Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatt in Mood
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was incubate. —Darkwind (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Jatt in Mood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced article about a future, non-notable film. WP:NOTCRYSTAL Benboy00 (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Per WP:INDAFD, here are possible Indian News sources. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubate per instructions at WP:Deletion policy. I found evidence that this project began filming, and it may even have completed... but I can find no evidence that it is slated to release in October as stated in the article. We can take it out of mainspace until it is released or until more sources come forward showing is production as notable. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubate: Per Schmidt (I generally try to avoid such arguments "per this editor", but, actually he has told everything what I was going to say). --Tito☸Dutta 21:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.