Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. Susie Day
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- N. Susie Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficiently notable subject. City council member who does not meet the notability requirements of the WP:GNG. Also see WP:BIO#Politicians, which states, "A politician who has received 'significant press coverage' has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists."[1] This is not the case here. PROD contested, so comes here for deletion. — Satori Son 17:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. She is a councillor of a large metropolitan area; such local politicians are often included on the basis of the "significant press coverage/in depth" clause. However, I do not see anywhere near such coverage here. Subject to anyone being able to present such coverage in this AfD (perhaps my searching is faulty), I see no reason why this local politician should be treated as an exception. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. -- Mkativerata (talk) 19:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Mkativerata (talk) 19:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I can't find any sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.