Hi -- you put my page Michelle Hinn up for speedy deletion while I was still writing it. Now that it is finished, I believe it's ok but I'm not sure.

Thank you for your clean up on the Google Bomb article ;) --Aviper2k7 20:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Google bomb. For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Hello. I'd like to start mediation of this case, so I'd appreciate it if you'd mail me with an e-mail address that I can use to keep communications private. Thank you for your time. —Xyrael / 20:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From VRGRRL: I just emailed you just to let you know. I didnt know that I could create a user bio page -- that would be ok with me if it's not appropriate for me to have a regular wikipedia page.

Justin Eiler 21:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Request for Advocation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the FAQs page, WP:AMAFAQ. Good luck, and please consult my talk page for more information --Anthonycfc (Talk to Me) (s) (e) 20:45 19/Oct/2006 (UTC)

That is just the point he was a very notable Banjo player, you must first know about the history of American music to know that, something you seem to know nothing about. As a matter of fact his brother was very notable as well, and so are other members of the Paul Whiteman Orchestra. Again one would dispute that having little appreciation for the history of American music. He wasn't a nobody? did you play with Billie Holliday? do you even know who Billie Holliday is? Do you know anything about Paul Whiteman? Are you an expert in music?

You see this? Go down to P? Now what is the reasoning behind you spending your energy and making me waste my having to explain myself? List of banjo players

I never thought giving pops a little recognition by writing a stub about him would be so hard, especially here on the people's encyclopedia but I guess even here, ignorance reigns. I'll tell you what I'm going to do. I'm going to delete the whole article just to make you happy. From now on I will focus my energy into writing articles on why fascism is bad for education.

Now how do you know I don't have permission from the writer that wrote a biography on my own great grand father? Are you trying to make this personal?

Michael Pingitore was a notable musician whose talent contributed a great deal to Jazz music. he was a member of the renowned Paul Whiteman Orchestra.

Thanks for the nomination on In the Blood. I've proposed a few other "upcoming" film articles for deletion as well. You can find them at my link repository labeled with "(P.D.)". If you want, feel free to check them out and nominate (or remove) the proposed the deletion. --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 21:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with my arcticle on Kuruksastra? I'm afraid I'm new to contributuing to Wikipedia and I don't understand the guidelines. Raghuvansh r 08:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)raghuvansh_r[reply]

I wonder if it would be a little kinder to casual or aspiring Wikipedians if articles you review were flagged for improvement and not deletion. Certainly many of your flagging choices are correct, but perhaps you should investigate the circumstances (is it a new Wikipedian? Did the editor of a sparse article already flag it as a stub?) when deciding how to flag? I ask this in the spirit of good faith and community-building. --Erielhonan 10:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would concur. I have been around for a while, but have done realatively few article entries. Last night I saved a work in progress as an article, as I was not familiar with "Sandboxes." The article had literally been out there less than a minute when you proposed it for deletion. Which tells me that you did nothing to validate whether or not the article might be notable. It was a shock when I made a quick change and refreshed. The article, even in its rough draft form, should have had enough to cause you one to ask, "might there be something to this individual." See David Coderre. But my impression from looking at your webpage is that you tend to speedy delete too quickly (EG Deletion Patrol.) Balloonman 14:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes please - I have just seen the note you kindly put on my talk page - but the speedy deletion has already happened. Nexus is very notable - as was explained in the (admittedly short) article - and I could have expanded if it was not already deleted.

Where do we go from here? Would you consider undelete to allow me to argue the case? Or do I need to re-create?

Regards,

Springnuts 15:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you had endorsed the prod on the article. Rather than delete outright I've turned it into a redirect to List of Barney & Friends episodes and videos. If you think that a delete would be better let me know and I will remove it totally. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]