The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. no consensus for deletion after three weeks of discussion - default keep JForget 00:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Värmlands Filmförbund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film company. No secondary sources found to establish notability of company. Created by a user who created a whole slew of conflict of interest articles that were deleted a couple years ago. Was previously considered for deletion in this nomination. Claim to fame is operation of a film festival called Filmörnen which is also of questionable notability and is currently up for deletion here. Redfarmer (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This discussion is not linked properly from the article - it has a redlink in the template where the link to this article should be! Tomas e (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • This discussion is properly linked. I'm kind of baffled by this user's comments on two of my open AfDs. Redfarmer (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Now the link works, it didn't when I added the comment, and usually the text "this article's entry" is not a redlink. I now have seen the explanation at the other page that this slightly buggish phenomenon isn't anything to worry about, since the redlink actually works despite being red. Sorry for the bafflement caused and space wasted. Tomas e (talk) 19:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Week keep. Admittedly marginal notability as it is a regional film association, but in my opinion barely makes the cut together with their long-running festival Filmörnen, which could be merged here to provide a more substantial article. The interwiki-linked articles in svwiki exist unchallenged. Tomas e (talk) 19:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 02:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.