The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fedmyster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

his only notability is the controversial stuff he did, and being a former org member. little actually encyclopedic useful information. Http iosue (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete: This is about him [1], some coverage in gaming sites. Got hit after hit on GameRant, but that's an iffy source. One more decent source, we'd be ok Oaktree b (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Internet, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.