The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Comadena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sportsperson. Fails WP:GNG. Bullpen catchers aren't coaches covered by WP:BASE/N per WP:BASEBALL consensus. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that Comadena, as a bullpen catcher, is not automatically considered notable. However, given that there are a number of sources out there about him (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) --- of which at least sources 3 and 8 are profiles or reports in notable sources, this combined with his association with the team may have him considered notable enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Even if not in his own article, he would seem to warrant more than a simple name listing on the Pirates' roster. Editosaurus (talk) 15:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are some sources, more than the other Pirates bullpen catcher, but how many of these are good quality sources that count to notability? The Pantagraph and Houston Chronicle are, but one of those is Purdue's website, another is a collegiate summer league website, and another is to Blogspot. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails the notability guidelines for baseball so we should delete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll just say this: just because being a bullpen catcher does not make one automatically notable does not mean that being one makes one automatically non-notable. Editosaurus (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete He doesn't meet the notability guidelines for baseball players and I don't believe he has the significant independent coverage needed to meet the GNG. Most of the sites are just statistics or blogs.Sandals1 (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.