The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Charara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One mention on government website, and other sources doesnt prove the WP:GNG and also lacks the enough references.

Any experience user says If I am wrong, I’m okay to withdraw. Autograph (talk) 07:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Psychology, and United Kingdom. Autograph (talk) 07:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources found, what's used in the article seems mostly primary. Oaktree b (talk) 13:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism and Morocco. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.