The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this project does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Desheret (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable and non functioning online collection of items, apparently abandoned some time ago. Mccapra (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:34, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:34, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:34, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• What do you mean "non-functioning"? The website is still up and seems to function just fine. SpinningSpark 20:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • there’s very little content on it and it looks to me like it’s not being updated. Mccapra (talk) 21:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Notability is not temporary: if it was once notable, it's notable. The website is (2018) working properly. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, notability is not temporary, the problem is, this site never seems to have ever had any. It might make a useful EL somewhere else, but as a standalone page, it has to be delete. SpinningSpark 22:21, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - All I can see about it on any independent source is that it's a website made by 3 students. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:24, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per everyone else. Couldn't find any independent RS mentioning this website. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 10:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.