The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Zephead999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Zubt555 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
71.182.85.70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Pie76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Bsroiaadn^Talk 22:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Diff of edit by Zephead999
Diff of edit by Zubt555
Diff of talk page comment by 71.182.85.70 talking about how it shouldn't be mentioned in Rush article if it's not mentioned in the Led Zeppelin article, which the other two accounts did a lot.
Check the contributions of all three four as well, they all edit the same article and began after the last stopped.
Also, check these:
diff of edit by Zephead999
diff of edit by 71.182.92.118
diff of edit by Pie76

Comments

See also: Dragong4 (talk · contribs) and Zabrak (talk · contribs). Both are previously blocked account with very similar editing habits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 156.34.142.110 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had tagged Zephead999 as a suspected sockpuppet of Dragong4, but Bsroiaadn removed it. Dancter 01:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Zephead999 and Pie76 were already indefinitely blocked for vandalism. Based on Zubt555's behavior and edits, the account is a crystal clear sock and has been blocked indef as well. The IP address is also pretty clearly a sock, but has not edited recently and is probably dynamic so will not be blocked unless used again for the same purpose. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]