Welcome!

Hello, Sargdub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of financial regulatory authorities by country. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! cab (talk) 07:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sargdub

Sorry did not viewed your message before, thanks for helping with this edit, I agree the article needs formatting and verification but regarding the intro I think is totally incorrect to establish unverified facts and bogus affirmations for any article is wrong specially here, that could be posted below on the article but not on the main heading, I think the main heading should only represent facts and verifiable information.

also the fringe content seems totally unsupported I think this should be revised in the meantime.

thanks for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.253.76.169 (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sargdub,

I work on behalf of Travelex Group. We have created a wikipedia entry for the company which is both sufficiently informative and fair. A lot of hard work has gone into this, so we would appreciate it if you were at least able to explain your objections and at best stop changing it.

Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twjmurray (talk • contribs) 13:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sargdub.

I fixed FIMA to FINMA --> link. I guess it was an error or did you mean something different? Please write back here on this site. Thanks. --KurtR (talk) 04:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC) Yes it was meant to say FINMA, thanks for the fix Sargdub (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. --KurtR (talk) 20:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing nice work, adding those infoboxes. Kudos! Keep it up!--Epeefleche (talk) 06:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sargdub (talk) 06:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I thought I'd drop you a note to explain why I'm removing the flag icon from the FDIC page. I'm taking my cue from the Manual of Style, which admonishes against adding flags merely for decorative purposes, here, and as best I can tell that is the only reason to be adding it to the FDIC infobox. In addition, per the MOS, WP:MOSFLAG, flag icons shouldn't be used without accompanying text identifying the particular nation - which in this case would just add another layer of redundancy. As a general rule I think flag icons are to be used sparingly; I'm not sure if you're adding flag icons to other, similar articles but don't be surprised if other editors start removing them as well! Cheers - JohnInDC (talk) 13:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noted Sargdub (talk) 22:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the moves; I can't believe I managed to forget that, especially as I went on to move a number of similarly-named agencies in pursuance of the same naming convention! Must be getting old. Thanks again! ninety:one (reply on my talk) 14:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up at cheque; I didn't notice that it was two separate IPs, which mucked up the rollback. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat_spy 21:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sargdub. You have new messages at Talk:Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency.
Message added 21:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Sargdub,

I noticed people keep changing Currencies Direct, I am reverting to how it was for the following reasons:

Ignacio Hernandez is not a member of Currencies Direct, he was and is no longer

Peter Ellis does not legally want to be mentioned as a co-founder of Currencies Direct

So please take these two people of the page or more so revert to previous format.

thanks

Karl

Hi Sargdub,

I have emailed you in the past via Wikipedia regarding the information you have on Moneycorp and unfortunately received no response. The Moneycorp page has been updated to include new content and information produced by Moneycorp.

Please retain this listing as it is, the previous information was incorrect and dated, this has now been updated.

Kind regards Bilal Digital Marketing Moneycorp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bedell r (talk • contribs) 15:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at User talk:Bedell r Sargdub (talk) 05:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sargdub. Nice work on CySEC wiki! Been collecting info for writing about CySEC for some time now and I was excited to see the wiki published today. The information is spot on. I see you are very experienced with the financial services industry and I would appreciate it if you could give a few pointers for the TFIFX wiki. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/TFI_Markets_-_TFIFX#History —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelpillos (talk • contribs) 10:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Hi There
	Hi There, just wanted to check are you working with Wiki, if yes would require help in regards to how to go about in changing/updating the profile on wiki Y Sudhir Kumar Shetty (talk) 11:22, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Sargdub. I appreciated your following up my proposal on the Speculation article last week. I have one further question about it, so I thought I'd just let you know I'd left another note for you (here). I realize you've been off-wiki the last few days, and there's no great rush, but if you can take a look when you've got a moment, I'd be grateful. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 19:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw the update and your comment, many thanks! WWB Too (Talk · COI) 22:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just got around to posting another suggestion on the same article; the Investment vs. speculation section is pretty far off-base, so I've got some fixes in mind. Would be cool if you can review it. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 22:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I've actually got a third and final request—a little more straightforward, seeking to replace an entirely unsourced paragraph with a properly cited and, I think, more useful one. No big hurry on my part, anytime you have available soon will be fine. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 22:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, many thanks for helping me fix those issues with the article. If I can be of assistance in the future, just let me know. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 12:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Sargdub. Since you were so helpful regarding my suggestions for the Speculation article recently, and given your continued involvement with banking-related articles, I wonder if you would be willing to assist with a similar request for the Shadow banking system article? In mid-late September, I posted three suggestions for improving the lead section. Alas, no reply has come, and I've had no comment despite soliciting assitance at WP:FINANCE. Would you have the time to look at these and offer comment, perhaps implementing them if you agree? Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 22:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that somebody has already actioned part of the changes, and I agree with him re lead. I have however actioned the changes you suggested to entities section as requested. Sargdub (talk) 03:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if you agree with FeydHuxtable about omitting the other part of my lead request, then I'm inclined to leave that request alone. Thanks very much, though, for acting on the more recent one. If you happen to have the time and / or interest, another proposal I've made that has received some basic support, but could use another set of eyes, is on Talk:Short (finance), where I suggest re-organizing a few of the sections for clarity and to add sources. I would appreciate it greatly if so, but no worries if you are busy. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 13:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Sargdub. Thanks for following up my suggested edits on the Shadow banking system article last month. I posted a similar request on the same page not long after (see here) however I've been unable to find anyone else to review and (if an improvement) move it. Would you be willing to review this for me? Thanks, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again again, someone made this change for me last week, although I have one more small request: snipping out an unsupported sentence I believe to be incorrect. If you might have a chance to do that, my suggestions for this article will be complete. If you're busy elsewhere, no worries. Thanks, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd meant to follow up yesterday: someone else took care of this, actually, so, never mind! WWB Too (Talk · COI) 18:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi sargdub,

i have been doing some research on the remittance world and came across this company from uae called UAE Exchange and have taken this company in my project, according to the gulf news i read uae exchange have over 650 branches all over so i made the change but was reverted back by you also in this companies blog (http://uaeexchangeblog.com/) it is mentioned same, can you tell me why you did this, because if i was wrong i would have to change that in my project report, please respond.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erlosung (talk • contribs) 09:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have uploaded this profile of the company with nothing but the facts and history of the growth of company, but you have removed it, stating it is in a promotional way, which it surely is not, it is simple history and progress of the company that currently stands at . Kindly give a proper explanation and also if you could exactly point out at what points you felt the edits done by me were promotional way rather than simply removing it completely. For the time being i have reverted the page back to the edits that i had made. Appreciate your feedback. Hope you too as a wikipedian appreciate the time & effort put forth by me in researching on the facts and figures that i mentioned in the UAE Exchange page on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincent1988a (talk • contribs) 08:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Again you have reverted back to the older version of UAE Exchange without any kind of explanation to my question, i have give my explanation to you here in, but you have reverted stating that no explanation given, i will revert back to the version that was edited by me and give the same explanation there itself. Vincent1988a (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replay on your user talk page at User talk:Vincent1988a#UAE Exchange, Sargdub (talk) 23:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why have you reverted the edits that i had made on uae exchange, it does not make sense in no manner it is of promotional talk, kindly give a sensible reason behind doing so. Also you have removed the reference that i had given to a few words in the topic. Hope to get a response from you.Erlosung (talk) 10:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

also to add on this, the company also deals with bill payments, which again you have removed stating promotional talk, it is not a promotional talk it is what the company does, dont just keep removing the entries from other participants assuming it is of promotional talk, do the research and make changes accordingly, atleast go through uae exchanges website: www.uaeexchange.com and see what are the services they provide.

Secondly, the "Key Company Developments" category that i added here had just stated the developement of the company such as which yr which of they product was launched, how can that we termed as promotional, i have never mentioned or stated that it is the best company or largest company or any other term that can be said to be of promotional value. Even if a few words are of promotional value you can remove them and not completely delete the edits that has been done. The edits carried out by me have been with lot of research and effort, for every revert you do the only statement you make is promotional talk, so i really look forward to your reply on this matter. Thanks Erlosung (talk) 10:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, How are you doing, i am writing to you regarding a recent edit you've made on UAE Exchange, calling the section unnecessary, im not sure why has that been mentioned, while i have compared it with western union and they have similar thing mentioned and in more elaborated manner under the "Specific Services" but it has not been removed or changed, i have been trying to update the uae exchange profile but you have been removing any edit i make, is there any possibility that you can share your direct contact so we can discuss it one on one and understand your point. I have reverted back to the older version, as i feel it is needed for readers to understand more about the company and it will help users also understand the different types of money transfers. This has been done in good faith and to help wiki readers. IM ahmedi (talk) 13:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm writing to relatively recent contributors, including on the talk page, and asking if they want to help out. I still think there's a fair amount of work with this whole money laundering aspect, not that we've made mistakes, but rather in terms of making a good article better. For example, I think officials of the U.S. Justice Department have directly said they did not want to punish HSBC harder and risk the bank losing its license---because of risk of major economic disruption.

If you have time, please, jump in and help. We can probably very much use your help. Thanks. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 21:36, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Your recent edit to ASR removed the link to Aquifer storage and recovery. Was that intentional? I've just restored it, as it looked to me to be an accident.

—me_and 09:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No it was not intentional, it was an oversight when I changed the order, thanks for fixing it. Sargdub (talk) 06:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is an IP address who wants to talk about Citizens Republic Bancorp in the present tense even though the corporate entity no longer exists. Please monitor the article. Thank you. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sargdub,

I work for UKForex and noticed last week that our Wikipedia page had been redirected to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozforex. The rationale behind this change was “turn into redirect as all part of one company and this subsidiary is not notable in its own right”.

Like most companies, we have a ‘parent’ company – in this case OzForex – however we have our own brand identity in the UK & Europe as UKForex. I find it a little unfair that you have come to the conclusion that our brand is not notable when we are one of the UK’s biggest deliverable foreign exchange providers. What’s more, our page was informative, relevant, fair and regularly updated.

We take a lot of pride in our business (including our brand-specific Wikipedia page) and would appreciate it if you could please change this back. If you need proof of our significance as a brand please let me know.

Thanks Kurt Coleman — Preceding unsigned comment added by KurtUKForex (talk • contribs) 17:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sargdub,

Have you had a chance to consider this? It would be great to get a response from you so we can sort this out.

Thank you Kurt Coleman — Preceding unsigned comment added by KurtUKForex (talk • contribs) 17:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to this message on the talk page Talk:UKForex Sargdub (talk) 03:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

“UserNameUnderConstruction” either works for AdvisorShares or is pretending to. They are inserting obvious advertorial content into the Advisorshares entry in violation of Wikipeida’s rules. Here is the most blatant example: AdvisorShares believes that by accessing the AdvisorShares ETF platform, investment managers will be able to establish their own branded. They are also trying to cover up inconvenient facts that are backed by hard numbers from reliable sources about their ETFs being the most expensive active ETFs. These edits need to be reversed and this user should be warned and this user potentially needs to blocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etfcanadian (talk • contribs) 18:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ... quick question re a change you made in a lede. Does the phrase Investment Securities‎ only have a meaning within the US's use, in the UCC? If it is only used in that sense, I think it would be wise to revert the sense of the lede to how it read. If, however, it is used generally in a sense that the article covers which is divorced from that, and the statute just added a US-specific gloss to the phrase then the change makes sense. tx --Epeefleche (talk) 21:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its an interesting point, other definitions of this term I found are generic and not US specific and I have come across this in the context of banking where securities are held as an investment rather than resale, although it is not a common term and it may be that the US legal definition is the main one. I do feel the article is not very encyclopedic as it stands but have no objection to reverting it if you feel that it is primarily a US legal term.Sargdub (talk) 22:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have RS support I would leave your change as is. But many such terms are US-law-specific in origin (cf. "qualified institutional buyer" and "sophisticated investor"); my first instinct is this may be one of them. --Epeefleche (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sargdub,

Thank you for your feedback.

I'm an employee of Alpari UK, and was merely updating our company facts, due to much of this Wiki page being drastically outdated. Please could you point to where exactly the content was too promotional? We need to update this page, as currently the information is misleading and incorrect.

Thanks A ward87A ward87 (talk) 08:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sargdub,

Thank you again for your feedback.

I will leave the amends on the Alpari Group talk page for someone to amend. This is needed, as the current information is incorrect and very wrong.

The amendments made have been signed off by our Compliance department, who are aware of conflict of interests, and therefore ensured the tone is in keeping with what is already on the Alpari Group page, but with the new, and correct, information.

Thanks A ward87A ward87 (talk) 11:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:55, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Just as a heads-up, I'd like to mention that I'm writing a draft of the Interactive Brokers article as a paid editor for them. You can find the drafts here and here. Feel free to edit the page more, although I corrected most of the basic mistakes in the drafts, ones that I'll probably have on the mainspace soon. Thanks.--ɱ (talk) 23:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cactus (interbank network). Since you had some involvement with the Cactus (interbank network) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar of Good Humor

Hello Sargdub, Thank you very much for moderating TeleTrade entry. Please feel free to review it again, as we included notability reference and citation at our best posibiites. We can abslolutely back up with info the "citation needed" point but that it is impossible to make 200 links to each office separately, as they exist in the address book of a company, which is public (teletrade-dj.com);we can give examples and contact details of every office (valid address, operational phone number). I trully hope that most recent edit complies to referencing re notability of the topic. Sasha Cazar (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You worked on Dematerialization (securities), and Dematerialization (economics). In each case, a bot identified copyright issue concerns. It seems plausible that the sources copied from Wikipedia, however, the articles you started appear to start in September 2014, after the the sources were written. I think the answer is that you copied language from earlier versions of Dematerialization, before it was turned into a dab page. This is acceptable, but proper attribution to the original authors must be given. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for help on how to do this.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi S Philbrick, thanks, yes the original content came from the Dematerialization page which I have turned into disambiguation page. I had a look at the text identified by the bot and it seems most likely that it was copied from the original page on Wikipedia and not the other way round. But appreciate the attribution point and have made sure that all Dematerialization talk pages have a split tag on them and a comment. Sargdub (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I realize when I am doing copyright issue reviews that I haven't always paid close attention to the talk pages. I will immediately modify my procedures to do so in order to check for split templates or other explanations. That said, I just reviewed the directions and while it suggests including a note on the talk page it suggests so as a supplement. The instructions indicate that it is required to include a notation as an edit summary in the article itself. I have done so in this case. I am bringing this to your attention for future use, sorry for the bureaucracy but it does help keep track of things. As an aside, I think the state of economics articles in Wikipedia is subpar so I am happy to see someone improving them.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I understand now what you mean now, I will make sure I clearly attribute in the edit summary going forward and thanks for doing it on these pages. Sargdub (talk) 20:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sargdub

Thank you for your review of my edits to Pepperstone. I'd like to request that you further review citations 10 and 11 in the History section which I had removed. The text relates to 'Media coverage in the Australian Financial Review' however the citations are unrelated -as such I request that you undo your changes to this edit. I also request that you undo your changes to my edit of the link to MetaQuotes Software wikipedia page in the Services and Operation section. This is now again incorrectly linked to the text '5' rather than the text 'metatrader'. Forexnews (talk) 04:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Forexnews, I did a quick review and not sure I understand your comments as it looks okay to me, I had a look at the citations, 9, 10 and 11 and I think they do provide a reference for the statement made in the history section. Citations 9 covers the ASIC action while 10 covers the fact that Paperstone is was trading in Japan and did so without the correct license. Citation 11 just covers that Pepperstone was trading in Japan and so could be removed but is a reasonable source for indicating that trading in Japan was occurring. On the link to Metatrader, there is a link in lead section already it does not have to be linked again and linking from a number such as 5 I feel is confusing and better to spell out the whole name again if a link was warranted. Sargdub (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hey Sargdub, i am an IG Group employee and need to make significant factual updates to our wikipedia page. The first one has been rejected and so was wondering how best we can go about this?

Please advise....

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by IGwikiedit (talk • contribs) 10:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IGwikiedit, I appreciate you declaring your position and see you are keen to update the IG Group article, however as an employee there is a potential conflict of interest WP:COI and and Wikipedia guidelines strongly discourage the editing of pages about your own company because of this reason. It would be difficulty for you to present a neutral point of view, see WP:NPOV. If there are factual information you would like to update, the best way to make sure it does not get undone, is to make the suggestion on the talk page Talk:IG Group, declare your conflict of interest and let another editors apply the changes. I appreciate you are keen to make changes and you are free to do so, but I suggest you read the two guidelines which should help you understand the Wikipedia guidelines and how to make good edits. Sargdub (talk) 22:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hey Sargdub, thanks for the information and for getting back to me. Yes i understand the conflict issue so have kept the edits strictly factual. Please take a look...

IGwikiedit (talk — Preceding undated comment added 11:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted your changes to FXOpen article due to its falsehood. FXOpen is not Russia-based broker. If you have any proof - please, cite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watcher FX (talk • contribs) 14:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Moneycorp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not established. The references are mainly from the org itself, and those theatre not add no value to verification of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 21:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a small something to a friend down under! (CySEC) Building The future through History 22:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Sargdub,

I work for GAIN Capital, and so to avoid potential conflicts of interest and ensure a neutral point of view, I took your advice and posted suggested updates to the GAIN Capital talk page, instead of editing the GAIN Capital article myself. Since you have made edits to this article in the past, I would appreciate if you would review these proposed edits.

Thanks GAIN Capital (talk) 21:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sargdub, I see that you have re-rated the "Priority Sector Lending Certificates" article as Start Class under the AfC. As a main contributor to this article I would like to work on improving this article. (It was rated as B Class when accepted under AfC last year.) I understand that you take interest in financial markets and trading. Would there be a wikipedia article on any other financial instrument that I could look at for improving this one? Please advise. Regards, amgodbole P.S.: Just in case the re-rating from B-Class to Start Class was unintentional can you please revert it back to B-Class AfC article? Please advise. Amgodbole (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amgodbole, I appreciate the effort and the article has good referencing and has some positive attributes, however to get to B-Class takes a lot of work. You can see Wikipedia:WikiProject assessment/B-Class criteria for details. I feel it will need more details such as a history section and deeper explanation, improve lead so that people who don't know about the subject can understand it better, which can be hard when you are close to the subject. I think it is close to C-Class but is still a start class. Normally the article needs to have been around a while and have a few different editors, this is still a relatively new article and very few editors have been involved. I see that the previous rating was done by a Bot and so not a good assessment. See if you can get other editors from other B-Class articles involved which will help such as say Banknote is a good example as a finance article. Sargdub (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sargdub, Thanks for your reply. The AfC rating was done manually (while others were done by bots). There is a chronological list of events associated with this new financial instrument. It's currently under a section titled as "Background". Perhaps, that could be renamed as History (there isn't much other than these events---that's available in public domain--- as this is essentially a new type of financial instrument that's peculiar to India. Yes, this article can seem somewhat cryptic to those not familiar with financial derivatives or carbon credits and perhaps some involvement of other editors could help. Thanks for sharing Banknote article. Regards,Amgodbole (talk) 09:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sargdub. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, PAX Technology, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Winged Blades ^Godric 14:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sargdub, First of all I'd like to thank you for your Keep vote in the AfD discussion of the FxPro page. However, it was deleted. I'm the FxPro employee and I believe that FxPro deserves an article on Wikipedia. And I'd like to ask you for advice - what is best way to get the article back, so that it has no COI and is 100% compliant with Wikipedia rules? The Admin who has deleted it suggested the following: appeal or recreation. However, in case I recreate it - it will be considered as COI. So, I'd really appreciate your opinion on this topic. Kind regards, Mcmikhedoff (talk) 08:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sargdub, did you have a chance to have a look on my questions? Mcmikhedoff (talk) 14:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mcmikedoff, unfortunately the current consensus is that it does not meet notability, I feel that its a close call. The COI editing was a problem and that seems to have swayed a few voters, unfortunately as you say your COI means that it's hard to be impartial see WP:COI. I think the company has some notability, and given time somebody will probably recreate it, particulary if there are more mentions of the the company from third party reputable sources. At the moment my only advice is to leave it. Sargdub (talk) 05:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your revert. There is no other “all the countries.”

“A cheque (British and Canadian English) or check (American English)” gives the complete picture, while the shortened version does not, and could mislead.

Every English regional dialect stems from one of the main branches, British and (North) American. Furthermore “American English” has historically been considered to include Canadian, so it could fool some readers, or at least confuse, to leave out the only exception, Canadian English.

Cheers,  —Michael Z. 2017-07-06 18:20 z

I agree there can be confusion between American and Canadian English and your edit is not wrong. However, the problem for the article is if we go this route, we can also add Australian English, New Zealand English, South African English, Indian English etc... (List of dialects of the English languages) this started happening on a old version of this article a year or two ago. It just means the opening sentence became longer and longer. Also then who are we to deny somebody from say Antigue to add their own variant of Antiguan English and it just gets out of control. Instead I have now removed British altogether and just highlight American English as that seems the be the only english variant that spells it Check. Hope this makes my rational clear as I normally am reluctant to make changes to english variants as I know it can become contentious and I don't disagree with your rational but just trying to keep the article manageable. Cheers, Sargdub (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Im currently rebuilding the WikiProject Investment.

I already am pretty much finished with updating the project page.Take a look at it. Ping me if you want to help! Thanks. WikiEditCrunch (talk) 21:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Hi Sargdub, thanks for helping to edit the LMAX Exchange article. The company is however not a financial aggregator, it is a Multilateral Trading Facility (MTF) for FX trading, so I will change this information back. I will also add more information about 'last look' in FX and this company's involvement, please feel free to review. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by RTe-wiki (talk • contribs) 16:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EBA Clearing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBA Clearing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on PAX Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sargdub, since you made some updates to the Jim Goetz article a few days back, I'm wondering if you had reviewed or considered my proposed expansion of the article, currently on the talk page. Because I have a financial COI here, I believe it's best I not edit the article directly. However, I've been struggling to find someone to give it a closer look over the past three weeks. Would you have the time or interest? I'll keep my fingers crossed, and let me know if you can. Best, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 16:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, this has been taken care of. Best, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 22:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing the page. The company does not operate like a pawn broker, it operates like a secure lender that uses collateral to determine the value of the loan. I ask you kindly to please stop editing the page and focus on another topic.

Please note that everybody is free to edit pages on Wikipedia which is a key tenet of the Wikipedia. Even your own explanation is exactly what a pawnbroker does. I see you keep removing the pawnbroker term from the article Borro. Having looked at the definition of Pawnbroker this is exactly what the company does, it makes loans based on taking goods as collateral. I suspect that the company does not want to use the term in its marketing because of its image but that does not change the what it does. If you have a good reason that pawnbroker is not suitable description please discuss it on the article talk page and try and get some consensus from other editors. Saying stop editing the page is not a good reason. I am not sure if you are in anyway associated with the company but if you are please also see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before making any edits. Sargdub (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

November 26, 2018: Hi Sargdub, I apologize for maybe handling this a bit inappropriately. When you say that my explanation is exactly what a pawnbroker does, I'd argue that it's exactly what an Asset Based Lender does. Taken from wikipedia: "Asset-based lending is any kind of lending secured by an asset. This means, if the loan is not repaid, the asset is taken." A 'Collateral Based Lender' also applies here. Taken from wikipedia"In lending agreements, collateral is a borrower's pledge of specific property to a lender, to secure repayment of a loan.[1][2] The collateral serves as a lender's protection against a borrower's default and so can be used to offset the loan if the borrower fails to pay the principal and interest satisfactorily under the terms of the lending agreement." I'd say that these two descriptions are even more pertinent than the Pawnbroker one. Thanks, looking forward to your reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedichee (talk • contribs) 16:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cornering the market into Market manipulation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I don't normally copy content from other pages, but in this instance I wanted a summary of the topic to add to market market manipulation page. I will make sure to attribute in future and have added the attribution to the talk page. Also thanks for fixing the ACH Network page history. Sargdub (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sargdub,

Thanks for creating List of Asian stock exchanges! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The name in the citation clearly read "IRFIS - Mediocredito della Sicilia S.p.a.", o in breve "IRFIS S.p.a.", Please don't altered the content to hoax. Matthew hk (talk) 10:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also it is not owned by UniCredit. https://palermo.repubblica.it/dettaglio-news/18:32/4095407 https://www.unicreditgroup.eu/it/press-media/press-releases/2012/PressRelease1796.html Please do not add outdate info to infobox and provide citation for historial info in the main text. Matthew hk (talk) 10:57, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Financial services of the Netherlands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MetaQuotes Software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetaQuotes Software until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Khinkali (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MetaQuotes Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-uaexchange.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Euroclear logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cnmv-es-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cmb-logo-tr.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IC Markets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IC Markets (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lesliechin1 (talk) 07:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Synchrony Financial page

Sargdub - I am reaching out on behalf of my client Synchrony Financial. We would like your help updating the company page with 2021 information. For example, the financials, the CEO, and other data listed is all of out date. I am happy to provide links to public sources, but as a publicly traded company we would appreciate help getting it updated.

24.189.78.79 (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment April 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the April newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our first regular newsletter and has plenty of exciting announcements. You have received this because you added yourself as a participant to the project, but will only receive future newsletters if you sign up for the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to do so. April Drive: The month-long April Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! New layout: The layout of the WikiProject has been greatly improved, with a navigation bar being added to the top of every page and separate pages for assessment and edit requests, templates, resources, and news. Come take a look! Signing up for the newsletter: To sign up for future newsletters about upcoming drives, recent promotions, and other miscellaneous topics, add yourself to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Mailing list. You will then receive them in your talk page regularly. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 22:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fsa-jp-logo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Fsa-jp-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment May 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the May newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our second regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. April Drive finished: The month-long April Content-creation Drive has now concluded. Our first content drive was a great start for what will be a regular feature of our Wikiproject. We will be doing them every other month, so there's none for May, but I look forward to seeing you sign up for the June edition. The drive's target was to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards were given to those who participated. June Drive topic for discussion: We're currently brainstorming topics for our June Content-creation Drive. Join the discussion here. Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Real Estate Bank of Arkansas was created and nominated by Hog Farm and Ranchlander National Bank was created and nominated by Sammi Brie. They're currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to them! UBS has been nominated for a Good article reassessment. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the June newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our third regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. June Drive: The month-long June Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of stock exchanges. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Google Wallet was created and nominated by InfiniteNexus and George D. Gould was created and nominated by Ktin. Ktin is currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to him! UBS's Good Article Reassessment is still ongoing. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Cheque was selected as an Article for improvement on May 16 for one week. You can see the improvement during that period here. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 07:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chartered Financial Divorce Specialist (CFDS)

There are 2 errors you've added in the form of edits to be corrected

1. accountants is incorrect

"Chartered Financial Divorce Specialist (CFDS) is a Canadian professional designation that can be earned by individuals who are accountants" is incorrect.  The article clearly states "recognized financial or accounting designation" and goes on to list several as follows: "CFP, R.F.P., PFP, CLU, CHFC, CA, CMA, CIA, CGA, CSWP"  While there are some accountants who achieve a CFDS designation, the majority are Chartered Financial Planners.  

2. proponents is incorrect

"Proponents of divorce specialists say that adding financial expertise can simplify unrealistic expectations on the part of a separating couple" is incorrect.  The calculation validates the potential outcomes, regardless of who states the fact.  Being a proponent is not a factor in calculations.

Your edits were valuable in pointing out the gaps in understanding around this and point to areas clarifying details will be added, even though they exist further down in the article. I will correct and further specify in the correction.

If you are unsure in the future please feel free to reach out and ask. Thank you for your contribution. Victor (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for feedback

Hi! I noticed that you contributed to this article in the past (thank you!), and I recently contributed significantly to the banking lobby article. As a new user, I would really appreciate some feedback! Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peanutbutterisbad (talk • contribs) 22:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Payzone (United Kingdom) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Payzone (United Kingdom), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was a split article using content that has been on Wikipedia for a number of years, although I agree the references are not ideal, a better approach would have been to tag the article or mark it for deletion if you feel it is not notable. A move to draft space is not useful as it now leaves the original split disam article with redlinks and missing content. 22:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Sargdub (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Payzone (Ireland) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Payzone (Ireland), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was a split article using content that has been on Wikipedia for a number of years, although I agree the references are not ideal, a better approach would have been to tag the article or mark it for deletion if you feel it is not notable. A move to draft space is not useful as it now leaves the original split disam article with redlinks and missing content.Sargdub (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Payzone (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Payzone (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Oliver Rieger

Hi @Sargdub: When you've an infobox entry on an European person, you don't use "alma mater" for the subjects education. Nobody in Europe knows what that is. That is what the education field is for. Also when you post an infobox it needs to be full as possible, not just a couple of entry. It needs to be as detailed as possible. That is conensus. scope_creep^Talk 07:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Your edit to Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment (Nigeria) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Payzone (United Kingdom)

Hello, Sargdub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Payzone (United Kingdom), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Payzone (Ireland)

Hello, Sargdub. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Payzone (Ireland), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eftpos-nz-logo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Eftpos-nz-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Credit unions of the Philippines

A tag has been placed on Category:Credit unions of the Philippines indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Afm-nl-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Afm-nl-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Electronic Money Institution has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Electronic Money Institution. Thanks! SeoR (talk) 02:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electronic Money Institution has been accepted

Electronic Money Institution, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fermiboson (talk) 12:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is undoubtedly notable, which is why I published it. It does, however, as the last reviewer noted, need some work. I'm not familiar with the topic area, so I unfortunately can't give much concrete advice on what exactly is required. Generally, the article seems to rely on primary sources, which isn't very desirable. Fermiboson (talk) 12:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo Global Management

Hi Sargdub, I see that you are a member of WP:Finance, so I think you're an appropriate editor to look at the edit request I've posted here, for Apollo Global Management. I provided clarification after a different editor asked a question about this request, but that editor has not responded in over a month. I hope you'll consider implementing the edit. Thanks, Chamanch123 (talk) 12:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sargdub, I really appreciate your work on this. I have just posted an edit request on Apollo Global Management co-founder and CEO Marc Rowan's Talk page at Talk: Marc Rowan #Updates to the article. I would love it if you'd take a look. Thank you, Chamanch123 (talk) 15:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, Sargdub, you have been so helpful on Marc Rowan's page. I have posted one more edit request on the page for now, at Talk:Marc Rowan# Update to board activity and removal of "private equity". Please take a look if you're interested. Have a wonderful day, Chamanch123 (talk) 12:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LCCHR request

Hello! A few months ago, you assisted me at Talk:Atlantic Union Bank by reviewing and implementing a replacement draft I shared on the bank's behalf. Earlier this month, I submitted a replacement draft at Talk:Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights on the organization's behalf, but I've struggled to get any editor feedback despite seeking help at three relevant WikiProjects. I've clearly disclosed my conflict of interest, and explained how the current entry is problematic (as evidenced by multiple warning banners). You seem particularly interested in finance and investment, but I was wondering if you might be willing to review the draft for this organization. Either way, thanks again for your previous assistance! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look. Much appreciated! Inkian Jason (talk) 14:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richard M. Schulze request

Hi again, Sargdub! First, thanks again for your assistance on LCCHR based on my request above. Given your interest in finance and investment, and willingness to review COI requests, I am curious if you might be able to take a look at my request to update the Richard M. Schulze entry here. I've disclosed my COI and proposed specific replacement text for the Philanthropy section, which is incomplete and poorly sourced. I try not to rely on the same volunteers for help, but there seems to be a backlog at the COI edit request queue, since I have not received any feedback since February. Either way, thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, Inkian Jason (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth C. Griffin edit request

Hi Sargdub. Happy to meet you. I noticed that you are a member of WP:Finance and was hoping you wouldn't mind taking a look at a recent edit request I posted at Talk:Kenneth C. Griffin#Political views, re-written. I would appreciate your input, and if possible, if you could implement the request as you feel is appropriate. Thanks so much, Cduffymul (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Westpac NZ article development

hi Sargdub, thank you for creating the new Westpac article. I created User:Duncnbiscuit/Westpac New Zealand to capture ideas and references. Feel free to make use of it.Duncnbiscuit (talk) 06:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Moneycorp for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moneycorp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moneycorp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bosecovey (talk) 20:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Street Capital Management

Hi Sargdub, I'm working to expand the King Street Capital Management page. Since you are a member of WikiProject Finance & Investment and express interest in the industry, I thought you may consider reviewing my edit request. I'd greatly appreciate assistance with implementing the edits and I look forward to hearing your feedback. Thank you, Max at King Street (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Max, I have reviewed and completed the changes suggested, see article talk page.Sargdub (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wayne Bank (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wayne Bank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Baqi:) (talk) 14:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sargdub! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Baqi:) (talk) 14:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citadel Securities Partnerships Edit Request

Hi Sargdub. I noticed that you are a member of WP:Finance & Investment, so perhaps you would not mind taking a look at an edit request I recently posted at Talk:Citadel Securities#Add to Partnerships and History which is concerned with new partnerships between Citadel Securities and a few financial exchanges in the US. Thanks, Cduffymul (talk) 16:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission Iran Zamin Bank at Articles for creation has been accepted

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Swimear (talk) 20:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khan Bank (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Avgeekamfot was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khan Bank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Avgeekamfot (talk) 02:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khan Bank has been accepted

Khan Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sargdub (talk) 02:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]