Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutabali
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete redirect to Satkhandagama. ✗plicit 01:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bhutabali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject has only written a single text, apart from which, there is no other biographical information available. Hence, low notability. Not many WP:RS mention the subject. Moreover, the same information as on this page is also available on the page Satkhandagama. Tagging other active users of this project and those who responded to a similar AfD previously: User:RJShashwat, User:Goyama, User:Expectopatronum30, User:TheAstorPastor. To fellow editors: please feel free to not respond if you didn't wish to be tagged here. I apologize for the same. ParvatPrakash (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ParvatPrakash (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete — Per nominator. Not seeing notability… or rather, not seeing the RSs to support alleged notability. Semi-merger or merger with Satkhandagama should be considered. MWFwiki (talk) 01:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- If there aren't more sources redirect to Satkhandagama. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- I couldn't find any more sources. Whichever I found only state that he wrote Satkhandagama, nothing more than that. I couldn't find any other biographical information about him. ParvatPrakash (talk) 03:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: No notability except authorship of Satkhandagama. Didn't find any personal information about him that would enhance his biography. Goyama (talk) 07:08, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Poor notability. I am not sure if he even existed cause of the scarce information about him. RJShashwat (talk) 20:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment from nom: Even though some sources were added after nomination, they all still say the same thing that the subject is said to have authored a text. I feel, in that case, an article on Satkhandagama as it already exists would be enough instead of a separate article about the author about whom nothing is known apart from the information that he authored the said text. The text seems to be more notable than the author himself. ParvatPrakash (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.