The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Melouky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article at current state, did not shown WP:notability. There is no but only one external source (primary source / official site), may due to language barrier of source, searching Melouky in Google, there is no result that related to the company; unable to determine ملوكي‎ and its google search outcome. Matthew_hk tc 15:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Matthew_hk tc 15:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 16:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 16:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. Article is promotional and is nothing more than a rewording of their home page. Based on that the article, arguably, should be speedy deleted as an advert. Jbh ^Talk 16:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Article is promotional and appears to be written by a member of the same family who own the company and is already involved in other controversial contributions on numerous business articles. Further, it fails reliable sources and Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. This is advertising pure and simple and should be subject to speedy deletion. David J Johnson (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to quickly point out that I am in no way related to the people who own this business nor have I accepted any for of payment to make this page. We share the same last name because everybody in my town has the same last name and this company is based where I live. I do understand it is not well sourced and no more constructive information can be added at the moment. Maybe in the future when they are more relevant can new information be published. KarimKoueider (talk) 02:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• If that is the case, why did you originate the article?? David J Johnson (talk) 09:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I thought it would gain more traction from independent Egyptian Editors to add more reliable information, It has not. KarimKoueider (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the related WP:ANI. Matthew_hk tc 02:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - or speedy deleted as an advert. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. KarimKoueider (talk) 03:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to quickly point out that I am in no way related to the people who own this business nor have I accepted any for of payment to make this page. We share the same last name because everybody in my town has the same last name and this company is based where I live. I do understand it is not well sourced and no more constructive information can be added at the moment. Maybe in the future when they are more relevant can new information be published. A quick google search of Koueider will bring you a lot of companies and families with a similar name (e.g. Abdel Rahim Koueider, Mandarine Koueider etc.) Its a popular name where im from KarimKoueider (talk) 03:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• To point out that this is just a duplicate of the comment from this user above. It also does not explain why they are now proposing deletion when they wrote the original article? Any admin should also check KarimKoueider talk for other editors concerns over this user. David J Johnson (talk) 10:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Confectionery supplier that does not meet WP:NCORP criteria for notability. Mentions in regional sources are not adequate.--SamHolt6 (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.