The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. notability has been proven, and the nominator gave permission to close the nomination in question. (non-admin closure) TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 20:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inner Tay Estuary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No edit from some time after the creation. ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment That is hardly a rationale for an AfD (especially coming less than 6 hours after the article's creation). AllyD (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• (edit conflict) Comment - Hold on a second. This was created 5-6 hours ago, so I request you clarify your deletion rationale. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The sources already in the article indicate that subject of the article is designated as a Local nature reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest; passes WP:GNG. I recommend WP:BEFORE for the nominator. AllyD (talk) 20:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I choose it because i think these 5-6 hours are enough and user is no more interested.I might be wrong because i have just started working in deletion matters.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 20:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The question here is whether the subject of the article meets the Wikipedia notability guidelines, not the editing frequency of a new editor creating their first article. AllyD (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I apologize as i should not did it without checking facts.Sorry,plz remove tag.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 20:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.