The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 05:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kochu Hassan Kunju Bahadoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems more like an essay-granted I don't know anything about this subject, but this guy does not seem like a notable person at all. Wgolf (talk) 23:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The article text is a mess, but that is a matter for normal editing. The main claim to notability is probably the subject being on the Sree Moolam Popular Assembly which may meet WP:POLITICIAN #1. That needs referenced but note also this rather poor page photo on Commons: [1]. AllyD (talk) 08:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article meets WP:POLITICIAN as he was elected to Sree Moolam Popular Assembly. This indicates enough notability but the article needs a lot of cleanup.--Skr15081997 (talk) 03:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'm not even sure what that is-but I guess I'll take your word for that. Wgolf (talk) 03:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Does appear to meet the criteria of WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 02:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.