Hello. I object to your action on this image, on several counts.

• The image size was well within the guidelines at WP:IMAGERES.
• The rationale for the image size was explained clearly on the talk page and in the FUR.
• All requirements were met as per IMAGERES.
• Did you even read the talk page thread? You certainly didn't add a word there.
• Your upload is not an improvement. You have substantially reduced the visual impact by cropping off a large part of the wing of the aircraft.
• As I understand it, it is your function to ensure that guidelines are followed (they were), not to override the editorial judgment of the editors working on an article. Do I have that wrong? ―Mandruss ☎ 18:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see your revert. Thank you very much! ―Mandruss ☎ 18:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avianca Flight 52, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flaps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Juneau Mike (talk) 01:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've posted an update to this section. Specifically, "I concur in the closing of this discussion. Ideally, User:Michaelh2001 should have posted to AN or ANI to request an uninvolved closure of the debate. However, as there was only one dissenting opinion over the course of a month, and I find a lack of consensus in the debate, it is determined that there is no consensus to perform the merge.". Thanks, Nakon 06:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if you saw the comments at here? Hmmm, I seem to recall more on the FAC page. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to help anon members with a deletion discussion but a ten year user can open those adequately so feel free if you think it should be deleted to nominate at AFD. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have nominated American Airlines Flight 77, a featured article you nominated, as TFA. Please see Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/American Airlines Flight 77. Regards, sovereign°sentinel 07:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 1305 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:12, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I requested assistance at the Dispute Resolution noticeboard. Dontmakemetypepasswordagain (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your caption is fine (and quite accurate). Thanks for doing that, Mathsci (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Veggies! Your name has come up a lot on my watchlist lately due to your work on photo templates on the talk pages of school articles. I just undid one of your edits, to Talk:Seneca Academy and Circle School. Talk pages of pages that have been redirected are not redirected to the talk page of the target of the redirect on the article page. They are left as is to preserve any record of why the page was redirected. Of course removing photo requested templates is fine, as would be changing the class to "redirect". If you've done any more of them, please undo them. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon: Thanks for letting me know. I had done that to some other article talk-pages. Those have now been reverted. I was under the impression that if there was nothing but templates on the talk page (no actual "talk"), I could redirect. Thanks for letting me know. -- Veggies (talk) 17:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Philadelphia train crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Philadelphia train crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warning. I will refer to edit consensus in the future.Messiaindarain (talk) 09:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been a couple editors who have been mass deleting sourced content from the Art Renewal Center WP page. Please help protect this page from disruptive editing. ArtMajor (talk) 00:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 2017 Delaware earthquake, Veggies!

Wikipedia editor Gatemansgc just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Largest earthquake in the history of Delaware, previous was a 3.8. Therefore, this is likely to be notable, despite the "weak" magnitude compared to California earthquakes. The one 6 years ago continued notability.

To reply, leave a comment on Gatemansgc's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Gatemansgc (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

-- [[User:Veggies|Veggies]] ('''''[[User talk:Veggies|<font color="blue" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]'''''): -- Veggies (talk)

to

-- [[User:Veggies|Veggies]] (''[[User talk:Veggies|<b style="color: blue; font-family: Times New Roman;">talk</b>]]''): -- Veggies (talk)

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 01:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2017 Delaware earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not newsworthy, very small magnitude

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wykx (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've recently removed a graph of isotopes from several articles. Such large changes should typically be discussed first, especially when the reason for them is not apparent. I invite you to start a discussion about what you find problematic in the graph at WT:ELEMENTS, so either the image can be fixed, or the problem understood and remedied. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Headbomb: Thank you. I started a discussion listing my issues with it here if you would like to address them. We can move it to a more appropriate forum if you prefer. -- Veggies (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_3CTAg668hojR9vT&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 13:27, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	DEAR VEGGIES
	Hello Veggies is it possible for you to change that one about the person. As described he has consulted a number of professors here in Australia and overseas. The article is about a person who is notable as his been in the newspaper previously. Kikkoman01 (talk) 13:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Thank you
	He has contacted many people writing the newspaper and has also appeared in an Australian newspaper. Kikkoman01 (talk) 13:37, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Veggies. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Franck Ferrand, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: has an article on fr-wiki since 2006, so significance is likely. Thank you. SoWhy 14:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Veggies. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Inbet games, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subject might be important/significant (see also Google News/Books hits for this subject) / use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead to allow other editors to participate in this decision. Thank you. SoWhy 12:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw you spotted a whole bunch of image copyright violations. Thanks for that! When they are very obvious copyright violations, it isn't really necessary to go through FFD. In the future, you could tag them for speedy deletion with an explanation instead of a URL. I've done that for these images. Cheers. -- Whpq (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: Yeah, the only thing is that CSD forces me to put in a URL and I don't want to research every specific URL in Google Earth or Maps for each image. Can I just put a generic URL in like earth.google.com or maps.google.com? -- Veggies (talk) 21:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in my post, stick in an explanation instead of a URL. I know the parameter says URL, but you can stick in an explanation and admins seem to find this acceptable as I've not run across any objections when I've done it. -- Whpq (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see you wrote that. Sorry. Thank you. -- Veggies (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the above article, tweets made by the subject or about the subject are not relevant to the subject's entire life or necessary to accurately describe the situation the subject is currently in. There is no need to add the tweets when they are generally mentioned in the article itself. The case may be different if the tweets were somehow central and necessary for a reader's understanding of the article, but that is not the case here. Going further, why these tweets, what makes them special of all of the tweets she allegedly made? As far as the president's tweet, he has made thousands of tweets on both sides of numerous issues. Yet, we do not add his tweets to every article or subject he touches.

Also, one of the tweets is picked up by Google as the article synopsis and instead of giving a brief preview of the article, the following is what Google is showing when you search for the subejct:

Allahumma barik there are soooo many Aussies and Brits here but where are the Americans, wake up u cowards. Jan 7, 2015 ...

Please restore my edit. KnightLago (talk) 00:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I never received a response so I went ahead and restored my edit. When you return please feel free to contact me if you would still like to discuss. KnightLago (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re this: if you know about galleries, please do try that instead of this cryptic (non-wiki-familiar) approach that breaks it so badly. Dicklyon (talk) 04:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the table format is not workable when there are too many images across a page. I'll try the gallery template... Dicklyon (talk) 05:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in mainland China, you may be blocked from editing. The above includes abetting IPs on the matter. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 01:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

​ Any more of your nonsense and I'm going to report you to an admin. Consider this your final warning. -- Veggies (talk) 01:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then don't template me for what is regular anti-vandalism patrolling. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 01:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

​ That user did not post vandalism. Read WP:TPO. You can't delete talk page comments, even if you disagree with them. If you don't like that, too bad. -- Veggies (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All sustained WP:NOTFORUM violations are considered vandalism: their verbal diarrhea had nothing remotely to do with discussing improvements to the article. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 02:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

​ Wrong on all counts. That may have been an opinionated comment, but it wasn't vandalism in the least. Which is why you're not going to revert it. 😁 -- Veggies (talk) 02:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another load of nonsense demonstrating no comprehension of WP:NOTFORUM. And I still get notified of {{Hidden ping}}, there's no need for the pretense of politeness. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 02:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

​ Then, go ahead and revert it. Don't you enjoy getting blocked? 😏 -- Veggies (talk) 02:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere as much as having the delusion to believe a minor Richter scale 4.1 earthquake warrants notability for its own article, only to face the embarrassment of watching it be !voted unanimously "Delete" merely months later. Or, the pleasure induced by bloviating for the Tea Party, reviled outside the U.S. for its extremist and violent tendencies. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 02:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

​ See? Now you're getting it: this is soapboxing, but not vandalism. You're making progress! 👍 -- Veggies (talk) 02:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to do with the IP's WP:NOTFORUM violations, and we're not posting on an article or template talk page, but nice try at being snide. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 02:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The removed IP edit does somewhat fall under WP:NOTFORUM as not particularly relevant (albeit tangentially trying to make a slightly related point) to the discussed topic. At the same time, while NOTFORUM violations are subject to removal, they do not fall under vandalism. There’s no more issue here. More importantly, both of you need to stop the taunting. — MarkH₂₁^talk 02:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Q.E.D. -- Veggies (talk) 02:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

QED indeed, you don't get to selectively apply WP:NOTFORUM, and the IP I reported was blocked after all. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 19:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete your comment, did I? -- Veggies (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not about comment removal, but this sort of deflection is no surprise. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 19:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremy-Hector.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rarest element. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 21#Rarest element until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Longest sea beach in the world. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 1#Longest sea beach in the world until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Bolungarvik Pano from Avalanche Dam.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 22:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should merge the articles into August 2020 Lebanon Explosion as new section Personisgaming (talk) 13:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events as you have done edits on Portal:Current events. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to inform you about that and hope you join. Elijahandskip (talk) 12:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

Thank you today for United Airlines Flight 93, and it hasn't happened before that TFA day was also Precious memory day! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

––FormalDude talk 07:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, working through setting up the October POTD stuff, and hit an issue here, insofar as Bolungarvík is nearly uncited, but content on the main page has to be cited. How d'ye want to work through this? I can try to help once I finish getting a bit further ahead on POTD, but am kind of busy at the moment (I'm worried about how busy I'm going to be for a few months, so want to get well ahead). Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 11:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden I did some cleanup work on the article, and was able to put together a blurb based on stuff I was able to cite. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:46, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Veggies,

This is to let you know that File:Bolungarvik Pano from Avalanche Dam.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 17, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-06-17. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox hiking trail has been nominated for renaming to Template:Infobox trail. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's talk page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I looked into that bit you removed as unsourced and found that it did have a cite, the Empire article we use at five points in the article, but the cite was removed on style grounds, since the paragraph cited that source too often.

I've restored that bit and the cite, and the sentence after it which also lost its cite and met the same fate. That cool? --Kizor 21:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​I mean, I suppose that it suffices for Wikipedia's purposes. The problem that remains is: this is a claim about the New York Post. I'd like a direct citation to the NYP article in question, not a secondary source about another publisher's claims. Also: that particular citation is, unfortunately, rather weak. There's no cited author, no clear issue number. It isn't helped by the fact that the article isn't available online (even behind a paywall). As it stands, though, I'm not going to futz with it anymore. Thanks for providing the citation. -- Veggies (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sums it up. --Kizor 02:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I object to your reverts and mass deletion endeavours of new wikimedian illustration everywhere, to me it is not constructive towards the people who have spent hours drawing illustrations for the various projects. Hyruspex (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your objections have already been raised at WP:NORN, but appear to be in the minority. Zaathras (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Template Barnstar
		For adding roads to Template:Israeli-Palestinian conflict detailed map and bringing it up to speed with the October 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict. Tradediatalk 23:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe before writing out tedious, verbose talkpage comments, you should read this. There is clearly no consensus to include the footage in the article, and therefore it shouldn't be included. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia: Feel free to take this to WP:ANI if you want. -- Veggies (talk) 23:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area editors are limited to 1 revert per article per day. However, at 2023 Israel–Hamas war you have exceeded this, making the following reverts:

1. 13:08, 16 October 2023
2. 13:31, 16 October 2023
3. 23:35, 16 October 2023
4. 02:44, 17 October 2023

Note that for our purposes, The term "revert" is defined as any edit (or administrative action) that reverses or undoes the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, and whether performed using undo, rollback, or done so completely manually. A series of consecutively saved reverting edits by one user, with no intervening edits by another user, counts as one revert.

Please self-revert any edits you can currently revert, to come as close to compliance with the restriction as possible, and in the future please be careful about any reverts that you make. BilledMammal (talk) 02:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BilledMammal: The final one was a self-revert of the third one and first two were separate de-inclusions of different photos that could well have been done in a single edit (but weren't to avoid an edit-conflict on a highly edited article). -- Veggies (talk) 02:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're right; I misread what 23:35 was (it wasn't a revert, AFAIK), and 02:44 was a self revert of your own edit. Technically, 13:08 and 13:31 were separate reverts, but only technically. BilledMammal (talk) 03:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, apologies for removing your comment. Unfortunately, it answered a rather clear violation of NOTAFORUM. Obviously your intentions were the best, but could I suggest removing rather than answering comments that are in clear breach of policy. Keep up the good work, much appreciated! Jeppiz (talk) 22:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to thank you for catching my error on Talk:Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion. I didn't realize that was Jimbo Wales. Facepalm... Was just doing my job of WP:NOTAFORUM clearing and didn't realize it was him. Thanks for reverting! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Super Ninja2 and WP:NOTGETTINGIT. Thank you. The Kip 22:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for going through all these, but having seen these in my watchlist and having previously admired how the Israeli localities have their populations updated yearly, I thought it would be a better idea to start a template that has the latest Palestinian census figures so they can be centrally updated as needed. If you want to do that instead of going through each article, I started the template at User:Nableezy/sandbox. Just need each line to have locality name = population. nableezy - 03:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy: Yeah, it'd be cool if there was an auto-script to update this (with references) from a CSV or something. The list is the Palestinian census for 2017. I don't know how to push a script through, though. -- Veggies (talk) 04:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I extracted the 2017 census, but need to go through to make sure the names match up with how we have them. You can see an example of how it would work in an article at User:Nableezy/Sandbox. nableezy - 04:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy: Cool. I finished at page 76 in the report with the Jerusalem Governate and stopped at the Bethlehem Governate. That governate through the end is all that's left to complete. Let me know if you figure it out. Thanks. -- Veggies (talk) 04:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is to notify you that one of your edits is under discussion at Talk:2023 Israel–Hamas war#Gaza Strip (under Israeli Control) for being original research. You were pinged in the discussion, but this is a talk page notification, as pings may not work. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you started adding in cities under control of the Ramallah administration in the West Bank at Template:Israeli-Palestinian conflict detailed map and this is highly appreciated; I assume you're going to finish it off by adding in Palestinian settlements in the Hebron and Jericho areas as well.

My question is, are you going to add in Israeli settlements for the full picture? Thanks in advance. TheMapLurker (talk) 21:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheMapLurker:Yes, definitely. It's a work in progress. Also (eventually) the towns and villages within Israel. I've just been going down the latest Palestinian census, village by village. Next will be the Israeli settlements. -- Veggies (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Where are you getting your coordinates from? Zero^talk 03:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Zero0000:The coordinates for villages and points of interest, etc? If something looks off-center on OpenStreetMap, I try to get the most centralized coordinate from Google Maps. -- Veggies (talk) 03:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some users on the article are consistently reverting a map to a revision previous to the 27 October one. I am currently not available on my PC, I would appreciate if you could take a look at this dispute. Talk:2023 Israel–Hamas war#Map update Ecrusized (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An admin (user Sadads) has rightfully pointed to the fact that File:October 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict.svg is a problem for colorblind people. Could you change the red on the map into light green to match the color on the template map? Tradedia^talk 00:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:OldWawaseeDam.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, unclear where exactly this is - Old Wawasee Dam yields no useful results, source link dead

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheImaCow: The image was used a very long time ago as the basis for this image, which is used on an article. The link must have died in the intervening years, but it is a USGS photo. -- Veggies (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, thanks for the information! I removed the prod-tag and moved the image to Commons. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]