Eisspeedway

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

I will leave this for somebody who knows the topic better, but I don't see any major controversy myself. It looks like NGRAM viewer slightly favors the proposed title, but I don't know what the sample size is. ASUKITE 16:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

@Revirvlkodlaku WP:COMMONNAME seems to be without periods, any sources? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All their album releases include periods, so while it's likelly that they are often written about without the periods, this seems to be the proper way to spell the band's name. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Better do a full RM using the above discuss button ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 03:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Bunnypranav, what's an RM? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A requested move discussion. SilverLocust 💬 19:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Either click on the "discuss" link next to your original suggestion or just delete all this here and start over by following the instructions at WP:RSPM. But I'll warn you that Wikipedia doesn't really care what's on the album cover. Wikipedia uses WP:COMMONNAME, not WP:OFFICIALNAME. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Anonymousrabbit See WP:NAMECHANGES. C F A 23:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Revirvlkodlaku The current redirect at Nuda serves as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. GTrang (talk) 04:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so can that be changed? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 10:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Beroidae should stay as the primary meaning, because the rest are just works of art. — Petr Matas 13:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain what you mean? Are works of art seen as having lower importance? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Works of art may not have lower importance, but real-world meanings come to the mind first. For example, Mammals are a biological class, exactly like Nuda. Other meanings are only artworks and art bands and the primary meaning is the class. — Petr Matas 14:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@LIrala Wait for Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_January_14#Trans* to close first --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
20:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OKay. LIrala (talk) 08:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Skmri there was a discussion back in 2017 leading to the current title. Even though the change is relatively small, it may be worth having a discussion to make sure this doesn't get reverted ASUKITE 15:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to comment on this that the hyphenation it should most definitely be Blood oxygenation level–dependent imaging with an endash since "blood oxygenation level" is a multi-word phrase and is modifying "dependent". See WP:ENDASH. I'll leave the distinction between oxygen and oxygenation to the RM. Bensci54 (talk) 17:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

  1. ^ "ACIR Community". acir.aphis.usda.gov.