Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Griffpatchers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 06:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I Drink Water n Cats! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 06:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:I Drink Water n Cats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Air on White (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I Drink Water n Cats, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 938749233, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/938749233.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 02:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:R/woosh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm UtherSRG. I noticed that you recently removed content from CAST (company) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. UtherSRG (talk) 11:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celtic Fractal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 15:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celtic Fractal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yknow what bruv just go ahead and delete it cuz i cant find any reliable sources I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 00:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It is unlikely that this number is notable. Please see WP:NUMBER for our notability guideline for numbers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1,978,419,655,660,313,589,123,979 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

gobonobo ^{+ c} 17:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1,978,419,655,660,313,589,123,979 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:I Drink Water n Cats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 01:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! While you may have good intentions, our user pages are used to tell people about ourselves, rather than having stories and writings written on them. See the relevant policy: WP:NOTWEBHOST. And more info about user pages: WP:USERPAGE. If you have any questions or need help, leave a message on my talk page. Thank you, and happy editing! :) Kurnahusa (talk) 01:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because it is a masterpiece. It is hilarious ("Siglum .. what is a siglum"; "Father .. he went to go get the milk"), filled with passion, love and only the finest of memes. This user is a tenured Wikipedian, having published the article Mahindwara (which, might I add, is on its way to become an FA). Wikipedia should stand up against the WP:FUNPOLICE and bad faith deletion nominations! 😡😡😡😡😡

Yours, NOT truly, --❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 01:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks bruddah I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 01:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because i edited the thing bru --I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 01:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i bet you won't reply to this in the next 3 days Qxva (talk) 23:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you betted wrongly I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 23:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the one you made a few hours ago Qxva (talk) 01:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok cool i guess I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:I Drink Water n Cats/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 13:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:I Drink Water n Cats/SECRET requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 13:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qxva randomly edited it so yeah go ahead and delete it I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh and btw https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahindwara&action=history I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

I Drink Water n Cats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Same as earlier appeal. The sources I found for the article (for 0xDEADBEEF): https://bioone.org/journals/american-malacological-bulletin/volume-35/issue-1/006.035.0106/Description-of-Pyropelta-elongata-sp-nov-Gastropoda-Pyropeltidae-from-a/10.4003/006.035.0106.short (BioOne.org) I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 23:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per discussion below. Please focus on making constructive contributions to the encyclopedia :) Feel free to reach out if you have any questions about our policies or need any help with editing. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I Drink Water n Cats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i thought that you could do random stuff in User:(user)/sandbox because, when Liz commented here a few months ago, they told me I could experiment in my sandbox, which was linked to User:I_Drink_Water_n_Cats/sandbox (i forgot how to access the real sandbox and i thought that that was the real sandbox). So this all stems from a misunderstanding, and you could delete User:I_Drink_Water_n_Cats/sandbox and the "secret" page. I WON'T DO IT AGAIN.I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

per below, I'm unable to consider an unblock request if you are unable to tell us what articles you want to edit if unblocked (this tells us why you want to return, and how you will edit constructively). Therefore I have to decline this appeal, sorry. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider telling us what constructive edits you plan to make when unblocked. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 11:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG already nominated those random user subpages, so I'm going to remove the link for User:I_Drink_Water_n_Cats/sandbox on the main page. Also, I will continue to fix actual articles on Wikipedia. I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nominated for speedy deletion, I meant I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Try to answer the question: what specific constructive edits (be a little more specific than actual articles) do you plan to make when unblocked? 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh wait when unblocked? well UtherSRG indefinitely blocked me so uh that might not be happening soon I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 19:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite blocks aren't infinite or permanent. It just means that it won't expire on its own. If you want to be unblocked, you have to request it as you did above, but this time you should describe (in more detail) a constructive edit that you want to make. jlwoodwa (talk) 17:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well heres an article ill likely edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyropelta_elongata. It has very few details and i was able to find more information on reliable sources so yeah. This article was created by GaneshBot or smth, which makes stub articles on random subjects. I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 13:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please reappeal and, if possible, specify the source you have found. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 12:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i reappealed I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the source is in the appeal I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 00:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG and 0xDeadbeef: I'd be inclined to give a second chance here, given the above unblock request (where they've now provided a source). Any objections to unblocking? Elli (talk | contribs) 20:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support unblocking also. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 23:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like it, but I won't stop it. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I Drink Water n Cats. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Griffpatchers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh man that was back when i added random stuff to wikipedia

its better deleted I Drink Water n Cats (talk) 12:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I Drink Water n Cats. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of Griffpatchers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]