The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G7‎. Fathoms Below (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nash Jocic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NACADEMIC, fascinating as a bodybuilding philosopher is. — Moriwen (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy, Bodybuilding, and England. — Moriwen (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: All sources are unreliable and self published. there's no significant coverage about the subject and the article itself lacks structure. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 19:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per Cameremote. KOLANO12 3 19:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Health and fitness. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Macedonia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.