What exactly do you need help with? Samuella99 21:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your template: Barcelona is a city of Spain, Europe. It has XXX inhabitants. Translates to: Barcelona ke toropo kgolo kwa Spain, Europa. E na le baagi ba le XXX.

Samuella99 (talk) 18:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jeneme. I responded to your translation request on my talk page. Keep up the good work. Tebello TheWHAT!!?? 13:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Jeneme,

Sorry, I do not speak Fijian. Nevertheless, if you wish to know more about the Fijian language and culture, feel free to visit FijiTuwawa. --Jose77 (talk) 07:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Regards this edit, Eran doesn't appear to be editing much anymore; you may have more luck sending an e-mail (if enabled). WLU (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Newton Study Center, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newton Study Center. Thank you. Jojit (talk) 07:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you send an email at Temp001@4x.ro, so that i can get in touch with you. It seems that i can't contact you thought the 'E-mail this user' option. Thanks. AKoan (talk) 10:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encontré tu página de usuario en la versin escocesa (scots) de la wikipedia. ¡Me dio que pensar en cuál es tu idioma natal! Me gustaría ver una caja de usuario que la represente en tus páginas de usuario. ¡Si no existe, creémosla!

Yo también veo como prioridad el desarallo wikipediano en idiomas minoritarios. Mi idoma natal es el inglés general americano. Hablo español mexicano como segundo idioma. Sé algo de otros dialectos de éstes y de idomas relacionadas, como el ladino, el portuguese, y el escoces. ¡Colaboremos! Deja un comentario en mi página de discusión y favor de mencionar tu idioma natal. ¡Que te vaya bien! --Infoporfin (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por tu interés. Mi lengua natal es el castellano (me refiero al dialecto castellano del español, con sus particularidades). Hablo también el inglés y un poco de francés. Entiendo y puedo escribir un poco en italiano, portugués, gallego, catalán, aragonés, y judeo-español. (No es mucho, la verdad es que me gustan las lenguas, pero se me dan muy mal). La verdad, a mí también me encanta colaborar con las wikipedias pequeñas. Es más, tengo un wikiproyecto en la Wikipedia en español (aquí), que trata de eso, pásate si quieres.

Si quieres, podemos ir organizando algún plan para ir ayudando. Yo suelo estar en la wikipedia en judeo-español, en la de interlingue (que voy a ver si me hacen administrador, me parece que me están dando largas, y eso que soy el único que escribe allí), en la de chamorro, setwana, tsivenda y en extremeño. Suelo ayudar en el resto, pero principalmente en esas.

Si quieres que colaboremos en cualquier wikipedia, dímelo y voy para allá. Yo suelo pedir que me traduzcan una plantilla sobre un municipio y luego la utilizo para ir haciendo localidades y ciudades. --Jeneme 15:43, 12 Juin 2008 (UTC)

Sí, ¡colaboremos! Estaré en contacto contigo aqí. --Infoporfin (talk) 20:38, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, el castellano, con razón, pero, en eso caso debes usar la plantilla {{Babel|es}} sin ningún letra ni numero. Cito el artículo es:Wikipedia:Babel:

4...es usado por quienes...quieren dar a entender que no es su lengua familiar o aprendida en la infancia...

Con la plantilla {{es-4}}, ¡das pa confundirse, hombre! 8^)

--Infoporfin (talk) 20:38, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Èric Bertran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Charles Matthews (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Do you speak Jumieka Langwi? [1] I'm thinking of create a Wikipedia to this Patois. Would you help me? --Jeneme (talk) 10:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is already an article entitled Jamaican Creole. You could simply add to that, instead of creating a new article. On a different note, it may be a little difficult to create an article or to even write a small section about a "language" such as this, since it's so flexible. There is no right or wrong way of peaking our Patois, and there are no "grammar rules". It's a dialect that varies even within particular towns and areas of Jamaica. Can't generalize. Anyway, I'll see what I can do to help. Orane (talk) 03:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. My knowledge of the languages you enquired about is very basic. I will try to help where and if I can. Keep up the good work! Regards : Sadness Sa (talk) 09:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite sorry but I do not presume that I have the necessary understanding of Wolof to actually edit a Wikipedia. But I'll try to help whenever it'll be possible. Thank you very much for the invitation. --RasNehemia (talk) 09:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeneme,
I'm sorry but unfortunately I can't read or write Zulu and can only speak it (and my ability in that is sorely lacking.) As such I'm afraid I can't really help you, although I wish you the best of luck with it!
Thanks,
OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 16:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Hice el artículo de Almazán en la Wikipedia en náhuatl aquí.--Fluence (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I perhaps was a bit overzealous. I took a beginner's class and had the intention of becoming proficient, partly because I am very saddened by the state of the Xhosa-language Wikipedia and want to improve it, but instead the opposite has happened (all my own fault) and my linguistic ability remains terrible. --Watman (talk) 11:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Jeneme, te he dejado un mensaje en mi pagina de usuario, User talk:Kjetor, sobre tu pregunta de ayudarte con traducir isiXhosa. —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Muchas gracias por traer el artículo sobre Rosario Ustáriz Borra aquí. Es muy interesante ver cómo existe interés por la literatura en aragonés, felicidades. --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 18:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (an:Usuario:Manuel Trujillo Berges)[reply]

Pues cuenta con toda la ayuda que sea necesario, --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

En realidad, an:cheso es un adjetivo que se refiere a los abitantes del valle de Hecho (an:Bal d'Echo), por lo que sería mejor Cheso Aragonese. El an:Aragonés cheso es una variante del an:Aragonés ozidental, puedes navegar por las plantillas de variedades del aragonés, incluyendo las extintas, como el an:Chodigoaragonés, an:Romanze nabarro y el an:Riochán precastellán. --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 18:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Al no hablar inglés no veo claro cuál parece ser el problema, pero creo entender en la página de discusión de Ribagorçan que no se ve clara la situación del ribagorzano en el catalán y en el aragonés. Es decir, la distinción entre an:Aragonés ribagorzano y an:Catalán ribagorzano. Además, no se entienden las influencias del occitano en el aragonés, especialmente del gascón. Tal vez te ayude saber del an:Oczitán zisperinenco y de la intensa presencia occitana en Aragón, con sus occitanismos (an:Oczitanismo (lingüistica)). Es un tema que se puede entrever en mi blog (especialmente cuado hablo de apellidos occitanos) y del que he tratado ampliamente en mi lista de correo sobre Historia y Cultura de Aragón. Para más detalles, no dudes en consultar también a an:Usuario:Willtron y an:Usuario:EBRO. Ebro es nuestro especialista en lengua aragonesa, y Will también puede serte de ayuda. Lo dicho, pregunta lo que sea necesario, es un placer contestar. --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 19:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sociedad para el Estudio del Andaluz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on De Lingua Aragonensi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:53, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sociedad para el Estudio del Andaluz, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sociedad para el Estudio del Andaluz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Nabalese. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The removal of the proposed merge tag was not explained. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeneme. You have new messages at ConcernedVancouverite's talk page.
Message added 16:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Veo que te lo quieren borrar todo, desde De Lingva Aragonensi hasta el nabalés... Lo primero, te aconsejaría (creo que en la wikipedia en inglés también se usan con profusión) una plantilla general de los dialectos del aragonés y sus subdialectos. De ese modo no estaría huérfano, que es una de las críticas que te hacen. Segundo, te aconejaría que empezases a hacer artículos de dialectos, dejando para luego los subdialectos. Tercero, le dejo a Will y Ebro el enlace para que intervengan y aporten referencias, que ellos se mueven bien con el inglés. --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 17:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parece que está bien, pero te sigo aconsejando que sustituyas ribagorzano, cheso, etc, por aragonés ribagorzano, aragonés cheso, etc, para no usar los meros gentilicios. De paso, he comentado el tema con los compañeros que hablan inglés, aunque hoy hay precisamente un taller de biquipedia en una asociación de aragonés, como puedes ver aquí y estarán casi todos allí... --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cambia de paso Nabarro por Navarrese... --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 18:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Jeneme, Manuel me ha contado el problema que tienes. Vengo a coincidir con él en que sería mejor que trasladases las entradas a "Cheso aragonese", "Ribagorçan aragonese" etc. porque hacen más explícito de qué se está hablando. De paso quiero sugerirte que en el caso del "nabalés" lo escribas navalese, con V, puesto que el nombre del municipio (y por ello también su gentilicio) se escribe con V en español y hoy por hoy éste es el único topónimo oficial, siendo respetado con esa ortografía en todas las wikipedias (incluyendo ésta, como puedes ver aquí). Además, la escritura con B en aragonés es meramente una cuestión de convención ortográfica (en el alfabeto del aragonés, actualmente, no se reconoce la V) pero esa situación podría cambiar en un futuro próximo con la revisión de dichas normas ortográficas. Por todos esos motivos te aconsejo que lo pongas con V. Te he revisado además la plantilla de dialectos y te he cambiado el Gistaín aragonese por Chistau valley aragonese porque el adjetivo aragonés chistabín no sólo hace referencia al natural del municipio de Gistaín sino que también suele usarse para cualquier habitante de su valle (el valle de Chistau, que además incluye los municipios de San Juan de Plan y Plan, donde también lo hablan). Un saludo, y a ver si conseguimos conservar los artículos! --Lascorz (talk) 08:50, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I removed a link to Fonz from your Fonz Aragonese article, because the Wikipedia article for Fonz can't possibly be the one your article should reference :) I was going to replace it with a piped redlink, indicating the need for an article about the Fonz in question, but I don't know whether it's a language, dialect, or something else. You might like to create a Fonz (language) or Fonz (dialect) article, or perhaps just insert the appropriate redlink into the Fonz Aragonese piece. All the best, Gonzonoir (talk) 13:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message - thanks for that! I've made a small edit to the first sentence of Fonz Aragonese to clarify a little. Gonzonoir (talk) 14:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No hay problema. Tu inglés es mucho mejor que mi español, ¡y mi aragonés de Fonz sin duda! Gonzonoir (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give País Leonés a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aragonese dialect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aragüés Aragonese, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Ice (talk) 07:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks.pngThanks for contributing this article! Herostratus (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Kastela Republic, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kastela Republic until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Please note that this is in no way a comment about the work you have done, but simply a reflection of the fact that we cannot cover every single group that seeks to declare themselves a micronation. Please also note that a lack of notability is not permanent; if events transpire that lead to the group in question receiving significant third-party attention, it may allow you to make a case for inclusion. Ckatz^chat_spy 19:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andalusian Spanish has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Calila e Dimna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Castile

Comarca de Almazán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Nolay

Fala language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Fernando II

Medieval Spanish literature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Castile

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aragonese dialects has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Hi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request.

A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old.

Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change "e17" to "e18" in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are "speakers" (the number of native speakers in all countries), "date" (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes "speakers2". Our convention has been to enter e.g. "1990 census" when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change "name=e17" to "name=e18" in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim).

Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the "speakers2" field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article.

Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the {{sigfig}} template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.)

Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway.

If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter "no date" in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to "e17", and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old.

The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of.

Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give!

— kwami (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on L'Ajuntaera pa la Plática, l'Esturrie y l'Escarculle la Llengua Murciana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:38, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]