The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:47, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kiki Ayers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This all looks like self promotion. Most (all?) of the sources look like regurgitated press releases - lots of personal quotes and interview type material. I couldn't find anything that appeared to be both reliable and independednt. For someone who clearly styles herself as a PR person, we need higher standards than this. Also curious that the author got up to the tally of 10 edits by trvilal edits in September and then appears with this. Smacks of paid editing to me. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Kiki Ayers fails to meet WP:NOTE, in my opinion. Fred (talk) 13:57, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.