Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh#Placename changes and Wikipedia policy to understand why Wikipedia uses the

it does. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Chittagong. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Chittagong, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I change it to its official name I didn't do anything wrong Therealbey (talk) 17:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is wrong to change it to the official name. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain how ? And don't say people use it so Wikipedia should also. No people say what they want to say but Wikipedia should be updated from the Acts of official government Therealbey (talk) 18:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Chittagong Division. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

explain why plz Therealbey (talk) 21:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained, in edit summaries, at Talk:Chittagong, and above in this section, but you do not seem to be listening. When I've finished cleaning up the mess you've made, I'll explain again, at Talk:Chittagong because that is the more central location for a discussion. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andh Bhakt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andh Bhakt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

च҉न҉्҉द҉्҉र҉ ҉व҉र҉्҉ध҉न҉ Message 20:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't not think so it should be deleted it. In Wikipedia there should be all. If you are supporter of BJP so it doesn't mean every thing should be in your favor. There is no reason to delete this page and other articles like Adarsh liberal or Pseudo-secular this should remain. Therealbey (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andh Bhakt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andh Bhakt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PepperBeast (talk) 02:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emre bey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslavian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emre Bey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emre Bey. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Waker-uz-Zaman is not the name of the interim government. He did not event create any interim government as the interim government is not finalized even. And even he does, Waker is not the head of this interim. Students want to make Yunus as the interim government head. Please wait for several days to confirm the interim government. In that time, you should edit this in the draft space. Mehedi Abedin 23:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pinaki Bhattacharya, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Interim Government of Waker uz Zaman has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8 § Interim Government of Waker uz Zaman until a consensus is reached. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 05:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Foreign secretary (Kerala) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/thiruvananthapuram/kerala-govt-appoints-vasuki-as-foreign-secretary-in-state/articleshow/111876006.cms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Chittagong, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 00:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you moved chattogram to Chittagong I have disclosed the reason in Talk:Chattogram. I have moved the page from Chittagong to Chattogram as it is the official name by the government of Bangladesh and also locally used most and according to Google trends Chattogram is the most used name. I am moving according to WP:COMMONNAME Therealbey (talk) 00:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealbey: The answer I've given at Talk:Chittagong Division#Move to Chattogram Division also applies here. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Ibrahim of the Ottoman Empire. -- That name is the result of a consensus that has established that in this specific case it is more correct to use the definite article. If you do not agree, open a move request and gain consensus, but stop moving the page unilaterally. Sira Aspera (talk) 07:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Salman Fazlur Rahman. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia.
In your own edit summary, you wrote "commonly known as Salman F Rahman", which is correct - reliable sources overwhelmingly refer to him with his middle initial. Yet you violated the middle names and initials section of the encyclopedia's naming conventions for people by moving the article to Salman Fazlur Rahman, claiming that the title using his middle initial is "misspelled". --Worldbruce (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently performing controversial page moves instead of properly requesting them.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Therealbey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I moved those pages with discussion on their talk page like in , Talk:Ibrahim of the Ottoman Empire and Talk:Chittagong And then I moved those pages. after furthermore discussion on Chittagong I got the valid reason to remain it as Chittagong And then I do not try ever to move it. But I didn't get the valid reason for Ibrahim of the Ottoman Empire But my reason was valid till user:sira Aspera give the reason. And for Salman F Rahman I was unknown of WP:COMMONNAME And I thought This should be on his full name. And I ask apology for that. It was mistake by me. Please unblock me from editing and I will never do this kind of mistake in Future. This block will be a lesson for me. I ask for unblock. Therealbey (talk) 08:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked without a clear agreement to refrain from page moves in the future. Yamla (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Therealbey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Tell me how should I do the agreement Therealbey (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

All good, no formal agreement needed. Welcome back to Wikipedia; the only thing you can't do is moving pages. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell us that you agree. 331dot (talk) 17:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @ToBeFree: - would you object to changing this site wide block to a partial block stopping moves? PhilKnight (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi all, thanks for the ping and yes, that sounds fine to me. Actually, I'll just go ahead and implement it. I forgot it's a technical option by now when using the normal blocking interface, and perhaps it was a good idea to stop any kind of editing for a moment. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Therealbey, feel free to remove these messages including the unblock requests; they were just for our discussion and your information, and the matter has been resolved with a simple technical solution. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Therealbey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please I request to unblock me from moving pages . As a new user I regret for what I done and I ensure that I will not do anything like that ever. Moving pages is important while editing like if I create a page and I think it is wrong then I can't change it while I am blocked. And if I request it would take time also if I see a page doesn't have the right title after discussion on talk page I can't move it. Please I regret for what I don't please allow me to move pages and I 100% ensure that this kind of mistake will never happen ever.Therealbey (talk) 00:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think you should build up a track record of responsible page move discussions on talk pages to show the problems in your editing will not continue. PhilKnight (talk) 10:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Therealbey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please unblock me from moving pages. I want to move but I can't and it's my right. for unnecessary page moves you can't give me whole life block punishment it's too much for me. I am a new user I can do mistakes initially but for that you set a expiry at least you block me for whole life. I am very sorry for what I done and I ensure you I will not do this kind of mistake ever. Please unblock me or at least set a expiry Therealbey (talk) 7:01 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Declined. The ability to move pages is not a "right" and your ability to do so was curtailed as a condition for your unblocking. Build a track record of responsible page move discussions and then ask. Also, please note that repeatedly asking for the removal of the block from moving pages is disruptive and I strongly suggest you stop asking. RegentsPark (comment) 23:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign secretary (Kerala) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreign secretary (Kerala) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rashidun Caliphate, you may be blocked from editing. Note that this is the latest of many warnings you received, therefore you are at much higher risk of being blocked if you make more non-constructive edits like this. R Prazeres (talk) 17:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok I will ensure. Therealbey (talk) 04:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The curse of the eighth decade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A quotation from a psalm and a line that essentially repeats its content in prose cannot be considered encyclopedic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sira Aspera (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emre Bey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslavian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add more plot, information and actors who have recently joined Kuruluş: Osman season 6 عمر 154 (talk) 02:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kuruluş: Osman season 6. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kuruluş: Osman season 6, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ottoman Beylik, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Beshogur (talk) 14:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Therealbey. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Remal Cyclone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Caliphate. You have been previously warned many times about your editing behaviour and your recent editing history indicates that you continue to exercise poor judgement on this matter, both in your edits to article content and in your numerous creations of new articles about non-notable topics. I suggest you hold back from making major edits, learn more about Wikipedia's content policies, and discuss proposed changes on the the talk pages of articles you're interested in before you edit them. R Prazeres (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i did started a talk in caliphate page. Therealbey (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After being reverted, yes, and then you edited it again despite seeing that other editors criticized or opposed your edits. R Prazeres (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many editors should support that for a change on the page ? Therealbey (talk) 19:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really a question of how many. Please read WP:CONSENSUS. R Prazeres (talk) 20:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were given specific reasons citing site policy why your changes were not acceptable. You are not free to simply ignore those. Remsense ‥ 论 01:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You marked the page for speedy deletion as a duplicate of Yunus ministry. However, the page doesn't qualify for a speedy deletion. Please raise a merge request (see WP:MERGEINIT) if you think the pages are duplicates. Vpab15 (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashish Chanchlani (YouTuber) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Chanchlani (YouTuber) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jlwoodwa (talk) 00:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Therealbey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

plz unblock me from moving pages there are some pages which is needed to be moved. I Know few months ago I done wrong by moving pages unnecessary and without giving reason of it in talk pages but now i have understand how to move a page and process of it. I request to unblock me giving a 2nd chance.Therealbey (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not done the bare minumum of what has been requested of you to demonstrate that the block should be lifted.Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Therealbey: you were told you need to prove that you do understand site rules by requesting moves, such that you can show a more or less consistent track record of successful requests. Remsense ‥ 论 22:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Therealbey, can you show me three requested move discussions that you've initiated since your block that have been successful? -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  No maybe but if I get unblocked I will make sure that and won't do moves of big pages without discussing or coming to a consensus. Therealbey (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You were told very clearly what the terms were. We cannot simply take your word that you've learned, as you've been given several chances. You need to prove it first. Remsense ‥ 论 22:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• And while I'm here, can you also explain why you recreated an article with an alternate title to circumvent the salting of Ashish Chanchlani? An article you created with entire paragraphs of unsourced content, contrary to WP:BLP?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I was not sure why his page wasn't created as he is very famous celebrity then I saw his page was protected I thought there could any other reason for that I created Ashish Chanchalani YouTuber page to confirm it and does it get approval and now it was been reviewed and I was thinking to request it to move on Ashish Chanchlani Therealbey (talk) 22:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Why do you think it is acceptable to circumvent a mechanism that is meant to prevent the creation of a certain page without asking anyone first? Remsense ‥ 论 22:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  where and how ? I was supposed to ask ? And he is a famous celebrity so his page should been created that what was in my mind at that time. Therealbey (talk) 22:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  There are many places you could have asked, like the Help desk or Teahouse, or a relevant WikiProject like WikiProject YouTube or WP:WikiProject India.

  Please answer my question, though: that specific page was being prevented from being created, so why did you think it was acceptable to create it anyway under a different name? Remsense ‥ 论 22:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  yeah so that was protected on 2021 because of repeatedly creating I didn't knew the exact reason except the discussion led the deletation which I can't access anymore so to confirm that I do so . Therealbey (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  If "I didn't know the reason, so I thought it would be okay to try regardless" is your answer to my question above: since you have not shown any caution in your decision making regarding things that potentially make more work for other editors to do, this is why you have been blocked from making some of those decisions. Remsense ‥ 论 02:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Like how should I was suppose to know the exact reason ?As I was ready to put a request to move it to Ashish Chanchlani because it was reviewed and before that you guys deleted. Therealbey (talk) 17:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  If you need to learn more or how to do stuff, you can ask some questions to me. Since, you are a somewhat new editor, You have lots to learn, You can ask me and I Will help you. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 05:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The point I am hammering over and over is the article was prevented from being created for a reason, so you should not have done so without asking. In specific, it requires much more time and effort from other editors that have to discover what has happened, and then intervene at AfD to delete the article again—than if you had simply asked first. We are all volunteering our time here You presently do not seem to understand the degree to which certain behaviors are disruptive, if well-meaning, and that is why you have been prevented from performing an activity that has a particularly high potential for disruption—it requires editors with specific rights to notice what you have done and undo the move in many cases. That is not fair. Remsense ‥ 论 05:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That wasn't in my mind at that time. Ok, let me correct my mistake, then I will ask again for unblocking. Thanks Therealbey (talk) 10:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Do you need any help or have any important editing-related questions? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you. I am ok right now. Thank you for asking. Therealbey (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 10:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 13th Jatiya sangsad, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:12, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Lallantop. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and this is an unimproved duplicate of The Lallantop, which was repeatedly redirected by User:GSS, User:JalenBarks, User:DaxServer and User:WaddlesJP13. If you can improve this draft to meet WP:NWEB, then please feel free to submit it for review, and it can be merged to the correct title. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 19:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir Therealbey (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aminul Islam Rabel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aminul Islam Rabel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayor of Golapganj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor of Golapganj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JoshuaJ28. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Head of state seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia. To avoid edit war over adding images of personal favourites, 3 points and 2 criteria have to be considered:

Points:
1) GDP (in top 3, continent wise)
2) HDI (above 0.700)
3) Democracy index (classified as "electoral/liberal democracy") (or) Freedom in the World (classified as "free", use only if Democracy index data not available for the specific country)

Criteria:
1) Atleast an image should represent every single continent (except Antarctica), according to Template:Wikipedia continent-based projects
2) Atleast 3/9 images should represent women, according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red

All these points have to be satisfied in order to be included in the infobox. It's not random/personal choice. GDP and HDP point can be ignored only if it affects the continent/women criteria.

Marshall Islands added under women criteria although it did not satisfy the GDP point. The same procedure followed in Head of government in which Samoa added. And you removed both to add Bangladesh, which does not satisfy the requirements of procedure. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 02:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Salahuddin Farooqui. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Article is currently one sentence and the title of the article does not appear to match the content.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 17:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bruno pnm ars. I noticed that you recently removed content from Asif Mahmud without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.
Please review WP:P&G before making further edits on the mainspace. Bruno 🌹 (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did explain it in summery!? Therealbey (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I requested an "accurate edit summary." In your previous explanation, you mentioned being "inspired by Yariv Levin," an Israeli Knesset member who has held five different ministerial positions and other roles. However, Asif Mahmud, by contrast, has only held three advisory roles. Furthermore, this is not a matter of personal inspiration or preference. Per Wikipedia’s editing guidelines (WP:EP), the roles and titles of officeholders should not be altered based on individual interpretation. For consistency, please see article of other figures like Sheikh Hasina, Joe Biden, or Donald Trump, whose official titles are maintained without subjective modifications. Bruno 🌹 (talk) 06:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then why Yariv Levin page is like that ? Therealbey (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The structure of Yariv Levin's Wikipedia page is likely designed this way to reflect his varied roles in the Israeli government, rather than a single, long-term executive position. He’s held multiple ministerial and legislative positions, like Minister of Justice, Speaker of the Knesset, and Minister of Tourism, often concurrently or switching roles (very common in the Israeli political landscape). In a parliamentary system, it’s common for high-ranking politicians to have such diverse responsibilities, which is why his page focuses on his specific duties rather than office transitions or successors.

The article on Asif Mahmud shouldn’t be structured like Yariv Levin's because Mahmud’s role and career trajectory likely differ from Levin's in significant ways. Levin’s page format works because he’s held a series of varied, often concurrent roles in Israel’s parliamentary system, where it’s common for high-ranking politicians to move frequently between ministerial and legislative positions. This setup makes a broad, categorized structure suitable for quickly showing his influence across different areas without focusing on a continuous office or leadership term.

PS:If Mahmud’s career has been more focused or linear, or if he holds a longer-term position that defines his public role, a structure like Levin’s would make his page feel too scattered. For someone with a more straightforward path or a role with continuous responsibilities, it makes sense to use a format that highlights the timeline and key accomplishments of that position more clearly, rather than breaking it down by categories of roles or responsibilities. Bruno 🌹 (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Therealbey (talk) 19:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ulu al-ʿAzm a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.

This is especially problematic since you are currently blocked from moving pages the normal way. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 03:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to point this out. :) Also, I'm confused by the move from ʾUlu al-ʿAzm to Ulu al-ʿAzm: the page contents still use the Romanization "ʾUlu al-ʿAzm" with the modifier letter right half ring, and Unicode Inspector tells me that the Arabic (taken from the page contents) really does start with a hamza, so I don't understand why you'd remove it specifically from the page title. (Note I am very much not an Arabic-speaker myself.)

At the same time, I'm not sure if the article needs to exist at all. I don't see the title phrase even appearing on Arabic Wikipedia, for example. --Quuxplusone (talk) 16:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it's something that is not in Arabic Wikipedia but a widely known thing specially in Muslim community. Muslim scholars use this word to refer 5 high ranking prophets in Islam. And isn't (ء‎) U+0621? Therealbey (talk) 17:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(ء‎) is U+0621 ARABIC LETTER HAMZA; (أ) is U+0623 ARABIC LETTER ALEF WITH HAMZA ABOVE. The word أولو definitely begins with hamza and would be transliterated ʾUlu, right? (And the word اولو doesn't, and would be transliterated Ulu?) --Quuxplusone (talk) 04:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay with Aleef that's right right! I agree now it should be ʾUlu. It was mistake. Should I request move? Therealbey (talk) 20:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. IMHO since the original "move" was a cut-and-paste, it's fine for the "move back" to be a simple revert; so I did that myself; and then I merged in some improvements that had been made to the other copy in the short time since the "move." So everything's now in the correct state again, as far as I'm concerned. Now the article is at ʾUlu al-ʿAzm, and Ulu al-ʿAzm is a redirect again. --Quuxplusone (talk) 23:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thnx for helping on my mistake Therealbey (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Therealbey! It's an honor to message you, I truly appreciate your work. I'm looking for someone like you, great writer and experienced writing in Wiki, to write a biography on the founder and CEO of the company I work for. He's a coder building something revolutionary for the software development industry using AI. He worked for Microsoft and Accenture as a senior developer and consultant, has some press and quite the inspirational background. Would lobe for you to write it and post it, if this is something you can do, let's hop on a call. 12.189.54.26 (talk) 21:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can, but first I have to know: is your company covered in big, reliable press (non-promotional) and is the founder featured in big news, magazines, or books? Therealbey (talk) 23:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Adnan Rashid (historian). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have given much sources and in his YouTube channel he has more than 200k subscribers . Now can you explain which type of sources it needs? Therealbey (talk) 12:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of the four sources you provided, two are self-published and therefore not considered reliable. The other two are articles from sources categorized under WP:RSPISNOT, which do not align with the criteria outlined in WP:RELY. Bruno 🌹 (talk) 01:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I have given the sources Therealbey (talk) 02:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the sources that you provided are not WP:RELY. They are self published blogs and articles. Bruno 🌹 (talk) 09:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails to establish what the individual is notable for - noting blogsites, YouTube and primary sources are not reliable or acceptable references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adnan Rashid (historian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Therealbey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Therealbey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Remal Cyclone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rashidun Caliphate, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned many times about pushing edits that are not supported by reliable sources or by consensus. Prior to your latest edit, you had already been reverted multiple times and you still have not used the talk page. Under the circumstances, further non-constructive edits like this would justify a report to administrators. R Prazeres (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Science in the Quran and Hadiths, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rashidun Caliphate. You have been told countless times to stop pushing your personal opinion on Wikipedia and to restrict yourself to reliable sources. If you do something like this again, a report to WP:ANI is inevitable. R Prazeres (talk) 18:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So why can't I contribute if I have the sources? Therealbey (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Bashar al-Assad has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Anwegmann (talk) 04:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twelve revivers of Caliphate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genesis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have posted this on Twelve_revivers_of_Caliphate talk page. Thought you might like to know.. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 20:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see also the reaction of R Prazeres at the end of the post --Louis P. Boog (talk) 02:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]