• Archive 1. Tayste (edits) 20:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Archive 2 Tayste (edits) 21:42, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Bayesian—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for all the hard work you did improving editors contributions during the Art+Feminism edit-a-thon. Your efforts were much appreciated! Susan Tol (talk) 04:53, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. April+Further with Art+Feminism
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

Sorry, I didn't realize that "neurone" was the British spelling. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mos:lq. Since you had some involvement with the Mos:lq redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 00:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10 Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed! For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, Tayste! I'm sorry if I mixed something up there. As I am not a total expert in statistics, would you have an idea where one could integrate the term "regression weight" more properly or which redirect to use for it? Best wishes--Neufund (talk) 07:49, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Please ping me if you feel like commenting! Thanks.--Neufund (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Neufund: First step would be to search reliable sources (e.g. journal articles, stats books) for this specific term and see how it is used. Then check whether this topic is already covered in Wikipedia, perhaps with a synonym as the title. But to me it seems like the kind of phrase that might mean different things in different fields or contexts. Weighted least squares is one possible meaning; is that what you understand by the term? --Tayste (edits) 00:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your reaction. To answer your final question: When I added the term regression weight under Linear regression, I was referring especially to http://onlinestatbook.com/2/regression/multiple_regression.html, where it says: "The values of b (b1 and b2) are sometimes called "regression coefficients" and sometimes called "regression weights." These two terms are synonymous." — Thus, I felt a little confused about your revert… Kind regards--Neufund (talk) 19:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, about Fisher information and AIC, this is discussed by Burnham & Anderson [2002: §7.7.8 ("Kullback–Leibler Information Relationship to the Fisher Information Matrix")]. There are also some remarks at Fisher information#Relation_to_relative_entropy. SolidPhase (talk) 04:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, clearly I have more reading to do on this matter! Tayste (edits) 08:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tayste. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page guidelines do not give you permission to put things back on people's talk page that they have removed. Did you violate the guidelines out of ignorance or malice? 82.132.220.10 (talk) 09:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the IP is a sock of a community-banned user whose CV is found at WP:LTA/BKFIP. Favonian (talk) 10:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Other IP addresses appear to be used by the same user, e.g. 82.132.222.241, and perhaps should be treated the same? Tayste (edits) 21:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked the 82.132.220.0/22 range for a day. A longer block would probably result in too much collateral damage. Favonian (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi, you recently deleted a significant portion of the H. thoracica page and listed the reason as "Please be careful not to make such drastic changes". What exactly is the issue with making large changes? Is there a specific rule against this? I'm fairly new so this has confused me, especially since the drastic changes seemed to be a significant improvement.

Many thanks in advance. AxonsArachnida (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tayste, today you made this edit on the Copula page. The edit supersedes the one that I'd made just previously here. In principle, I defer to whatever style I can stomach as long as it has some grammatical justification. It seems you don't apply that same principle. In this case, your edit agrees with my style sense better than the way I left the verbiage. Thanks for doing what I'm generally hesitant to do and for resisting the knee-jerk response of others who simply revert stuff.
That being said, I'm inclined to revert the edit that you made here. You justified your edit with "avoid WP:REFERS in the opening sentence; we're talking about copulas, not the word copula." The salient issue is that the word, "copula," is a term that relates not only to words but also to phrases - a point that you left undisturbed in the article. As the article now stands: "A copula is a word ... such as the word is ... or the phrase is not being," which doesn't quite make sense. Although you're right that the WP:REFERS protocol applies to a sentence like, "Milwaukee is the name of a city in Wisconsin" versus "Milwaukee is a city in Wisconsin," the article indeed relates to the linguistics term, "copula," not the word (i.e. lexeme), copula. So, to avoid belaboring the WP:REFERS issue, I'd be satisfied with, "A copula is a word or phrase that..." How about it? The relevant footnote is then left to address the "term" point. --Kent Dominic 07:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kent Dominic (talk • contribs)

Thank you for taking the time to consider how the REFERS guideline applies here and for contacting me about it. To be honest, my edit was done in a bit of a hurry and so I might have missed the flow-on effect later in the paragraph. I will defer to your understanding of linguistics then. Tayste (edits) 00:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll change it to the second of the two abovementioned alternatives and see how it flies. Cheers. --Kent Dominic·(talk) 06:55, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my edit with no reason given here. Why? Cell Danwydd (talk) 11:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I'd give an explanation for my edits to the PDQ Bach section of Peter Schickele. In a prose list of items, if an individual item has a comma in it, you separate the items with semicolons to clarify and avoid confusion. See MOS:SEMICOLON. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 21:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, it's awkward. Perhaps it can be worded better by splitting into several sentences or with parenthetical diversions rather than comma diversions. Tayste (edits) 21:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those sound more awkward to me than delineating the list with semicolons, to be honest. Black Yoshi (Yoshi! | Yoshi's Eggs) 22:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Didn't notice it had a url= generating an additional link. J JMesserly (talk) 04:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Molten Ring. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 18#Molten Ring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you guide me on how to edit correctly I don’t understand what I did wrong? First time it said I had no sources, links I added it now you removed it. I’m not sure what’s the problem? Thanks for your help. TLONZ (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on your talk page. Might take me a couple days to give you more specific advice, sorry. Tayste (edits) 20:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I figured the statement had something to do with the pair not containing a white key note name adjacent to another a half-step away. However, this being an obscure statement bordering on trivia, it should probably have a reference (obviously I don't know of any). Mapsax (talk) 23:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree it needs a reference. Perhaps enharmonic is the best place to find that, or at least a definition that makes it clear. It's trivia, true, but interesting enough for inclusion, I think. Tayste (edits) 23:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about that statement again...I guess it depends on the legitimacy or not of triple sharps. Mapsax (talk) 00:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did ponder that too. I note that enharmonic doesn't mention triple sharps/flats, so I'd be inclined to ignore that technicality. Tayste (edits) 00:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

However, sharp (music) and flat (music) do, though admittedly sharing a single source. Mapsax (talk) 01:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tayste. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Debra Chantry-Taylor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you thinking of coming along? Would be great to have you join in. Schwede66 00:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yes I'm looking into how it fits with our summer plans. It would be fun and a good chance to have a look around that part of the country. Tayste (edits) 00:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand (WANZ) members.

We invite you to consider standing for the WANZ Committee at our AGM 22 April 2024 to help shape and influence events and decisions.

The role of Secretary will be vacant. We are also interested in succession planning for the future.  Please email info@wikimedia.nz for the Secretary Job Description, and the document outlining the relationship and tasks between the Secretary and the Executive Advisor position, as the Executive Advisor is now picking up day-to-day administration tasks from the Secretary.

If you would like to come along to a meeting and watch the committee in action before deciding whether to stand please reach out.

If you are interested and want to know more please contact our President Victoria Leachman by calling 021 490 329 or emailing president@wikimedia.nz.

Warm regards

Victoria Leachman (President) CopperAlchemy (talk) 02:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tayste. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Therapeutic Products Act 2023, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect MOS: OVERLINKING has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § MOS: OVERLINKING until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect MOS: OVERLINKING has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8 § MOS: OVERLINKING until a consensus is reached. Queen of Hearts ^talk 20:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]