The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Khoikhoi 00:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kars (1920) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I don't think that this deserves its own article especially because it wasn't even much of a battle. Most of the information covered here is already extensively covered in the Turkish-Armenian War article. -- Clevelander 02:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, on second thought, I was acting irrationally. Of course these articles can be expanded. I apologize for causing a big stir about all this. Nomination withdrawn. -- Clevelander 14:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment See my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Oltu Caknuck 03:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep These battles do exist. I have questions regarding the credibility of the argument that there is no information. There are many shorter articles on wikipedia? Why we are in such a rush to delete these article?OttomanReference 04:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per only 39 google hits [[1]] and most of them are copy pages of wikipedia's. This "battle" sounds made up to me. Chaldean 04:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep notable event. RiseRobotRise 10:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. The Turkish/Armenian war suffers from a lack of documentation, but this is a genuine and notable event. --Squeezeweasel^talk 14:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.