Is it possible to create a page on the future of biodiversity on Earth or has it already been done? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicki breazeale (talk • contribs) 15:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, since it appears you are having difficulty with Wiki, I suggest you use the Article Wizard and use Live Chat to speak to other editors on getting your articles in Wiki w/o them being speedy deleted. Tyros1972 Talk 17:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I believe I submitted information on National Geographic's inclusion of Great Wilderness work on it's web page.

Please advise me as to what I should do next.

Thanks

Vicki Breazeale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicki breazeale (talk • contribs) 20:12, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I've removed that line (that seems to be somewhat contentious) from INgrooves and thought I should explain why. You and I have discussed that claim in the past and that line in particular but we are still waiting for a reliable source to verify it. We really can't keep an allegation like that in an article without a reliable source and adding a {{citation needed}} template to the end as an acknowledgement that there isn't one really isn't sufficient. Multiple IPs (even if they are the same person) have now disputed that claim for which we still haven't been able to provide a source. I've had another look today and still can't find anything beyond the blogs and forums we've had from the start. As soon as you find one, back in it goes. But until then, it should probably be removed. Yeah? Stalwart111 13:10, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

I have no problem with that as I have no opinion on the article or company except I am leaning toward that statement as being false to be honest with you. The only reason I reverted those was there was {{citation needed}} and I thought it had to be discussed on talk page? Tyros1972 Talk 13:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I actually figured as much. Absolutely, it should be discussed, but it probably shouldn't be there while it is discussed. The article names individuals and accuses their company of particular things (without a source) which becomes a WP:BLP issue. If it is true, there will likely be a strong source for it eventually. If not, we can relax knowing we've done the right thing. But a technicality and yeah, I didn't think you'd have any particular objection. Cheers, Stalwart111 14:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining that and yes it makes sense and I agree. Tyros1972 Talk 16:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

This topic is my subject. I found the pages on Wikipedia and the pages need editing but I have no time to do it now. But I will try to do it soon.

Best regards,

Vicki Breazeale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicki breazeale (talk • contribs) 00:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Some of your uploads may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since July. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

This was settled a long time ago. The website owned e-mailed wiki and it was cleared. I don't have time or interest to fight this as it is not my concern. I did not create the article for any other reason except it was a notable cause, other then that I don't have time to protect the logo. Do what you wish with it. Tyros1972 Talk 18:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

According to Commons:Commons:OTRS/backlog, all e-mails older than 7 days have been processed. Your uploads were uploaded more than 7 days ago, so it would seem that the copyright holders either didn't send any e-mail or that they didn't make it possible to find out which file(s) the permisison(s) applied to. Try asking at WP:OTRS/N, or if that doesn't work, make sure that the copyright holder sends an appropriate permission statement. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/new media rights, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/test07113, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/test07113, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It is a rejected submission at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over a year. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —rybec 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Tyros1972. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "new media rights".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/new media rights}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mega Man (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• american-mega-man-tv-show|publisher=Anime News Network|accessdate=12 June 2013}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|title=Discotek Store Mega Man Cartoon|url=http://www.discotekmedia.com/mega_man.htm</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:35thdvd cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Album tubebar35.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Album tubebarCE2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Album tubebarbootleg2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Album tubebarbootleg2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Album D3b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

The article New Media Rights has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about an organization that seems to be part of California Western School of Law, cited only to a blog. It is unclear what its claim to notability is. Article is unimproved after 18 months and still orphaned. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)