The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 20:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Farina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable; no serious sources — Moriwen (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Science. — Moriwen (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment See the AfD from October about the same individual, under the name of his YouTube channel. XOR'easter (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Biology, Mathematics, Internet, and Minnesota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete since nothing appears to have changed re notability or sources since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professor Dave Explains. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This appears to be an attempt to circumvent the previous deletion decision by changing the title of the article. He is not a notable internet personality and his YouTube channel is one of millions that have some followers but no significant media coverage as matters of public notice. Could also redirect to The Lonely Wild if his name is a likely search term. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to lack of coverage from reliable secondary sources. ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 14:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The new article is different enough from the deleted one to not be subject to G4 speedy deletion, but does not present any reason to reverse the recent deletion decision. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I mean, i made the article and i think we should delete it. 1timeuse75 (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to The Lonely Wild, as we commonly do with band members who aren't independently notable. Bearian (talk) 05:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Redirect to Lonely Wild -- nothing changed since the Professor Dave Explains vote (but agree with David Eppstein to not be speedy, but might as well be a SNOW). -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nominator -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 16:43, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.