The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard work, especially on the John de Lancie article. Quis separabit? 04:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jennifer Gunter, Robincantin!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've tagged the Talk page for WP:BLP, and a check of references currently suggests this article conforms very well to Wikipedia requirements for living people. You could do with adding more categories linking to women's health issues - perhaps one of the sub-cats under Category:Reproductive rights, or equivalent, might help. You could also consider looking under Category:Alternative medicine, though I couldn't find one best suited to debunkers of alternative medicine. (not my field of knowledge, I'm afraid)

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 14:37, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome- keep up the good work! Nick Moyes (talk) 21:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some of the advocacy, both here and in the article on Timothy Caulfield. WP articles provides accurate information on health issues, emphasising the scientific perspective, but they do not advocate for them. A plain factual presentation without highlighted quotes or repetition best gives the readers the information. DGG ( talk ) 10:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DGG, I think those are helpful changes. These were pretty much the first pages I wrote, the style was a little off. Are you comfortable removing the "news release" tag from the Caulfield article at this point? Robincantin (talk) 15:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is still a lot of promotionalism there. One of the ways I define promotionalism is that promotional writing is what the subject would like readers to know about himself, in contrast to encyclopedic writing, which is what a general reader might want to know. A key example in the current text is anecdotes. They're good anecdotes, and express views that we both probably wholeheartedly agree with. You're obviously a trained writer, and use them effectively, better than I could, and the entire article with them included would be perfect--for some other place.

I find it harder to write objectively about things I like, than those I do not; I therefore prefer to deal with things of importance, in fields where I know something but which I do not greatly care about specifically, or to make the sort of copyedits that would improve any article. DGG ( talk ) 22:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You say snapping of the fingers??? This is very inaccurate. The practitioner places his hand on a specific area of the body and proceeds to apply a corrective momentum as to stimulate the receptors of the skin. This in return causes a cascade of events which ultimately changes the behaviour of the body’s proteins. This mechanisms viability is often proven during Bruce Lipton’s lectures eg. Biology of belief. Nowhere on the informational website does it mention snapping of the fingers. I am a patient and I thought that this needed to be addressed. Otherwise, good work. Thank you. Factualistmaxim (talk) 13:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Factualistmaxim! Thanks for the message. I was surprised by the finger-snapping, but it does come up in the conversation between the CBC reporter and the show host in the audio news report I used as one of the sources. Perhaps different practitioners use different techniques. I can only go with what reliable secondary sources (i.e. not the commercial website of the founders) tell us. I hope it will be possible to refine the article as more sources become available. Robincantin (talk) 22:46, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robincantin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great improvements on 'barn fires' (article moved since)! I just reviewed the article and saw that you had an almost equal hand with the page creator in making the article what it is now, so, thank you for that and keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 10:25, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating the Momo Challenge page, it's very interesting and gives me something to look at obsessively throughout the day. puggo 22:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Robincantin! You created a thread called Error generated by Template:Designation within the Cemetery infobox? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Info-Cult.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

please see WP:MOS for guidelines on how to edit the tone and language to be more encyclopedic

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 16:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,907		Andrew Wakefield (talk)	Add sources
243		Vertebral subluxation (talk)	Add sources
274		Dosha (talk)	Add sources
99		Robert Sears (physician) (talk)	Add sources
252		Autism Speaks (talk)	Add sources
12		Sri Vani Vidyashala High School (talk)	Add sources
255		Pressure point (talk)	Cleanup
19		Outline of autism (talk)	Cleanup
97		Evin Prison (talk)	Cleanup
48		Autistic enterocolitis (talk)	Expand
53		Cape Wind (talk)	Expand
1,308		Hybrid vehicle (talk)	Expand
138		Preternatural (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
358		Lock picking (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
306		Fluoride toxicity (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
45		Mind–body interventions (talk)	Merge
18		Live vector vaccine (talk)	Merge
10		PLAY Project (talk)	Merge
3,466		Bollywood (talk)	Wikify
176		Guilt-Shame-Fear spectrum of cultures (talk)	Wikify
58		Credulity (talk)	Wikify
12		J. Bart Classen (talk)	Orphan
9		Biological terrain assessment (talk)	Orphan
4		Nancy Grimm (talk)	Orphan
20		Trace Amounts (talk)	Stub
4		Allan Hay (talk)	Stub
11		New England Wild Flower Society (talk)	Stub
9		Mother Warriors (talk)	Stub
196		How Are You? (TV series) (talk)	Stub
337		Banana Sprite challenge (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Vaccine Choice Canada.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

The provided coverage is borderline for establishing that the subject meets WP:ORGCRITE, but it looks likes there's more coverage online.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:39, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Indeed, there have been a few more news reports since I created the article. Just added four new citations and a bit of text. Thanks! Robincantin (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Del Bigtree.

User:Nick Moyes while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Seems to be a well-written and neutral article on a pretty controversial person. Well done.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 13:41, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Nick Moyes: for taking the time to review the article (so quickly!), I appreciate the work you do for the community. I'll try to update the page as more information becomes available on this person's work. Robincantin (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Informed Consent Action Network.

User:Nick Moyes while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

You shouldn't include any topic in 'see also' if you've already linked to it in the article - it's really only for closely related but non-mentioned topics. Your definition of vaccine hesitancy also appears to be a copy-paste from an external page. Please check if you've accidentally breached our copyvio rules, or if the text is licenced. I don't mean this to come across as terse as it reads - sorry.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 13:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Moyes:, thank you for the revision comments. Right on both counts. I removed one of the See also link and reworked the beginning of that paragraph. I took the bit of text from the Vaccine Hesitancy wikipedia page, not realizing that page reproduced part of the text on a WHO webpage. I should take a look at that article next. Robincantin (talk) 15:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for adding the Margery Starre links, I've been trying to do that myself but couldn't for the life of me see a way to do it without shoehorning. Cheers! ——SerialNumber54129 20:07, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: Glad to know I did it right. Cheers!

If you don't mind me saying, you're doing good work :) nice one. ——SerialNumber54129 20:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HI Robincantin, I am new to wikipedia and still learning, I have tried adding some additional sources to the article for artist Carrie Able that see that it is flagged for possible deletion after I did so, I was wondering if you have any suggestions for me or are able to help as I see that you previously edited this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahW2019 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SarahW2019: Hello SarahW2019! As Shalor explained on your Talk page, the article may not clearly establish the notability of this artist (why there should be a wikipedia article about her). Many articles considered for deletion can be saved (I've done it a few times). I think you know what to do: find more mentions of her work in credible sources and add those to the article. A solid profile in a well-known art publication would really help, if it exists. I'll have a look today or tomorrow. Finally, if you know this person, you should probably walk away from the article and let disinterested editors handle it. Robincantin (talk) 13:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, i don't know personally but am a fan, particularly of her poetry. I did find a feature interview in Widewalls Art Magazine https://www.widewalls.ch/carrie-able-interview which is one of my favorites, and also link to her as speaker for the games for chance festival https://g4c19.sched.com/speaker/carrie_able.1znmctvp — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahW2019 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Routine, I've given one to the new editor (and 2 weeks ago to another on the talk page), and I've used DSAWARE to give them all to myself. Doug Weller talk 14:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Yes, I did understand the nature of the message, but thanks for taking the extra step of leaving the second note. I think I'm doing okay. I'm attentive to the feedback of other editors and careful with my use of sources. Robincantin (talk) 14:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Doug Weller talk 14:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've noticed you've been doing a lot of work in the orphan categories recently, which is great. Can I make a suggestion with regards to de-orphaning of Indian and Pakistani villages? There are quite a lot of them, and they're actually tremendously easy to de-orphan in groups if you're willing to do a bit of scut-work. It's a lot more productive than tagging them as "attempted" and walking away. The trick is creating a simple navbox for the district (like {{Sonbhadra district}}), filling it out from the appropriate "villages in X district" and "cities and towns in X district" categories, and slapping it on every village and town article in the district. With some you can get 10-15 de-orphaned at once, depending on how many villages are in the district. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ♠PMC♠ (talk)! That's a good idea, I might do that, it would be more satisfying than just tagging them as attempted. This being said, those are stubs with no notability. I do wonder if they belong on wikipedia at all. Do you know if there was a discussion at some point that determined those were useful? Robincantin (talk) 11:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, per the five pillars we're a gazetteer, among other things, so the notability guideline for geography says "populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low". Conceivably you could try to merge them all into the relevant district article, but my guess is it'd be a lot of pointless work and you'd get a hell of a lot of pushback eventually. And of course, what happens if they get redistricted, which happens from time to time? Even more annoying to fix than it already is. All together, not worth mucking about with, in my opinion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, thanks. Navbox it is then. I'll take some time to retrace my steps and integrate them. I think most of them are in Jaunpur. Robincantin (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, if you need any help with doing navboxes (or anything else really) let me know :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

♠PMC♠ (talk), I just added Birahadpur to the Jaunpur navbox to get the hang of it, maybe you can check my work before I do a bunch of them. Cheers. Robincantin (talk) 16:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so, {{Jaunpur district}} is one of the horribly-formatted existing ones I occasionally come across that needs to be reworked into something more like {{Sonbhadra district}}, where cities/towns and villages are separated in the navbox. It's nonsensical for a navbox to link to another bunch of navboxes, so that entire second section labelled "other districts" should be stripped out and replaced with the list of the district's villages, like I've done at the Sonbhadra navbox. I usually change the title to "Populated places in X district" as well.

You can cheat and make this process less tedious by going into Category:Villages in Jaunpur district, selecting all of them at one, and copy-pasting that into your sandbox in Visual Editor mode. This preserves the bullet point and the link markup so you don't have to individually type out * [[Some village]] a hundred times. Then remove the headers and disambiguators (also usually easier to do in VE). Finally, switch to the regular text editor and copy-paste the newly-formatted list into the navbox under "villages". Now you have all the villages neatly placed into the navbox all at once and you can simply go through the navbox systematically making sure each article is de-orphan-tagged and has the navbox in it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, getting it done :) Robincantin (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fantastic! I made a couple little tweaks but mostly just personal preference, lol. Looks like you got a massive pile of de-orphanings out of it, which, not sure about you, but I always find super satisfying. Ping me or drop me a line if you run into anything else :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devkali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chitrakoot.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just wanted to let you know I reverted your recent edit[1] on Young Living because it created a conflict with the data sources that were based on the 2016 IDS. In theory, an additional sentence could be added referring to the 2019 IDS data but since it's based on interpretation of a WP:PRIMARY source it's probably not advisable. Cheers! Rhode Island Red (talk) 15:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eh there, Rhode Island Red! I understand - the 2016 data is included because it had been filtered by the New Yorker. The difference between $1 and $3 per month isn't critical anyway... thank you for all the work you've put into that page.Robincantin (talk) 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That echoes my thinking about the data. Thanks for the nod! Rhode Island Red (talk) 17:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, Toddst1, I was not aware. Thank you. Makes de-orphaning a little more complicated, but I understand the reason for the change. Robincantin (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robincantin, I must say your accusations of others are harsh and unrelentless. Funny how those of you spewing words like "conspiracy theorist," "Fake News" etc. Are the very people listening to the darkest of news and believing it... sad how satan has control of you and the other leftists... We will see who wins.... God Bless America... TRUMP 2020... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queenbulldog (talk • contribs) 13:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Queenbulldog, if this is general criticism of the work I do on wikipedia, this is indeed the right place to post it; I moved it down (recent topics go at the bottom) and gave it a title.

If your ire was provoked by my work on a specific page, I invite you to use the Talk page associated with that article, so that other editors can debate the wickedness of my ways and my COI with satan. You could also propose other ways to write about whatever gets you riled up, as long as it's backed by reliable sources. Robincantin (talk) 15:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Queenbulldog: What you have said to Robin on her talk is not civil. I don't know what this stemmed from, but if you have an issue, like Robin said, take it to the article's talk page. Being a Donald Trump supporter has no bearing on the issue at hand. If this is how you respond to people on here, you will have no argument. Again, be neutral and civil. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of fictional towns in television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slovak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[2]

Hey, could you please provide a source? It would be great if you could do so. Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Firestar464, that statement was already sourced in the Medicinal claims and research section of the article (also just added a supporting source now), I merely added a sentence in the lead based on that. I didn't see the need to repeat the source in the lead. Robincantin (talk) 11:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robin, I'm his mentor. I wanted to let you know that I just told him about this. Thanks. Scorpions13256 (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good, Scorpions13256!

Not by me...just thought you'd want to know, since you've done such an awesome job documenting the anti-vaxx movement. Thanks for all you've added to those articles, you are a very valuable contributor to Wikipedia, keep up the great work!!! ---Avatar317^(talk) 01:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Avatar317, good to know - I'll be watching the page. Thank you for your kind words and really THANKS for watching many of those pages against vandalism and whitewashing. Robincantin (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/McDonald's 1984 Olympics promotion at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article McDonald's 1984 Olympics promotion, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the McDonald's promotion campaign for the 1984 Olympic Games was given an unexpected boost by the Cold War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/McDonald's 1984 Olympics promotion. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, McDonald's 1984 Olympics promotion), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Zach Bush, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Nomadicghumakkad (talk). I shall wait for more in-depth sources to surface. Robincantin (talk) 03:30, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robincantin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zach Bush, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Cowan (alternative medicine practitioner) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Cowan (alternative medicine practitioner) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PureRED | talk to me | 20:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PureRED: you submitted it for deletion after it was severely cut down by an anonymous user, changes that were later reversed (not by me). I suggest you take a second look at the text. I just added a bunch of sources a some text, actually. Robincantin (talk) 02:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [3] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still obsessively re-assessing that stubs list, Sgerbic, adding short descriptions as I go through it and tagging texts I want to go back to. Might be done with that task over the weekend. Robincantin (talk) 10:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terrific - I did a longish spot check last week and was able to remove many from the list that were no longer stubs. It's been neglected for so long, probably years that it will take a while to get it in order. Thanks for doing this Robin. It's hard to get started when there is a mess first. Sgerbic (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for: 2022 Earth Day Edit-a-thon 2pm - 4pm EST (April 22nd) online via Zoom and in person This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/

-- Environment of New York City Task Force - Wil540 art (talk) 21:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and thanks for taking up this article update.

• I had updated this to do list, I am keenly interested in Superstition and religion related article expansions, so requesting your visit to Draft:Irrational beliefs and Draft:Superstitions in Christian societies and help expand as per your interest and convenience.
• One difficulty while updating superstition related other articles is some users insistently ask to show word superstition in the source. That is why we need to have a comprehensive and stable definition @ main Superstition article lead so while updating other articles we would be able to say such and such component falls under definition of superstition.
• Following sources I had noted down in my sandbox for later update in the article Superstition see if those help your ongoing update in anyway.
  • Vyse, Stuart A.. Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition - Updated Edition. United Kingdom, OUP USA, 2013. Page 22.
  • Edis, Taner. Weirdness! What Fake Science and the Paranormal Tell Us about the Nature of Science. United States, Pitchstone Publishing.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 02:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Romana Didulo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romana Didulo. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robincantin, You reverted the edits (for notability tags) on Elliot Bogod. Are the existing references not enough to justify his notability? 103.19.141.1 (talk) 11:38, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not in my opinion, no. As I wrote on the Talk page (where this discussion should be taking place), what we have now is either various incarnations of his own bio, or tiny mentions in articles from low-quality sources. It's a common problem, nothing to fret about - but the article does need better sources. Just adding links to posts the topic wrote himself won't change that, nothing useful was added since another editor put the template up, so it should remain there.

If you're going to interact with other editors, I suggest you register an account and sign your posts. That will make conversations easier. Robincantin (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your advice. Cheers. 103.19.141.1 (talk) 12:29, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiffany Dover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Dover until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jaigris Hodson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Christopher Labos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a very nicely composed article and I'm sorry to decline it, however, the sources -- though exhaustive --appear to largely be articles written by Labos, interviews with Labos, ahd his official biography. I'm not seeing WP:SIGCOV *about* Labos.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Labos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 07:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robincantin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 07:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sayer Ji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayer Ji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jp×g🗯️ 22:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, jp×g🗯️. I hadn't updated this articles in about six months, made a few additions now, including some from a recent book on this type of influencers I happen to have. Still a little borderline for notability perhaps, it's interesting to follow and contribute to the AfD conversation. Cheers. Robincantin (talk) 14:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robincantin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christopher Labos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]