Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deacons (lawyers)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 21:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Deacons (lawyers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Australasian law firm. Article created by an spa with a likely COI. Are they notable? -- RHaworth 06:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but rename to Deacons (law firm). With over 900 lawyers in seven countries, this is apparently one of the largest Australian law firms. A Google search reveals numerous hits for them both on a web search and a news search, so it should be possible to get this article in decent shape to satisfy WP:CORP. --Metropolitan90 07:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The achievements listed include recognition by various reliable sources. --Eastmain 08:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but rename international law firm. Ohconfucius 08:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 18:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename Per Metropolitan. This article scrapes by WP:CORP by the thinnist of thin margins. Needs some significant work, which I have made a basic start on. If anyone else wants to help clean this up, then please chip in. Thewinchester (talk) 07:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename The article needs to be better sourced but meets WP:CORP. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 09:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Page only created a couple of days ago. Not notable yet without secondary sources, but too early to delete. If this is a SPA, then I'm sure a law firm could research some reasonable secondary sources quickly. Assize 11:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.