You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Syran Mbenza. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 08:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Syran Mbenza, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 06:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sullidav. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Syran Mbenza.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Syran Mbenza}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm John from Idegon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hawken School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is not an extension of the school's webpage. If secondary sources do not exist, it most likely does not belong in the article John from Idegon (talk) 06:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rhapsody (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. Gorgeous. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nyboma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Shawcross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commentary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:AnomieBOT/Archive 12#"citation needed" when fact had a citation. I apologise my lazy selection of template, which I have now corrected.

There is indeed a citation, but the citation itself is vague, because it does not tell us what it means by "New Voices". I have recently disambiguated the page because many of the inbound links to New Voices were not intended for New Voices (magazine), the former primary topic, but for something else. In most cases it was trivial to understand what was intended, but for Oster, I could not find anything else, like any mention on the website of New Voices magazine, or just a statement that she is Jewish, to connect her to it. I could have just unlinked it, but that would bury the problem, so I wanted to flag it up in case another editor can source clarification. --Monxton (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Right that the CV at Yale.edu just lists among her board memberships "New Voices, 1999-2004" without saying which "New Voices". The Jewish college students' journal seems likely, but I saw no source confirming that. Sullidav (talk) 16:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barnett-Aden Gallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sullidav! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to deal with evident errors in sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sullidav! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Follow-up to How to deal with evident errors in sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sullidav! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Example of Citation Overkill?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great article. I am a huge Dan Chaon fan and I have glossed over his work related to Sheila because it is so difficult to read. I can read his brutal fiction (which has been life-changing for me) without melting into tears. Very odd. But beside the point! Thank you for writing an article on a writer so incredibly deserving. JSFarman (talk) 00:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sullidav. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Maria Thomas, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:47, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks OrangeMike. I will be totally open. I have a relationship with Maria Thomas and here is its entirety. I met her once at a bookstore reading and signing event in about 1988, maybe a year and a half before her death, and I bought a book by her and she signed it, inscribed to me, and it's still in my basement. We were among a bunch of people hanging out in the same bookstore for about an hour. Also I think she's a terrific writer, at risk of being forgotten. who belongs in an encyclopedia. Last, my current employer was her husband's employer: the US government. I can't imagine any of this as a conflict but tell me if you disagree.

I have no relationship with her son other than reaching out to him two days ago about this page, I have never met him and never contacted him before two days ago. First, I asked if he was ok with me creating the page. If he did not want there to be a page about his mother, I would not publish one, out of respect for his wishes. Somebody else could but I wouldn't. I also want to make sure the first draft had no egregious errors that could discredit it to someone who knew her life. I also asked whether he can give any information that would help me compile his mother's bibliography, eg, point me to reliable sources that would identify some short stories she published which I had not found, since I want this listing of her published works to be as complete as possible. I did ask whether or not he wants his name in the article, in a line from the draft "her son[, name]". Of course his name is in public sources that are cited so anybody else could add or delete that name once the article is published, but I asked and will follow his preference in the first published version. I asked whether for any other concerns or reactions, including on style. Last, for my own information and better understanding, not to change the article which would be original research, I asked him about some of the chronology of her life where sources are silent or vague or contradictory.

Finally, I'm writing this draft article on my own behalf, as a private individual. As always, I'll do my best to be consistent with the content policies. Sullidav (talk) 11:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maria Thomas. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Theroadislong. I am nearly finished and will probably submit tomorrow. Contrary to what I wrote to you elsewhere, I will hit the "submit draft for review" button rather than just popping the article into Wikipedia mainspace, as I have done for most recent articles I wrote. Your review will be welcome. Sullidav (talk) 02:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong - thanks again - submitted! Sullidav (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Thomas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 06:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Maria Thomas article is wonderful! JSFarman (talk) 18:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, JSFarman! Sullidav (talk) 03:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry for the delayed acknowledgement; I need to archive my talkpage.)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sullidav,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Kellis parker, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 03:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren: Thanks. Please do. I initially put my new article in the wrong place, and moved it to the right place. Sullidav (talk) 03:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sullidav. Thank you for your work on Pableaux Johnson. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thanks for the compliment, and for your - surely thankless and neverending - work to review new pages. It seems funny that my two most recent new articles were both reviewed today, one (Kellis Parker) four days after I added it to Wikipedia and this one six and a half months afterward. Sullidav (talk) 03:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, different reviewers work in different places at different times. Since many look at and leave the toughest articles for others, the older spots in the que tend to have more tougher-to-review articles. But newer articles are sometimes "not settled yet". Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]