Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory DeAn Cowley
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cory DeAn Cowley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed through WP:NPP. Apparent autobiography of a non-notable artist/writer. Sources are entirely unreliable and most only mention the subject in passing anyway. Spicy (talk) 22:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Tennessee. Spicy (talk) 22:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Delete I am not finding any reliable sources on this person. Created under CIO. WP:TOOSOON -- WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Name-dropped in a bunch of advertorials, no serious third party coverage.-KH-1 (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:56, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per what sources I could find, unfortunately. Hoping for a comeback at some point. Possible copyright violation from [1]. This [2] may be the same person, but per WP:DAILYMAIL that doesn't help. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Failed WP:AUTHOR, references only mention the author in passing, and there is no WP:SIGCOV about the author. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and salt per WP:SOAP, WP:CIO, WP:SPAM and WP:NOTWEBHOST. In 2022, everyone knows that Wikipedia is not a social media website nor a free web host, and that we are a charity, and abuse of our status is subject to the harshest penalties. Bearian (talk) 13:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.