Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Parks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by Athaenara (talk · contribs): "G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Parks as well." NAC. — Glenfarclas (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Joey Parks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. This person does not appear to have risen to a level of any significance or notoriety in his photography or radio careers. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 05:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, completely non-notable wedding photographer and, briefly, radio fill-in guy. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is "notoriety" a state to which one can "rise"? Well well. Anyway, this bloke seems unnotable. Delete. -- Hoary (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.