Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisa Apps
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 05:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Alisa Apps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disputed prod and then an attempt to list at AFD by someone else didn't work. I am trying to fix this. Reason for deletion given was "This article is about a non-notable musician. It's only links are to disambiguation articles on non notable webpages and commercial RP releases. The subject is not notable enough to merit an article and does not meet general Wikipedia notability guidelines. The article does not link to notable sources. The artists has not release any material on any notable record label, publishing house or achieved any record sales or chart success. The article claims that her notability come from her video being banned from Youtube.com. Inappropriate sexual content postings on youtube are not a criteria for a wikipedia article. The article has clearly been created by the artists as self promotion." I agree that it should be deleted, so count this as my delete too. DreamGuy (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - None of the references in the article are reliable sources. My own search turns up only press releases. -- Whpq (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Just wanted to re-check 100% and I have found no notable accomplishments or reliable references to any release or recording contracts etc. Is the list at AFD all correct now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robotgirl2001 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC) — Robotgirl2001 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see any indication of notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.