Edit with VisualEditor

Welcome to Wikipedia, WDM10! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 04:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit at Sydney Showground Stadium, not because it's necessarily wrong, but because it's probably the wrong place to start. You have made an interesting observation. The club DOES appear to use all capitals in the GIANTS part of its name. I suggest you take your observations to the Talk page of the club's Wikipedia article. That's Talk:Greater Western Sydney Giants. Note that it's important to gain consensus on the Talk page before you actually change the article. I will be interested to read what other editors think. Good luck. HiLo48 (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 NRL season results, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panthers Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Greece national rugby league team results, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 All Stars match, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earlwood Saints is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earlwood Saints until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 22:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An alternative format to an Infobox has been added to link between the articles with different date ranges. Matilda Maniac (talk) 02:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. WDM10 (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A-League Finals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawrence Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Australia vs England in rugby league, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 22:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewers of drafts submitted to AfC can accept, decline or reject a draft. Decline means they believe the topic may be suitable, but the draft has correctable flaws, one or more of which are usually provided. The draft's editor can revise the draft and resubmit. Most often, a different reviewer will next examine the draft, and may have different objections. A rejection means the reviewer's opinion is that the topic is not worthy. Editors can by-pass AfC, but a flawed article could then be flipped back to draft or submitted to Articles for deletion. David notMD (talk) 09:08, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Thanks for your information. Just to confirm, was this responding to my teahouse question? WDM10 (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. David notMD (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks again. WDM10 (talk) 09:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! You created a thread called Moving drafts to the mainspace at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! You created a thread called Moving drafts to the mainspace which have never been deleted at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC). (You can at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, WDM10,

Thank you for creating List of Macarthur FC players.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the Draft:List of National Soccer League Clubs but at the same time I merged the main table you created in to the National Soccer League article. I think there may be the potential to extract the sections on clubs from the main article and create a stand alone daughter article if you were to look at creating tables for the period between 1957 and 1977, where a number of early iterations of NSL with the National Ampol cup, and the Australia cup taking place reflecting the NSL article. Gnangarra 08:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So like a pre-NSL history? WDM10 (talk) 09:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes so it has the same structure of the main article. Gnangarra 10:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind if you could just help me start it off so I know exactly what to do? WDM10 (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 1999 National Soccer League Grand Final, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! You created a thread called Edits on the Visual Editor at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen Wikipedia pages like this -- for other countries or sports, perhaps? I've joined Wikiproject Australia recently and I'm not sure what kind of coverage is needed for such a draft to be approved. Just checking if you have any examples. --Gryllida (talk) 05:21, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gryllida: I based that article of Australia vs New Zealand in rugby league which is of a similar type. Likewise, in rugby union there’s an article called History of rugby union matches between Australia and England. Is there a specific idea that you’re thinking of? WDM10 (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this looks like it. Gryllida (talk) 09:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at it again (very new to these drafts things, still getting started...) It looks like the `title` fields of the sources can be added (different from HTML title of original) to include the game dates or participants or some other unique information, so that they do not seem the same. --Gryllida (talk) 09:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gryllida: The title of the reference can be changed to what you want. WDM10 (talk) 09:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! You created a thread called Another visual editing question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! You created a thread called Peer reviewing articles at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! You created a thread called Italicised titles at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit. Thanks you. Vomli (talk) 07:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vomli: Apologies, but do you have the right user and if it's me, what exactly do you want me to do? I ask because I have never edited a badminton article before. WDM10 (talk) 07:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can add citations to the article. Vomli (talk) 07:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vomli: I'd be happy to do so but I'm just asking am I the right person you are looking for as I've never touched an article like that before. WDM10 (talk) 07:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are the right person and I trust you. Vomli (talk) 07:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vomli: Thanks for the kind words. I've added a citation and the article, overall, looks very good to me! :) WDM10 (talk) 07:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Heavily relies on same source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greece national rugby league team results and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Greece national rugby league team results, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 11:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiAviator (talk) 11:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greece national rugby league team results, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1999 National Soccer League Grand Final, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hack (talk) 04:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australia vs England in rugby league, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 22:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Macarthur FC players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a list with no items; Macarthur have yet to play a competitive game.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Happy to discuss further if you'd like. I feel like this is even more of a concern now that the logistics of next season are up in the air - but regardless, I can't see the use of the page when there are no relevant entries yet.

Macosal (talk) 13:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Macosal: I'm ok with it being deleted. When I created it, I didn't realise the players had to have played a match for the club but now I know how it works you can go ahead and get rid of it until they do play a match. WDM10 (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2002 National Soccer League Grand Final, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dally M Awards winners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josh Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Names in articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

• Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing @. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.
• New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
• New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
• Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 80 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 19:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me about it. I like it quite a lot. WDM10 (talk) 20:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WDM10, great to hear! Please let us know if you have any issues or general feedback over at the talk page :) Ed6767 talk! 20:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I should have taken care of the article. Let me know if there's anything else I should take care of. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your additions. WDM10 (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chris troutman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Subject fails WP:LISTN and the content is original research. Wikipedia is not a storage venue for tables of information; we're an encyclopedia.

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:

• The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
• More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
• Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
• The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
• Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
• On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
• In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WDM10! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Files across different language Wikipedias, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you see as the purpose of separate pages for the four groups? I can't see any information going into these pages that isn't going to be in the main article under the group sub-section. In which case, what is the point of having four separate sub-pages? Nthep (talk) 12:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: Right now, the pages look pretty similar however when the tournament comes around, these pages will contain team lists and details of the game. See the 2017 Rugby League World Cup group pages for what I'm basing this off. WDM10 (talk) 20:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If it's only team lists and like the 2017 pages they are going to be collapsed I don't see why that couldn't all go in the main article as that would be the only non-duplicated information as it stands. Nthep (talk) 21:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: But the main page usually just consists of the scores in the tables, unless we’re willing to scrap those and just have the match boxes there. However we should probably do that across all tournaments then to be consistent. WDM10 (talk) 22:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've already linked the match boxes for Group A from the gp A article to the main and was intending to do the others affer we'd conclude this discussion. I think you've swung it to keeping the group articles separate. If after the tournament these little in them merging can be considered then. Nthep (talk) 09:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: That sounds good to me. WDM10 (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the discussion. As I said to someone else yesterday the problem with a lot of rugby league articles is that they are little more than a collection of stats about the player or competition with little or mo narrative. If we can work on the 2021 WC articles to try and make sure that isn't the case here would be a good outcome. Nthep (talk) 09:59, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: That is very true. We could base our group articles off the RWC articles as they have the overview prose at the beginnings of their pool pages. WDM10 (talk) 10:16, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of National Soccer League Clubs, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Thanks for recently undoing vandalism on List of Eurovision Song Contest winners. In the future, when you undo vandalism, could you please use the appropriate template to warn the user (IP or registered) to stop their behaviour?

There are many different warning templates available to use. Here are some popular ones. Please see their documentation pages for instructions.

• {{subst:Uw-vandalism1}} - For the first case of vandalism.
• {{subst:Uw-vandalism2}} - For the second case.
• {{subst:Uw-vandalism3}} - Third.
• {{subst:Uw-vandalism4}} - Fourth or final warning.
• {{subst:Uw-vandalism4im}} - Last or only warning for severe situations.

Each time we use these warnings they should be placed under the title "==December 2024==" (updated to the current month and year), on the user's talk page. If previous warnings have been given under that title, add the next level warning beneath the others, within that section. Clearly, individual cases must be dealt with as seems fit. If the user has not been actively vandalizing for a few weeks or months, start a new section.

The value of warning is three fold.

• Firstly: it may be heeded.
• Secondly: it allows other editors to quickly see if that user has been vandalizing frequently or recently.
• Lastly: administrators require that warnings have been given before they can or will act against persistent vandals.

If a vandal is on a spree or has reached a level 4 vandalism warning and is currently active, waste no time in reporting them to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.

Thanks again for helping to protect articles on Wikipedia. Happy editing! JochemvanHees (talk) 15:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. WDM10 (talk) 20:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

• More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
• Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
• Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[1]

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

• The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
• Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, What are your interests? Maybe we can collab? I have quite a few articles to write/publish, pretty much like the Ade Oladipo article, so I'd love a researcher or editor to partner up with.

Let me know.

Regards, Black Elephant Ed. Black Elephant Ed. (talk) 22:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, What are your interests? Maybe we can collab? I have quite a few articles to write/publish, pretty much like the Ade Oladipo article, so I'd love a researcher or editor to partner up with.

Let me know.

Regards, Black Elephant Ed. Black Elephant Ed. (talk) 22:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I mostly edit sports pages (particularly rugby league and football) as well as pages relating to the Eurovision Song Contest. WDM10 (talk) 00:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NRL finals system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 9.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2019 NRL Finals Series, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Rugby League World Cup winners".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you changed the edits on St. George Illawarra. The club even though they are called that are still referred to in the media as St. George and are still given the nicknames Saints and Red V. In very many ways the club is more St. George than anything. Illawarra contributes very little to the joint venture. I doubt people who would be new to the article would be confused by St. George Illawarra and St. George as they are both the same thing. Sully198787 (talk) 17:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your points about branding however as the St. George Dragons are the name of the old club and part owners of the current club, there is still a difference between what is “St. George” and what is “St. George Illawarra” and this difference, even if it doesn’t seem confusing for newcomers, should be stated. WDM10 (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 end-of-year rugby union internationals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James O'Connor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huddersfield Giants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luke Robinson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 NRL Grand Final, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ben Davies (rugby league, born 2000) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ben Davies (rugby league, born 2000), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how would I edit the template on the main page, because it only shows ((Super League xxv regular season table)) and I can't figure out how to edit it (not that it needs editing anyway) without having to go into the template itself? Thanks L1amw90 (talk) 07:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@L1amw90: You would have to go into the template itself, there's no way to edit templates like that in the articles. WDM10 (talk) 07:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jake Wingfield instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jake Wingfield and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jake Wingfield, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2002 National Soccer League Grand Final".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of NRL Women's Premiership records".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greece at the Rugby League World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece at the Rugby League World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamaica at the Rugby League World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaica at the Rugby League World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

• The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
• It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.

Research notes:

• As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
• There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[2]
• The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[3] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
• A large A/B test will start soon.[4] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.

The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[5] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.

During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of National Soccer League Clubs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave more accurate, specific edit summaries rather than "Typo" or "Update". Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks. Was a bit confused by what you meant at first but will make an effort to add more detail. WDM10 (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of New South Wales rugby league team squads, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Murray.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

• Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
• The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, WDM10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of National Soccer League Clubs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A new discussion has begun regarding the AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates. Please add your thoughts there. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would just like to know what source you know of that cites the 2021/22 season as showing the second-placed A-League team to qualify for the AFC Cup.

Cheers.

@MarioBayo: I did not put that in the ladder template so cannot say for sure. This link states that it is likely however I do not believe that there is an official announcement yet. WDM10 (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have also looked around and seen the possibility, but unsure as Aussie teams have never played in that competition. Thanks.

Basically the tournament is for teams within a certain AFC coefficient ranking, which Australia has never been in until now, explaining why Aussie clubs have never competed until what will be 2023. WDM10 (talk) 20:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RLWC2025 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Template:NRLW2020Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bayer 04 Leverkusen in European football, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bayer 04 Leverkusen in European football".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WDM10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bayer 04 Leverkusen in European football".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2026 Men's Rugby League World Cup qualification has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All information here now redundant due to the tournament rescheduling

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision News Desk Shortcut WP:ESC/N Dear Eurovision Wikipedian, Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the Swedish flag . Content and design updates are taking place daily. The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress. Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week. To receive a daily or weekly Eurovision news update please click on the appropriate button. Cordially, News Desk Editor-in-Chief Ktkvtsh (talk)

Eurovision Daily News Update 16 August 2023 Happy birthday to... Marc Moulin who would be 81 today. He represented Belgium 1980 as part of Telex, placing (17th) Happy birthday to... Jari Sillanpää who is 58 today. He represented Finland 2004 placing (14th in the Semi Final) Recently in the news... Patricia Bredin, the first representative to Eurovision from the United Kingdom, has died aged 88. Recently in the news... EasyJet is launching a new route from the United Kingdom to the Icelandic city of Akureyri, near Húsavík. Did you know... The largest number of nations to take part was 43 in 2008, 2011 and 2018. Eurovision entrant... Dave Benton (born 31 January 1951, birth name Efrén Eugene Benita) is a pop musician from Aruba who lives in Estonia. He is one of the winners of the Eurovision Song Contest 2001. At the age of 50 years and 101 days at the time of his victory, Benton is the oldest singer ever to win Eurovision, as well as the first Black winner. Born Efrén Eugene Benita in 1951 on the Caribbean island of Aruba, he was fluent in English, Dutch, Spanish and Papiamento, the creole language of the island. As a drummer and a backing vocalist, he worked with The Drifters, Tom Jones, Billy Ocean, José Feliciano and The Platters. Benton's daughter Sissi participated in Eesti Laul in 2021 with the song "Time", attempting to follow in her father's footsteps and represent Estonia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021. She qualified to the superfinal, where she placed second.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Annual Cricket Newsletter – Issue I, December 2024 • Published by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Newsroom • Subscribe • Archives •

Annual newsletter to be lauched WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated. Project news: Project news from WP:CRIC including the list of Awards presented in 2024 and the final results of Contests held in 2024. Article news: Article news from WP:CRIC including list of FAC, FLC, FPC, PR, GAN, ITN, RD etc. from 2024. Cricket news: Summary of International Cricket events took place in 2024 from T20 World Cups to WTC pathway. You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You! Upcoming contests Cricket Picture of the Year 2024: Nominations will open up in mid-October. Cricket WikiContest 2025: More details will be revealed soon. Visit the contests page for the latest information. Ongoing discussions A discussion about merging the child WikiProjects WP:IPL, WP:BPL, WP:PSL and WP:LPL back into WP:CRIC as taskforces is currently ongoing in the project talk page. • Contribute to the newsletter • Subscribe to the newsletter • Join the WikiProject • Project discussions • Contests • You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 Nominations open from 15 to 31 October 2024 • Organized by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Contests • Mailing list • CPOTY 2024 • • Contest coordinators: AssociateAffiliate and Vestrian24Bio •

– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]