Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

You've uploaded File:SCASDLogo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I need your help, one year ago you talk to me about two photos loaded in Commons because they were pictures and you wanted to know the copyright. I explained you that they were pictures of my family and then everything was Ok. Now I would like to erase these pictures because I have loaded them again with another version. Could you help me? Thank you! The pictures to delete are: Antoni Roca Flaquer.jpg and Antoni Roca Várez.jpg, of fact I have added the delete tag but now I don't know what to do. --Garcia-Roca (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colby's Clubhouse (2nd nomination) for more infomation. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Patstuart. Sé que llego tarde para hacer comentarios en defensa de dos fotos que fueron borradas a sugerencia tuya. Se trata de Image:JOSE_BUCHS.JPG y Image:CARME_VIANCE.jpg Se trata de dos actores antiguos espáñoles y las fotos fueron tomadas en la década de 1920. La razón para el borrado es que no se indica que la muerte del autor fuera anterior a 1938. El problema es que no se sabe quién es el autor (son anónimas) y fueron publicadas en España hace más de 80 años. Mi pregunta es si resulta de aplicación lo previsto en la Ley Española de Propiedad Intelectual [1], en cuyo artículo 27 se dice que, cuando el autor sea desconocido, los derechos duran 70 años desde la publicación, en este caso, de la fotografía. Lo pregunto sobre todo para saber qué hacer en el futuro con retratos anónimos de esa época. Gracias Cvbr, 17 de junio de 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.9.211.6 (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Hawaii Theological Seminary, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaii Theological Seminary. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ἀλήθεια 22:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ctrl-Alt-Del (band). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ctrl-Alt-Del (band) (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Visiongain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 09:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Visiongain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tagged since February 2009 for having no references, has been edited almost exclusively by coi employees and notability has clearly not been established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Teapotgeorge^Talk 16:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sharka Blue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO and general notability guidelines. Reference search reveals only trivial coverage by .reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kantipur English High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability, a search for references found no published (gBooks) references, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suzanne Mizzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Mizzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 19:08, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sweet Noise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7 -- This article about a band does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

I recommend you to read about Philip II to find out why the Portuguese territories are added in the descriptive picture.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felipe_II_de_Espa%C3%B1a#Rey_de_Portugal

Phillip II King of Portugal as well...maybe for just a few years. So technically it is "unquestionably" that these Portuguese lands were Spanish.

Javier Ruibérriz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.169.163 (talk) 11:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Visiongain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visiongain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:25, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Sword of Shannara, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

Hallo Patstuart. A long time ago I had my nickname for the commons chosen with "44penguins". But since some years I can go to the commons with the german nickname "44Pinguine". Now I wish to make only one name here in commons - with the German. Please cold you help me for the procedere? With best regards --44Pinguine (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supercomputing Challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercomputing Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:China Outline.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CptViraj (📧) 10:58, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paper Soldiers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable direct-to-DVD film. No theatrical release, one substantive review, no other coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM, WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yappy2bhere (talk) 05:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]