Should the result of this AfD be delete, the album article needs to be deleted, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I afd'd the album, but I agree that if this gets deleted, that article should be speedied at that point. --Dirk Beetstra T C 07:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced, promotional, not-notable. --Dirk Beetstra T C 07:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I've not found anything resembling reliable coverage - a Google search on "Neil Taculod" "Sony Music" shows only six results, all from either Wikipedia or primary sources, so that's likely a false claim. It appears that he may have covered a Sony song, but that's hardly the same as being signed by them. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails to meet our N requirements.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not ready for prime time. Â -- WikHead (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - could not find reliable sources. Pls can someone close this! (and see Chasing Life above) Widefox (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete and saltChasing life? Well this article's life is about to end. Unfortunately, I was unable to find any reliable sources that prove's this singer's notability. All I found were YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and lyric links, which do not satisfy WP:RS. Also fails WP:N for not being signed to a major record label. Please delete this, the temperature in the Philippines has become unusually low already. 11:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)~~
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.