Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rg161/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Rg161/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rg161! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Rg161/sandbox. Thanks! Waggie (talk) 02:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yvette Duval. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yvette Duval. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rg161,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alinah Kelo Segobye for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rg161 -- I took a look at this draft, and while I can't persuade the sources to download Duval looks notable. Is it a translation from the French article: [1]? If so, this needs to be acknowledged, either in an edit summary or on the talk page. (Usually translators state the source with a link in the edit summary on creation.) If you can clear that up, then I'd be willing to take the sources on faith and accept the draft.

By the way, the Articles for Creation service struggles to handle obscure academics, especially where the sources are not in English. You seem to have a reasonable handle on notability of academics, so I'd suggest in future – unless you have some kind of conflict of interest – you could create them in your sandbox and move them to mainspace when you think they are ready, or ask an experienced editor from an appropriate project to review them for you. (I'd be willing to do this if you ask on my talk page.) Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS You can put {{translated page|SourceLanguageCode|SourcePageTitle|version=123456789|insertversion=987654321|section=name}} on the talk page of a translated article to indicate the source article (and optionally the version) that it was translated from. The instructions are at Template:Translated page. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yvette Duval, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Ipigott (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]