Hi Rlink2, thank you again for making the requested edits to the Dahua Technology article. The last item was inadvertently left out. I reposted that bullet point along with another suggestion in a new edit request. Would you mind taking a look and implementing if all looks good to you? Thanks again, Caitlyn23 (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Caitlyn23

It looks like someone already answered it when I got to it. Is everything you wanted done. If you reword the "partnerships" one then to meet standards maybe I can add it in. Rlink2 (talk) 22:30, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rlink2, thanks for your reply and continued interest in improving the article. I will consider rewording the sentence about Schwarze Berge Wildlife Park. In the meantime, I do have an outstanding edit request regarding the removal of inaccurate terms which were recently added to the article. Would you please take a look and make the necessary changes? Thank you very much, Caitlyn23 (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BareRefBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 15:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what Ghost Archive is, and why you are adding it to so many references? You added over 1,000 today alone. Are you using automation, and do you have a WP:CONSENSUS for what you are doing? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken

It's an archive site that has been around for some time. But its not the only site I use. The reason I'm using it for Financial Times is because web.archive.org can not archive financial times properly. I am doing the edits manually via awb as I have also been doing for a while.

As for the policy/consensus I'm following, see Wikipedia:Citing_sources/Further_considerations#Pre-emptive_archiving: The content of any webpage may change at any moment, or disappear completely. To ensure link accessibility and stability, please consider pre-emptively adding an archive URL from an archive source. Along with the fact I get thanked countless times for my archival edits. Rlink2 (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: Ghostarchive has been around for only a little over one year. There's a current discussion about it going on at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Ghostarchive.org, and there was a discussion last January on the topic of your original question at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1089#Rlink2. Grorp (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am somewhat of a fan of ghostarchive, but I am seeing that a fraction of these archives of ft.com are failing, though they seem to fail in different modes. In some cases, I have successfully re-archived these with ghostarchive, while in other cases, I've been able to use an existing Wayback archive (generally preferring one of the earliest Wayback archives available). With the ghostarchive copies, thereis a popup that you're free to ignore, but if you click on it, you need to click "accept" or you get an error, and that had confused me for a bit).

Nevertheless, manually reviewing these ghostarchive copies (and fixing as needed) is very tedious, and I am completely unfamiliar with any kind of automated/semi-automated processes on WP, so I can only suggest that something needs to be done to either (1) find one of the older Wayback copies which is actually working, or (2) verify that the ghostarchive copy is actually working (and not displaying a page asking you to subscribe). FWIW, if you are making a second ghostarchive copy, there may be an issue if it has the same calendar date (i.e. such that there would be two archive copies that are not distinguished by the date of archive). Workaround for this would be to wait until the date changes or to access the desired version using the internal pathname. Fabrickator (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.

Thank you for the well wishes and Merry Christmas to you as well. Red Director (talk) 21:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Night of Decadence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

EmilySarah99 (talk) 06:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your view would be appreciated here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Police#Photographs Dreddmoto (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I support that "vs" replace "vs." and "v" in boxing match titles.

However, to get consensus on this issue, I've opened an RfC on the issue.

Please comment and offer your opinions on it.

See: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing#rfc 029C646

Thanks, --- Tbf69 userpage • usertalk 19:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you adjust the script you are using to add archive details to references as it keeps adding dates with leading zeros causing a cite error. See as an example. Many thanks. Keith D (talk) 22:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith D thank you, for some reason I thought the citation format wanted leading zeros.......... Rlink2 (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gun Powder Ma,

I see you are interested in technical subjects and you contributed to Concrete.

Would you maybe be inclined to contribute to the discussions concerning the arrangement of the categories on concrete on Wikimedia Commons which JopkeB lists on my talk page.

We are in need of a native speaker with some insight into the matter as currently me as a German, JopkeB from the Netherlands and a Portugese user are struggling with the correct terminology.

thank you very much for you attention,

KaiKemmann (talk) 12:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Rubicon —has been proposed for merging with Crossing the Rubicon. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 22:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great to hear your opinion at Talk:2024 Turkey wildfires#Proposal to merge all years into Wildfires in TurkeyChidgk1 (talk) 08:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]