Home	Talk	My Images	Contributions	Contact me

Hello, O.celebi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Agathoclea (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turks in Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Buda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You may be interested in Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey). The article in your sandbox may also appear in the challange Project. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 17:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Nedim. I'll check it out! O.celebi (talk) 10:35, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Syrian Turkmen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syrian Republic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm wondered, are you Syrian Turkmen? Cheers. Beshogur (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a melting pot, Beshogur :) O.celebi (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You had made a lot of edits to the article and I found you had misinterpreted 7 sources by exaggerate their contents. Most of those edits were clearly against WP:NOR. I've edited them now but next time you will be warned and reported to the admin. Ferakp (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you are well. I do not think "warnings" are necessary when it seems that you have "misinterpreted" several sources - such as removing the 3.5 million estimate from the info box - which is estimated by Arab, English and Turkish sources. O.celebi (talk) 07:49, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nonetheless, I will take objective/useful points on board when editing. O.celebi (talk) 08:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the Syrian Turkmen article has scientific reports, resources, publications and news reports from world-class instituitons and broadcasters to local-scale ones and are from 4-5 different languages. Why is there a "no reliable source" template in the article? Berkaysnklf (talk) 09:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Berkaysnklf, I have just messaged Ferakp to see if he/she is happy to remove the template now. If there are no objections then feel free to remove the template. Best, O.celebi (talk) 17:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, O.celebi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Happy new year! Would you like to add Pakize Tarzi (and of course the other pages you may have created) to the list in Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey). Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 23:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nedim! Yeni yılınız kutlu olsun! Of course; I totally forgot about the challenge. I'll add them in. O.celebi (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you double check the birth/death dates of Mehmed Fuad Carim. Was he really 143 years old? Thanks. --Bamyers99 (talk) 21:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, my mistake! It is 1892 not 1829. Thanks for your message.O.celebi (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had to clarify the situation about the turks in Algeria with 2 or 3 citations I hope you'll respect what every books on the matter say, there's a clear consensus from academic and non academic work. I let some others estimates that seem belivable even if they're not really backed up by any survey or demographic work, and that the website that are quoted doesn't even work (...). The 5% for Oxford group seem ok to me, even if the anatolian-balkanites are arabized today and are considered arabs, same with arab-speaking sub-saharians.

I hope you udnerstand my modification, and i'm ready to discuss if there's a problem.

Hi there, thank you for your message. The problem with your edits is that it is Original Research (see Wikipedia:No original research). In your edits you have written "0% Turkish" but none of your sources actually say "0% Turkish". You need to provide sources which provide information on the Turkish population, not the Arab-Berber population. Because you are making your own conclusions which goes against the rules of Wikipedia. Please not that Wikipedia rules state the following: "This [Original Research] includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented."

Moreover, I am also concerned about how you have treated some of the sources. For example, you have used the Sputnik News source and written "2% (760,000)" in the info box; however, this source actually says "Çeşitli kaynaklara göre, Türklerin Cezayir nüfusundaki oranı yüzde 5 ile yüzde 25 arasında değişiyor." and then it goes on to say "2014 nüfus sayımlarında çıkan 38 milyon kişilik sonuç baz alındığında, 760 bin ile 9,5 milyon arasında bir Türk azınlıktan söz etmek mümkün." (translation: According to various sources, the proportion of Turks in the Algerian population varies between 5 percent and 25 percent...Based on the results of 38 million people in the 2014 census, it is possible to talk about a Turkish minority between 760 thousand and 9.5 million." You did not write in the info box that this source suggests a population of up to 9.5 million (including partial origin). Why not? O.celebi (talk) 12:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "0% turkish" (even if it seem to be a logical deduction to me), I let the cross-datas of the regular/usual ethnic informations about Algeria to make a comparaison with the one info from the turkish author of 1953. Is this better this way?

LuzLuz31 (talk) 08:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking on Wikipedia's rules into consideration. I have removed the excessive use of citations (see Wikipedia:Citation overkill which states "If a page features citations that are mirror pages of others, or which simply parrot the other sources, they contribute nothing to the article's reliability and are detrimental to its readability.") The 2017 edition of the World Factbook is sufficient. I have also placed the U.S. Department of State report regarding the ethnic composition.

In regards to the Turkish author, this is pretty clear in the "population" section of the article, as well as by looking at the footnote itself. As previously mentioned, Sputnik also suggests 5-25%. O.celebi (talk) 11:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the ""Algeria's population, [is] a mixture of Arab, Berber, and Turkish in origin" => What about the Algerian jews and the Algerian sub-saharian? They always represented a big part of the Algerian population, I don't understand how the Department of State could forget historical populations like that.. LuzLuz31 (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman culture and people

Thank you for quality articles about people such as Salah Bey Mosque, Ahmad Nami, for adding to Turks in Germany and Syrian Turkmen, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:40, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1679 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you have created 2 more articles, I would advise you put yourself forward at the above link. At the moment, your articles go through New Page Patrol, adding to the backlog there, and aren't indexed by Google for up to 90 days. This would remove that. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. O.celebi (talk) 23:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi O.celebi, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Malinaccier. Happy editing to you too! O.celebi (talk) 19:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, not many people with 26 articles have shown what's necessary to be given this right. Your quality articles are a real benefit to Wikipedia, especially as they are on areas and nationalities we lack coverage for. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Your contributions are much appreciated. Please, do not forget to update the %-figure in the banner also. Thanks. CeeGee 17:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.11% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for October: Women and disability Healthcare Geofocus: Nordic countries Continuing from month to month: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 10:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ipigott, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have just joined and look forward to working with you all. Regards, O.celebi (talk) 18:35, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

O.celebi: I'm very happy to see you've become a member. I hope you will cover many more Egyptian women for us. If ever you run into any problems, please let me know. You are of course always welcome to contribute to our WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of European Merit
		I, Vami_IV, award the Barnstar of European Merit to O.Celebi for their participation in the European 10,000 Challenge, no matter how minor. –Vami_IV✠ 02:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
		this WikiAward was given to O.celebi by Vami_IV✠ on 02:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vami_IV, That is very kind of you, thanks! Happy editing O.celebi (talk) 19:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, O.celebi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, There is no reliable source that proves that the late Egyptian actor Farid Shawqi had any Turkish origins. Even the unrelaible source provided in the article is actually broken. --KawatharUAE (talk) 02:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syrian Turkmen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BBC English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syrian Turkmen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Khirurg (talk) 17:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Khirurg (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

The recent history of Turkish people can be viewed at:

• Turkish people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You already seem to have made four reverts on this article on 20 June alone, which breaks the WP:3RR rule. This is a highly visible article, so an edit war there risks being reported. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston, I reverted twice. O.celebi (talk) 18:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, EdJohnston is right. As a sign of good faith, would you consider self-reverting? Otherwise I will report this to WP:AN3. Khirurg (talk) 18:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted at 17:25, 20 June 2018‎ and then again at 17:29, 20 June 2018‎; if I revert again then it will be 3 reverts. O.celebi (talk) 18:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello O.celebi. I'm prepared to count your large removals of existing content (without any previous talk page discussion or agreement) as part of the pattern of disruptive editing, when considering if I should block your account. But if you want to back away from the edge, there is still time. Any hint that you will defer to consensus (or will help negotiate one) would be welcome. EdJohnston (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am more than happy to talk with you all, as long as it is civilised. If we come to some compromises on the talk page is it ok to remove or add certain things without being blocked. O.celebi (talk) 18:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can avoid a block if you will undo your last change. EdJohnston (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted myself. I want to make clear that I did this not to avoid being blocked (which has never happened to me on Wikipedia) but rather to shown that I truly do seek to work together. Whether other parties truly seek to improve this article objectively will be seen. Kind regards to both of you. O.celebi (talk) 18:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. EdJohnston (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

https://www.google.com Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 23:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian Turkmen'de ki saçmalıklara bir göz atarmısın lütfen? Selçuk Denizli (talk) 12:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, O.celebi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

We have a featured topic to review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Al Sharq Forum logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Syrian topographers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]