The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A mention in the Dolls dab page mentioning Nova should be enough Black Kite (t) (c) 06:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dolls (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a hoax. I can find no information via Google about this band. Burpelson AFB (talk) 01:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I find lots of stuff about the New York Dolls, but nothing about this band. There appear to be no reliable sources to establish the band's notability.--Chaser (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It fails notability, i cant seem to find any sources on this band. Dwayne was here! ^talk 03:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. Fails WP:BAND and WP:RS. Gets no ghits. --Morenooso (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Nova (Swedish band) = Malta (band). They exist(ed), as should be obvious after copyediting and partial referencing, but I don't think they're really notable enough for Nova & the Dolls to be split into two. Tomas e (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.