Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Lomana
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:13, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Carmen Lomana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no notability SoftwareLibre (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Uncertain She certainly doesn't sound notable from the article. But a Google News search [1] turns up a ton of references, including many in major sources. However they are all in Spanish so I can't evaluate them. I get the feeling she is "famous for being famous" rather than for anything specific, but that still might amount to notability. --MelanieN (talk) 01:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. —MelanieN (talk) 02:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 05:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - like it or not she's a big celeb and even the rarefied subculture of Wikipedia editors is entitled to know who's being referred to. Or is knowledge too precious to share? Opbeith (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.