I've had my eye off the ball and have just seen an old message from you concerning sound field recording. I have an extensive library of wildlife sounds and have developed unconventional techniques which I share on a chat list with other Field Recordists. I can give detailed theory why low mic placements sometimes give better results, but my final arbiter is my own ears which are highly trained and still good at an advancing age from an extended bass of 5 Hz to 13 KHz. My standard mic rig is two MKH 416 mics in blimps at about 20 degrees into a pro quality SQN mixer (well into 3 £zeroes). Theoretically this shouldn't give a good centre image because of the wild side lobes of any director mic, but it works in practice - and the comb effect from ground echoes is much less when close to a soft ground surface. keoka 02:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keoka (talk • contribs)

A tag has been placed on Imagen Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

Hi, replied to your comment here.--NapoliRoma (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC) ...and again...--NapoliRoma (talk) 19:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm sorry I didn't. There's a substantial backlog at CAT:CSD. I got to the article, as it was linking to CSD through the hang-on tags. I checked the history and noted there was no accompanying (prior) request for deletion. This makes the hang-on tag invalid as no editor has requested deletion. I therefore removed the tags in order to remove it from the queue at CSD. I'm afraid this wasn't about article clean up but managing the job load at another part of Wikipedia. Again, sorry, but I hope that explains my actions. Pedro :  Chat  10:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Soundcraft colour.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like what you've been doing in adding a lot of great pro audio material to Wikipedia. That said, I wonder what was the intention in splitting Bill Putnam's old UA/UREI from the new company formed by Putnam's sons? Certainly, the new company is different than the old in terms of industry position as a boutique operation rather than as a major player. It's also true there was a large time gap between the two entities where neither was in business. However, the new guys are claiming to be descended from the old company and they are manufacturing (among other things) reproductions of the most famous historic products. That last reason is why I presented both entities on the same page. Binksternet (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I split them out because the original page put a lot of emphasis on the new company which in my opinion is a little start-up and not legend that the original company was. In the late 70/early 80s you could walk into any professional recording studio and you would see many UREI products, speakers, compressors, EQs, etc. If you looked at a medium to large sound reinforcement company you would be likely to see UREI compressors and EQs.

The new company is as you say, a boutique operation. They are recycling old designs and while they offer new products it is unlikely that they will offer any ground breaking products like the LA-3, LA-4 compressors, 813 monitors, or the 537, 539 graphic EQs. The professional market is different these days.

So I think the two pages are about very different companies. The original company with a historic significance and the new company which is an on-going business. I would also like to split out the Chicago and west coast recording studios since I think that they are separate with their own histories. But that is for another day.

Robert.harker (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. It was a jolt to see the page split without discussion. I'll take another look and see if there are further tweaks to be made along the lines you've established. One possibility that comes to mind is to make Universal Audio into a disambiguation page which directs the reader to Universal Audio (album), Universal Audio (company) and Universal Audio (defunct company) or UREI or some such. That, or give the new guys the straight-up Universal Audio link while making the old company be UREI. There are a bunch of options.

I don't want to lose the high-level view where a single article gives the reader an idea of all the wild stuff Bill Putnam was up to. I guess that means copying some material from these various articles and inserting it at the Bill Putnam page. Or at least linking properly. Binksternet (talk) 00:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at creating a disambiguation page but could not find good examples of the wiki syntax to use. Yes it is the right thing to do. A top level Universal Audio page would be nice, but keep it short and sweet. A paragraph for each phase with links to that phase.

Robert.harker (talk) 00:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Yamaha Pro Audio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. PseudoChron (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dbx pro logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Neotek logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:RANE logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I saw Music Center Incorporated on my watch list I did not recognize the name. Most people know the company as simply MCI. I think it would make sense to change the page name from [Music Center Incorporated] to [MCI (audio)] or [MCI (audio manufacturer)]. It is sort of like calling water di-hydrogen oxide rather than h2o. Both are correct, one is much more recognizable

Hi, If you want to change the name of the article leave a redirection page and move the article it to your referred name. Do you know how to do this Chrisfromcanberra (talk)

No, I do not know how to do this. Can you point me to an article telling me how? Robert.Harker (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here the link to the instructions

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages

Look at the section called How to rename a page Chrisfromcanberra (talk)

Sorry for the slow response. I uploaded the images for Sun-2 VME boards and added them to the Sun-2 page. Sun-collector (talk) 03:14, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool! Thanks.

Robert.Harker (talk) 07:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ANVIL Case logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 00:13, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent work on audio topics. Some day I should buy you a beer! Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll buy you a second beer. -—Kvng 14:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your edits I did not find any that did not improve. I've touched up a few of your recent WP:PSP assessments. Here are some simple guidelines that I try to follow in doing assessments. -—Kvng 16:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Quality assessment should be the same for all projects
• Articles marked as stubs should be rated as a stub. Articles not marked as stubs should not be rated as stubs.
• Most articles do not improve quickly so be careful when changing quality rating by more than one grade
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound production/Assessment

I looked at your changes and understand almost all of them. The one I am not sure of is: Bandwidth (signal processing). It seems to be a comprehensive well written article with references. It does seem to be missing some sections like an audio bandwith section. It also only has two references. Are either of these why you downgraded it from C to Start? Same comments about Wave field synthesis. Robert.Harker(talk) 19:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those are borderline, I have no objection to promoting them. Your edits gave a different rating for different projects. Please promote for all projects. -—Kvng 06:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe your encyclopedia.com citation is a valid or useful one. Contemporary sources (e.g., Broadcasting and Broadcast Advertising magazine) clearly indicate that it was known as the "NAB" well before World War II. 121a0012 (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citation please. Your reference to Broadcasting and Broadcast Advertising only says that Harry Shaw was a former National Association of Broadcasters president. Not that the organization was known as National Association of Broadcasters prior to its name change in 1958. See my reference for the year: National Association of Broadcasters Robert.Harker (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American D-22 and D-33 Microphones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ohms (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Warlitner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rigger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Warlitner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Warlitner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Phoebe Snow may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• & Telegraph|AT&T]] and others in order to support herself and her daughter.<ref name="Time">[[https://web.archive.org/web/20110604065934/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,957579-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:3Com Ethernet.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:08, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clair Brothers (Audio), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bogen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your helpful tips about creating references. I have asked Carl's spouse (via his son) for the info box dates and places. Lirani (talk) 03:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's a big no-no, poopie boy. You can discuss it, you can ignore it - but you don't get to delete others' comments on talk pages. Hands off, whoever you think you are. 88.68.172.133 (talk) 17:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete your comment. I undid the change because it was an inappropriate comment left by an anonymous coward which makes it vandalism. I am tempted to undo your anonymous comments again but if you want to make an ass of yourself, be my guest. But next time have the guts to attach your name to it. Robert.Harker (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pacific Gas and Electric Company may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EtherSound, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Crest and QSC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert.Harker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert.Harker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Warlitner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Warlitner (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Sailor 11:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert.Harker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My descriptios for the photos are inadequate. The model is actually the TK-45A. To anyone interested, please cleanup my descriptions. I am not going to.

Here is an email I recieved:

Thanks for these. The cameras came from the Museum of Broadcast Technology in Woonsocket, Rhode Island.

After the show we sent them back to our sister museum, the Texas Broadcast Museum in Kilgore, Texas.

Tom Sprague,

OTO,

Museum of Broadcast Technology

I recall the cameras came from one museum and the electronics from the other. Robert.Harker (talk) 07:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Advanced Media Workflow Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 00:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Media Workflow Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 20:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]