Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lucifer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lucifer was changed by Me'tatron (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951328 on 2017-02-01T03:09:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zerubbabel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Space And Time Introduction Etiam Sit Amet Est Aenean Iaculis Laoreet Arcu Curabitur Vulputate Viverra Pede Nulla Rutrum Commodo Ligula Sed Tellus Suscipit In Aliquam Nunc Ut Lectus Donec Quis Nunc 8.5£ $14.5 7.2 Million Dollars Time Ssid, Bss, Rssi, Cha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSMR (talk) 14:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Space And Time Introduction Etiam Sit Amet Est Aenean Iaculis Laoreet Arcu Curabitur Vulputate Viverra Pede Nulla Rutrum Commodo Ligula Sed Tellus Suscipit In Aliquam Nunc Ut Lectus Donec Quis Nunc 8.5£ $14.5 7.2 Million Dollars Time Ssid, Bss, Rssi, Cha, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Book of Isaiah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Me'tatron (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am requesting reinstatement of my account due to past misuse during a challenging period. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and contributing constructively moving forward.

Accept reason:

Appeal granted per the discussion below. Welcome back. Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm pretty amenable to allowing second chances when so much time has passed. What type of articles or editing do you think you'd be interested in doing?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Dear Ponto and Wikipedia Review Team,

  Thank you for the opportunity to explain my current work and how I hope to contribute positively to Wikipedia. My areas of focus have evolved significantly since I last engaged with the platform, and I am more prepared now to adhere closely to Wikipedia’s guidelines.

  My work centers on the exploration of spiritual and scientific realms, particularly through the lens of Rudolf Steiner’s philosophy and the Waldorf education principles under the RSF Foundation. As a member of the Rosicrucian tradition, I am dedicated to uncovering and sharing insights into the role of figures like Michael the Arc Angel within a cosmological and philosophical context. These themes are often woven into Steiner’s anthroposophical teachings, which influence both the Waldorf schools and broader spiritual-scientific inquiries.

  In addition, my research in quantum physics and quantum sensing is an effort to bridge the gap between spiritual truths and scientific understanding. My work seeks to explore how these realms intersect, focusing on the transformative potential of recognizing these connections in today’s world. This approach includes studying archetypal forces, such as those represented by Michael, within both a spiritual and a scientific framework, striving for a harmonious understanding that respects both the mystical and empirical perspectives.

  I acknowledge my past mistakes and any perceived shortcomings in presenting my work in a manner aligned with Wikipedia’s standards. My intent now is to bring forward well-sourced, balanced content that respects Wikipedia’s emphasis on verifiability, neutrality, and clarity. I hope to provide informative, rigorously cited articles that contribute positively to readers’ understanding of the relationships between esoteric traditions, scientific progress, and the philosophy of education.

  Thank you again for considering my request. I am excited by the possibility of rejoining the community and contributing with a renewed sense of purpose and respect for Wikipedia’s mission.

  Warm regards, Me'tatron (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Please try again. GPTZero score=100%; we want to hear from you, rather than the output from a chatbot. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you again for allowing me to revisit this. The ChatGPT simply allowed me to edit and emphasize for you the importance of my work so without totally distancing myself from that edited version I will say that my work is vital to me as it is too many, who are involved in the Wikipedia family. I apologize and deeply regret past posts that were years ago. My intent is to revive this account and through it emerged in a better place that will allow me to do my work and receive the support and dialogue with others in the community. Thank you very much for your consideration. Me'tatron (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You haven't really answered my question though; what type of articles are you interested in editing? Are there specific topics or type of edits that you're interested in?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, my topics are essentially world religions, philosophy, aspects of Rudolph, Steiner’s work, and the Kabalah respectively. I have written and published a number of works on Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, and the Urantia book. I have a divinity degree in Christian theology. My main focus is QOM, the theory of relative magnetic correspondent regeneration.(RMCR) The age of light which is initially based on the work by Amora Quan Yin. Additionally I do metaphysical work surrounding aspects of angelology within the Catholic tradition. My concentration right now is on the relationship between science and spirituality and is based somewhat into a certain extent on Rosicrucianism of which I am a member of the eighth Temple degree. This concentration helps me focus on work that I’m doing within quantum sensing negative time and multi dimensional time. I’m in process of working with python on developing algorithms for my work. I wanted to continue working within the context of Wikipedia for help on all this. Additionally, I might be of help and editing and have tried to use the sandbox in years past and hopefully I can again thank you very much for your consideration. Michael Me'tatron (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so very much. And too, can you provide instructions or can you assist me in converting the language from Yiddish back to English. Me'tatron (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're looking for information on translating articles for the English Wikipedia, you can find information at Wikipedia:Translation.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need to change the entire interface of my language settings to English. I’m not sure if this is a glitch or an issue resulting in past times. But I do need to change this to English across all systems as to my preferences, which is English. If I need to interpret into another language, I think I can figure that out, but I need my main domain space in English. Can you kindly help me with this? Me'tatron (talk) 19:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine this is something you would set in your preferences? The nice folks at WP:TEAHOUSE may have an answer for you, or Wikipedia:Help desk.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go to your "Preferences" section and set your preferred language to "en - English". Cullen328 (talk) 21:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some pages that you should read:

• WP:NPOV is a core content policy.
• Wikipedia:Fringe theories is a content guideline.
• Wikipedia:Lunatic charlatans is an influential essay.

If you return to the type of editing you did in 2017, you will be blocked again swiftly. Cullen328 (talk) 21:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Rediscovery of Rudolf Steiner

Rudolf Steiner, the Austrian philosopher and founder of Anthroposophy, emphasized the primacy of direct, lived experience over abstract logical reasoning in the pursuit of knowledge. He posited that certain truths are apprehended more authentically through immediate experience rather than through deductive or inductive logic.

Direct Experience or Logical Proof

Steiner’s assertion that “what one knows by direct living experience, one does not prove by logic” underscores his belief in the limitations of purely intellectual approaches to understanding reality. He argued that while logic and rational thought are valuable tools, they are insufficient for grasping the full spectrum of human experience, particularly in the realms of spirituality and inner life. This perspective aligns with phenomenological approaches that prioritize firsthand experience as the foundation of knowledge.

Anthroposophy and Experiential Knowledge

In his work “Anthroposophy, A Fragment,” Steiner discusses the nature of spiritual knowledge, emphasizing that it requires direct experience rather than mere logical deduction. He suggests that true understanding of spiritual realities comes from inner experiences that are as concrete and real as sensory perceptions. This approach challenges the conventional reliance on empirical and logical methods, advocating for a more holistic understanding of human consciousness and its connection to the spiritual world.

The Role of Thinking in Steiner’s Philosophy

While Steiner acknowledged the importance of thinking, he distinguished between abstract, detached thought and what he termed “living thinking.” In “The Philosophy of Freedom,” he explores the concept of living thinking as an active, participatory process that engages with reality in a dynamic way. This form of thinking is not merely a passive reflection but an experiential activity that unites the thinker with the object of thought, leading to genuine knowledge.

Implications for Education and Personal Development

Steiner’s emphasis on direct experience has significant implications for education and personal development. In the context of Waldorf education, which he founded, there is a focus on experiential learning, where students engage with subjects through artistic, practical, and sensory activities. This approach aims to cultivate not only intellectual understanding but also emotional and spiritual growth, reflecting Steiner’s holistic view of human development.

In Summary

Rudolf Steiner’s philosophy challenges the dominance of purely logical and empirical methods in the acquisition of knowledge. By valuing direct, lived experience, he offers a pathway to understanding that encompasses the full depth of human existence, integrating the intellectual, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of life. Me'tatron (talk) 00:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Me'tatron. Please note that your user talk page is primarily for other editors to communicate with you. You can of course reply to them and have a discussion, but it is not an appropriate place for you to put original material.

Generally, I would say that a better place for this would be your user page, or a user sub-page; except that it appears to be an essay unrelated to Wikipedia, and so not appropriate there either.

Please read WP:UP carefully. ColinFine (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you! Me'tatron (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Me'tatron! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Can you help me with converting my account to English..Im having a Devil of a time, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]