Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelpedo punk
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chelpedo punk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like a neologism. DimaG (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Google shows nothing relevant, and the article's garbage. — ♣№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė♫♪ 07:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find anything, see Ghits. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrocrunk as an example of the usual fate of such articles. Bearian (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.