Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Hi Prashant. According to your suggestion, can you please suggest some nice Bengali articles that I can concentrate on? Thanks a lot. :) --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 19:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

I think you should work on Charulata, the ageless classic by Satyajit Ray.—Prashant 19:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

That's a beautiful suggestion Prashant! I have tears in my eyes seeing that you know about the film. You are so intelligent. What would I do without your suggestion? :-) --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 19:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

OMG! You are never gonna to behave properly. I know that you are making a fun of me by saying so. Please, don't you think it's a bad thing to criticize. Anyway, I told you because it looks like you are more interested in Bengali articles (which is a good thing).—Prashant 19:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

OMG! I am not making fun of anyone. How can you even say that? I know that you always mean very well, and so do I. Now I am crying even more. :( --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 19:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

OH please, keep away your crocodile tears from my talk page. Not interested in your talk.—Prashant 19:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Please don't say that. I am feeling so bad now. I am really sorry if I did something wrong. But I can never do anything wrong, especially to someone as good as you. Please don't say this. Btw, what is crocodile tears? --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 19:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	To the kindest and best editor on Wikipedia. You make everyone's day special. :-) smarojit (buzz me) 19:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank You so much Smarojit. So sweet of you. I think I deserve this. You must be right because you are very experienced and a senior editor. Thank You.—Prashant 07:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Well! What you said was right, but tell me something that why an established director someone like Abbas Mustan will wait for a new girl and that too for starting a film. It's not Hollywood, where casting is done on the basis of the script and role. I added that because I got that source during working on Aitraaz. That's why I thought to correct it.—Prashant 20:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Cause they wanted a Miss India in their film? How should I know what they were thinking? Just please don't add/delete stuff that causes controversy with other editors, and try to imagine what a FAC reviewer like Victoria might think. The sentences in a section have to go cleanly together. BollyJeff | talk 20:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Chopra confessed that she could not be able to due the film because of dates problem. At the end of the day, she wasn't able to do that. That is enough to mention. It is clear that Chopra left the film. But, from the current version it seems she was thown out of the film as replaced by Patel. It's fine to say that she could not do the film due to date problems. Chopra had told the same thing in all her interviews.—Prashant 20:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

The current story is much more interesting to read: They would wait, she signed other films, so they went with someone else. Saying only that the dates were conflicting is very boring and makes the whole thing not notable. But since it shows some possible negativity (being replaced), even though it also has positivity (of them waiting), you are not interested, right? Shame on you. BollyJeff | talk 20:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

This is BLP, it is not a fiction which is for fun. What do you mean by interesting? For BLP, true facts are necessary, it doesn't seems original and I don't think so, its about positvity or negativity. For example, Balan's page says Balan was replaced in over 13 films for being lebelled as jinxed. Did those directors confirmed? So, still that was there. If you follow Chopra's interviews...she only talks about the films, she acted in not about those which she left and didn't happened. Humraaz is the only film, for which she's confesses that she signed but left. She is true.—Prashant 20:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Someone else please comment; I am too busy for this. BollyJeff | talk 20:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Blofeld explain this. Prashant, Bollyjeff is talking about interesting prose, which is essential for FAC, not proseline, diary entry of a secretary. If you get the drift. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 03:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, Victoria has correct the whole thing which I wanted, so leave it here.—Prashant 03:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

[1] [2] Any wonder why nobody wants anything to do with you Prashant? I told you to stop taking everything personally and to change and five days in and you're still acting like it. How you act will always be mirrored so you're digging a hole for yourself on wikipedia by behaving like this. Whatever you do with expanding articles, if you can't conduct yourself in a basic decent manner nobody will respect you and treat you like certain others on here. Somehow I think you'll never change, or if you do it'll be too late.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 05:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I expected another scold from you. First try to learn the whole history. If you can't see the tricks hidden under Smarojit's sugary quoted post. Then, I'm sorry I can't help it. He was saying I'm crying, you broke my heart....then he posted a star which other editors were pissed off. See [Here]. It proves that he was joking by entering a sqabble to get me into a heated argument. Other editors are also concerned about smaro's behavior like User: Murrallli. I removed that star because Bio said that star is pissing him. Jeff said that I would keep by assuming that it is an appreciation. See full history and then, reach a consensus.—Prashant 06:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

What irritates me is that I really do want to see the good in you as an editor and for you to show that you're making an effort to control yourself. Just when you start to impress with your article expansion work you go and blow it by acting like that. If he is using sugary language to wind you up, why not just smile, say "thanks sweety pie", and move on? See if you can go a full month without reacting to other editors...♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 06:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank God!, you finally understood what the whole thing was about. You are right. That's why I did not reacted to a recent comment of Pleasant on Smaro's talk page. I'll not react to their comments. And, will keep his post and that star as he is a senior editor. He must be right for that star.—Prashant 06:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

If it was me, I would not keep the star because you know it was a joke. I have rejected stars in the past that were not sincere. It's your call, though. BollyJeff | talk 13:59, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Who told you I'm going to keep the star? I temporarily added to my user page, because Smarojit should be ashamed of doing that thing.—Prashant 14:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Haha. BollyJeff | talk 14:11, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

OMG I am sooo ashamed. I am crying again. --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 14:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Why are you crying smaro? You are brave. Be happy for what you did.—Prashant 14:14, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Because I am not half as brave as you are sweetheart. I wish I could. You are my hero. :) --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 14:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

But, you are one of the best editors on Wikipedia. You should be happy.—Prashant 14:22, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Aww thank you, that changed my life. But you are bestestest!! :-) :-) --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 14:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

I am ROTFLMAO now, but please stop you two. BollyJeff | talk 14:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Bollyjeff, that's why I didn't replied him.—Prashant 14:45, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Just for the record, Smarojit has made less than five thousand edits, which makes him a fairly junior and inexperienced editor. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

I have reviewed your Good Article nomination and mentioned some issues. SL93 (talk) 04:00, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I fixed all of them.—Prashant 04:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Copy-edit Done—feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:38, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

- Vivvt (Talk) 02:38, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

		The Good Article Barnstar
		This is for making Fashion a good article. Keep up the good work. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Priyanka Chopra filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations, and good work on getting this done so quickly. BollyJeff | talk 22:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

You are already getting nasty. Please STFU!!!

If you see my history of two weeks, I didn't reacted to anyone and what nasty about? I'm replying everything calmly and in gentle way. If you thought that I'm being nasty, then it is your problem. What is your problem? It's very strange that you think that way. Also, I have forgot reacting like pressure cooker, im being sweet to everyone. So cheers.—Prashant 04:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Prashant, I'm concerned already that you're too involved in this FAC and that your overeagerness to respond to messages will backfire. I haven't the slightest bit of confidence that it'll pass and I'm just waiting for you to step over the mark and Graham instantly archive it. If you continue as you have been I think it's a foregone conclusion that it'll happen again. As much as I don't like saying this, I don't think the article is safe at FAC until you're banned from being involved with it, and I really mean that because you can't take anybody's advice and understand that the best thing for you to do is to stay away from it. It stands more of a chance passing without you around the FAC, and I'm pretty sure other reviewers would feel more comfortable without seeing you around the FAC commenting on everything. But again in your desperation to pass it and respond to messages you can't see how much of a threat you are to it. If it happens again and fails I'll have been proved right. Just think about what I've said.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 08:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Now, what I have done blofeld? Tell me. I think these unwanted warnings are making me feel like I'm a villain and I the worst person here. Who told you I'm eager to take it to FAC? I'm busy with several other articles. I only resolved the comments by Karthik. That's all. Tell me what to do? Bollyjeff is behaving like (you what he mean). I hadn't done anything wrong. Please, tell mee what is my fault?—Prashant 09:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Since you cannot understand what you are doing wrong, then please allow Blofeld and myself handle some of the comments and change requests. It is not an issue of how fast they are addressed, ya know. BollyJeff | talk 15:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, go for it. I'll be offline from tomorrow as I'll be traveling for some days.—Prashant 16:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

I see you didn't take our advice. OK, fair enough, now's your chance to shine and meet Victoria's points without complaining. Best of luck, I'm watching the situation.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, just logged in the morning as I needed some serious rest after traveling. I think Bollyjeff resolved all the comments by Victoria. I would have done in the same way Bollyjeff did (without complaining). I'm more relaxed and calm now. Thanks for making me learn everything.—Prashant 01:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Glad to see, and the relaxed, patience approach has resulted in a support from Victoria. Let's keep it up..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 08:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I think calmness and relaxation are very important thing. I have put all these in my mind and now, im relaxed and I don't get angry. And, ya happy for the support from Victoria!—Prashant 08:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Prashant, I left comments at Talk:National Film Award for Best Supporting Actress earlier, and assumed that you would see them. Obviously that didn't happen, but the comments are there for you to consider at your leisure. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:19, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Does the source that you added say that Exotic video was released on the 11th? I think not. Twitter is allowed if it is not an outrageous claim, and is coming from someone close to the subject. See WP:TWITTER and WP:twitter. Why do you always doubt me? BollyJeff | talk 03:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I hadn't read anything about twitter on Wikipedia. I removed because one moron removed my twitter post ref from her first song article. That's why, I removed. Also, I don't have doubt on you as I just wanted to add a source with more information. I thought someone will come up with a list of unrealible source (we just requested) a source review.—Prashant 03:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Well the Twitter source at least gives the exact date; Perez Hilton source could have been written days after actual release. Lets see if we can find another one giving the release date. I am sure one will come soon. BollyJeff | talk 03:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, several sources are about to come. Cheers!—Prashant 03:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Prashant,

Just curious to know why you reverted my edit on the Priyanka Chopra filmography page. I thought it would be more helpful to put the numbers in crores, since that is what most of us associate with (I am Indian as well). Please let me know. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subbupedia95 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I don't think that only read Wikipedia. Everyone from each part of the world comes here for information about various subjects. I think everyone need to know about the Indian as well as American currency. This is not arguable. So, pls don't do that again.—Prashant 17:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Prashant,

I'm not sure what makes you think you have more authority than me, but I have now updated the page so that it compromises between my version and your version. This version would best suit both an Indian and a non-Indian audience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subbupedia95 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I left the review you requested there. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Can you believe it? Finally a pass today!!! Congratulations to us all. BTW, Sholay happened today too. BollyJeff | talk 22:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For your efforts in helping promote Priyanka Chopra to FA and making an effort to learn from your mistakes. A magnificent achievement and a shining day for Indian cinema on wikipedia with Sholay passing too!! A hearty congrats!! Tibetan Prayer ᧾ 10:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

• I have to add my congratulations too. Good job on learning from your mistakes and taking a positive outlook. (Did you end up using any of my comments about Fashion?) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Blof or Dr. B will do fine still.Tibetan Prayer ^᧾ 17:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! You could make it your goal now to make Chopra a featured topic and get all of her films up to FA!Tibetan Prayer ^᧾ 18:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Featured topic! Hmmmm. I can only try (though her recent expanded articles are FA worthy). Can you tell me, how many (at least) articles are needed to make it a featured topic?—Prashant 18:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Not sure if it would even quality given that the film she stars in may not be considered "her" films, and have directors and other actors also with the same claim. You could ask at FA on that if it could qualify. A goal at least could be to get all of her films up to GA status.Tibetan Prayer ^᧾ 18:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

All articles to GA?? OMG! That would be a very tough task to do. Indian media doesn't cover every aspect. I think it would be far more difficult.—Prashant 18:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for your tireless work to help get Priyanka Chopra to FA. BollyJeff | talk 18:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you bollyjeff! It means a lot when you get appreciation from an editor, whom you respect. I think it was amazing journey to take the article to FA. Thanks again.—Prashant 18:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Priyanka Chopra filmography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Kapoor]]. After its release, the film received highly positive reviews and is considered as a [[Cult film].<ref>{{cite web|title=Shahid-Priyanka's Kaminey sequel very much on cards|url=http://

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Prashant, Good move on withdrawing the Chopra filmog. It's not too far away from an FLC, but there are several things that need to be seriously looked at before re-nominating. Once the FLC has been officially withdrawn and you are able to open another PR, drop me a line and I'll have a spin through it again with advice etc. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 10:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

I really don't want to wait a year for this. I intend to nominate it for 13 September, the anniversary of "In My City", unless you know of a better date this year. I hope that you will support this; Blofeld said that he would. I will be making a blurb in my User:Bollyjeff/sandbox. Right now it holds the original one that I did for Sholay. The final one is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, which has an open spot for 13 September. If you want to contribute, be my guest; but use the sandbox until we both agree. Maybe you can nominate it too, to get one point for your first. BollyJeff | talk 20:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, I preferred it the way it was, because it summarized her (since this is a BLP), and not just her movie career. I think its also a bit too long now. They have very strict length requirements. But I don't really care if you want to try it like this. Any negative comments though, don't argue about it, and put back my version if it seems more like what they are looking for, okay? I will leave it in my sandbox for now. BollyJeff | talk 22:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Who said I am not compromising? I said do it your way if you want... and you did. Good luck. BollyJeff | talk 13:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 12:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

I'd like to let you know that my comments here apply to you as well. I strongly advise both you and Smarojit to behave as civilized human beings; regardless of who was in the wrong originally, you have together escalated this dispute to the point where discussion really is futile. Smarojit has agreed to stop, and I have faith that you too will realize that there are better things to do on Wikipedia than bicker. Thank you. Theopolisme (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I dont want to even talk about that user. He is always interested in disputes. Please tell him to stay away from me as i'm here to work other than taunt, misbehave, frustrate others.—Prashant 07:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I advise you to do the same. Again, regardless of whose "fault" it is, the best thing to do now is to simply let it go. Theopolisme (talk) 07:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I will as im here to work and not to take part in disputes like others. Thank You.—Prashant 07:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Though reverting edits to your own user page is generally not considered edit warring (see EW), may I suggest you not form a habit of quickly reverting edits you disagree with? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For your amazing work on Priyanka Chopra-related articles, you deserve this! --Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 15:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Although this is not yet a personal attack, you may want to stop being so antagonistic with him. Remember, discuss the points at hand and not the editor. Otherwise your not going to get any work done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not saying I support his position, I'm saying you need to take the higher road when discussing issues related to him. In the current atmosphere, a lot can be construed as a blockable personal attack... which I'm sure you don't want. Focus on countering his arguments, with references, if you think he is wrong. Remember, AGF — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to see that you're still not getting on, but Prashant you do have a habit of irking people off by what you say and do, even if you don't mean it. I was a little annoyed to see several posts on my talk page with capital letters and that typical forceful emotional blackmail tone I find most off-putting. If you really want somebody to do something it really is best to be patient and not resort to that sort of thing. Brian Boulton didn't like it either. Anyway, I've made the edits I felt were necessary to promote the list, I've also asked Cassianto for some input before nomming, hope this is OK.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

I just saw it. Wow looks amazing. You are a magician Blofeld. Thanks. But, you can't deny im improving my behaviour.—Prashant 17:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Ah I see what happened with Cassianto. A pity that. But I do hope you'll try to remember to approach people you want to review with a more relaxed manner in future! I've had a wedding to help organize and attend and have tired of wikipedia of late, I hope you understand. Never mind. I think it's close to what is required now, I'll ask Schrod to take another look at it and you can then nom. You've done a great job with mentioning the awards and filtering down the repetitive successes anyway. I gather you like the image of her in orange? I'd be tempted to go for the 2008 dark red dress image myself or something a bit more formal.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Ya, change it if you want. I was guilty of that message at cass page. I wanted to nominate it soon as I will get busy in my studies from 12 August. Anything more to say?—Prashant 17:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Would you mind if we moved it to a non-specific day? You will still have 4 points even without an anniversary date of any kind. I don't know how to do it properly and don't want to make a mistake, but maybe if you say you want it done and ask, someone else will do it. BollyJeff | talk 21:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Well, I will move it o 14 September as Barfi! is most important film of her career. So, dont worry my friend. You should be happy that Sholay will be on the main ppage on its anniversery. I wish we could wait for Chopra for next year as it will not get delisted as long as I'm here.—Prashant 02:39, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Never mind now. She got scheduled for August 14, and Sholay got dropped, boo hoo. BollyJeff | talk 14:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations! Now, you'll wait for next year and got Chopra for this year. It is just because of you that the article will be on main page on 14 Aug. and not on her Birthday. Happy No? This is disgusting Bollyjeff. Now, your article will still appear on anniversary and chopra on film anniversary. Do you want awards for this?—Prashant 15:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

You are mad? I can never figure you out. Yes, you should be praising me. You should be happy it's gonna be on the front page any day. Most people would be very happy, check out the picture here: User:Shshshsh#Important_steps. It wan't on her birthday either. Anyway, it looks like its gonna be hard to ever get Sholay on, but I am gonna try again soon. BollyJeff | talk 16:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

It's okay. I'll have her filmography on her birthday.—Prashant 16:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't have much experience with FLC. Plus, the lead reads ok now. Also, schrocat and Blofeld had looked at it. So, it might be good to go.--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:25, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Well, the article has improved a lot during the PR. Thanks.—Prashant 02:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

This is a note to let the main editors of Priyanka Chopra know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on August 14, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 14, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Priyanka Chopra

Priyanka Chopra (born 1982) is an Indian film actress and singer, and was the winner of the Miss World pageant of 2000. She has become one of Bollywood's highest-paid actresses and one of the most popular celebrities in India. She has won a National Film Award for Best Actress and Filmfare Awards in four categories. She made her acting debut in the Tamil film Thamizhan in 2002. The following year, she starred in The Hero, her first Hindi film release, and followed it with the box-office hit Andaaz. She subsequently earned critical recognition as a seductress in the 2004 thriller Aitraaz. By 2006, Chopra had established herself as a leading actress of Hindi cinema with starring roles in the highly successful films Krrish and Don. After receiving mixed reviews for a series of unsuccessful films, she received critical acclaim for her portrayal of unconventional characters, including a troubled model in the 2008 drama Fashion, a feisty Marathi woman in the 2009 caper thriller Kaminey, a serial killer in the 2011 neo-noir 7 Khoon Maaf, and an autistic woman in the 2012 romantic comedy Barfi! She released her first music single "In My City" in 2012, and her second single "Exotic" in 2013. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Well, I nominated it for peer review as to improve the quality of the article. Also you will have no problem to resume the expansion of the article during the PR process. If you have any problem, then I can withdraw my nomination. Regards, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 10:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Alright, then ;)----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 11:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for the bunch of sources that you collected. Although I have not read them yet, surely they will be helpful. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Good news! Jab Tak Hai Jaan has just passed the GA review!----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 13:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it happened right as the clock turned 00. So cool!! BollyJeff | talk

Yup!!—Prashant 00:39, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

• I extend my felicitations for PC's presence on the Main Page. Nice work! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.—Prashant 15:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Congrats for getting Priyanka Chopra to Today's Featured Article!----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 12:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Pleasant! —Prashant 12:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I wondered if you or anybody you know would be interested in improving this very important list?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Okay...ill grab it as it is very important for Indian cinema. Lets collaborate on this one. I'm interested in it.—Prashant 12:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Certainly will be a challenge! One of the most important lists for India on wikipedia in my opinion. On the Kaminey front, still awaiting your response to the review I did almost a week ago...♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I just looked to it. Also, you should have informed me about that review as I was thinking that a bot will inform me. Like recent GA nominations! But, that bot didn't reached my talkpage. Also, not even you told me. You should have dropped a line. Okay I'll be resolving your comments.—Prashant 13:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I took for granted that you'd trust me to keep my word on reviewing it on that day...♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I trust you more than myself but, It got away from my after that day and was thinking that if you would have grabbed than that Bot will inform me that's why i didn't checked. Also, i have just stepped in my University life, so I'm attending every single lectures, classes, workshops and studies.—Prashant 14:00, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Priyanka Chopra filmography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ! scope="row" style="background:#FFFFCC;"| ''[[Zanjeer (2013 film)|Zanjeer]]'' (''Thoofan'' in Telugu {{dagger|alt=Film has yet to be released}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

You removed important edits in the article www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aashiqui_2. Please read the edits before removing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.177.231 (talk) 16:45, 25 August 2013 (UTC)