Archives

Archive 1 / Archive 2 / Archive 3 / Archive 4 / Archive 5 / Archive 6 / Archive 7

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Many Questions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Many Questions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TipsyElephant (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Newsjack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG. Only trivial mentions in a few sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newsjack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsjack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TipsyElephant (talk) 00:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Killing the People Reincarnated into the Other World -Cheat Slayer- at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Killing the People Reincarnated into the Other World -Cheat Slayer- at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Killing the People Reincarnated into the Other World: Cheat Slayer at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just a note about your recent WP:CUTPASTE move from Killing the People Reincarnated into the Other World: Cheat Slayer to Cheat Slayer. It has been patched with a WP:HISTMERGE, but please read the notice here: Template:uw-c&pmove. — Goszei (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cheat Slayer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the manga Cheat Slayer ran for one chapter before it was cancelled? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Killing the People Reincarnated into the Other World -Cheat Slayer-. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cheat Slayer), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Media Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Media Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TipsyElephant (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who read Newshounds has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have found links to artbooks of Cardcaptor Sakura here,here and here but I am unable to check them because my license with Winzip ended. Can you check them? If you don't find the picture you mentioned, upload any find appropiate. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So Tokyo Babylon just got copyedited after a brief expansion. What do you think it should be nominated to GA? Talking to you since we've often interacting about Clamp series lately.Tintor2 (talk) 20:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Nominated. I think I have seen you in twitter. When it comes to the Clamp, it's a shame Chibiyuto and other sites didn't translate the books describing the second half of the series cos the second Syaoran and Watanuki kinda lack info about their handling. Only brief commentaries about how they think of the cloning. I hope your book gets published. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, for some reason the Tokyo Babylon lead says only Ohkawa and Mokona worked in the manga? I would revise it but I have no source about it.Tintor2 (talk) 23:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neat. Tokyo Babylon went GA too. Now from Clamp's works Cardcaptor Sakura, Tsubasa, X, Tokyo Babylon are GA. The Spanish article of xxxHolic is also an upgraded article but it kinda seems based on the English based on the reviews so I don't know what stuff it might need besides a copyedit.Tintor2 (talk) 20:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can barely remember Yasha's twist but I don't see the need for a character list as long as the articles only focus on the typical information just like Tokyo Babylon has. I did the same with To Your Eternity as the series has several characters but don't last too much. My first language is actually Spanish which is why I asked you help with Tokyo Babylon after the copyedit and before nominating it.Tintor2 (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After I managed to expand Yuko Ichihara, I requested a copyedit since it never became GA. Feel free to edit anything about it.Tintor2 (talk) 21:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If something is missing from Yuko's article I would say it involves commentary from Colleen Clinkenbeard in regards to how she voiced her. When I was searching for a review I think I must have seen you but I don't wanna specify since private life is private.Tintor2 (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then I was wrong. However, avoid crediting Wikipedia considering how this place lists itself as unreliable.Tintor2 (talk) 21:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. By any chance have you seen reviews about the sequels of Tsubasa and xxxHolic? I've been wondering if it's possible to make an article for them like Clear Card but I haven't found too much commentary other than the French website Manganews. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 04:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You think that the original Syaoran (Tsubasa) counts as a category for fictional avatars for absorbing the magic feather of his clone? Not sure if that make him such category.Tintor2 (talk) 20:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way. Sorry for not being able to help with RG Veda but I would suggest using Tokyo Babylon#Reception for the article. I normally suggest using a paragraph for the narrative, one for the art, and a third if there is something noteworthy for the reviews. For example, in Tsubasa's case it is the second half of the manga, in X's case is the focus of the Dragons, etc, Tokyo Babylon's ending, etc. Paraphrasing is also helpful to avoid quoting..Tintor2 (talk) 21:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sex Ed 120%, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that critics complained about the manga Sex Ed 120% being given a "mature" rating by its English-language publisher? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sex Ed 120%. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sex Ed 120%), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,939 views (578.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 01:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Syaoran Li, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Syaoran Li (cosplayer pictured) from the manga Cardcaptor Sakura formed the basis of two characters in a later manga; one original and one clone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Syaoran Li. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Syaoran Li), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yuko Ichihara was just copyedited but I wanted to let you know before any nomination. Feel free to edit anything. I never thought about but Yuko also wears multiple outifts so I have no idea what's the best image for her.Tintor2 (talk) 18:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2020 song "Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt" spawned a sequel in 2021: "Boris Johnson Is Still a Fucking Cunt"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boris Johnson Is A Fucking Cunt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 21,693.5 views (903.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the museum of curiosity

Thank you for quality articles with a sense of comedy such as Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt, Truthiness, Green Wing (series 1), The Museum of Curiosity, Stephen Fry's Podgrams and Sex Ed 120%, in a long career here, for uploading related images - Ian, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2685 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

gerda has some subtle methods of weighing in :) well-deserved, ISD. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, ISD! The list you nominated, List of Yuri on Ice episodes, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all congratulations with bringing Yuri on Ice's list to FL. Sadly, none of the Clamp books I have are based on the anime series. I only found sources for the X anime and the OVAs of Tsubasa and xxxHolic. If possible I would suggest a search through AnimateTimes, WebNewtype or AnimeAnime.Tintor2 (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Truthiness for a featured article review here. You had nominated it for Featured article candidacy just few 15 years ago. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyell Gold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyell Gold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cat Burglar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the interactive cartoon Cat Burglar takes about 15 minutes to watch, but features 90 minutes of animation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cat Burglar (Netflix). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cat Burglar), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,478 views (539.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work!

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Truck-kun, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a common way to travel to another world is to be hit by a truck? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Truck-kun. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Truck-kun), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 00:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,548 views (647.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats with the book.Tintor2 (talk) 02:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• whistling* Now that would be interesting. Since I remember Anime News Network promoting the Kickstarter, I guess it counts as a reliable source.Tintor2 (talk) 19:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest it might be helpful to expand small articles. There was once a Tokyo Babylon liveaction but it was so obscure that I barely found a source about it. Maybe it helps to expand character articles in regards to themes or reception.Tintor2 (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ozy and Millie has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack (webcomic), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack (webcomic) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prince Andrew Is a Sweaty Nonce, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the band behind two expletive-laden UK top-five singles about Boris Johnson released a follow-up about Prince Andrew? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Prince Andrew Is A Sweaty Nonce. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Prince Andrew Is a Sweaty Nonce), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos for my first laugh of the day. Well done! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ISD (talk) 08:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's almost there, and props for what you've done so far! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ISD,

Congratulations the the GA.

What are your feelings about "Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt" should be split into two articles, "Boris Johnson Is a Fucking Cunt", and "Boris Johnson Is Still a Fucking Cunt" as they are two different songs. I've noticed that they have a new single out "Fuck Off Boris You Cunt". Hopefully this will be the last time we ever hear of Johnson (probably won't be though). SethWhales ^talk 06:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Seth Whales Hi there. If someone wants to split the articles into two/three entries they can do, although there appears to be little press for "Fuck Off Boris You Cunt" so I don't know if there is enough for an article there. The problem is that I'm personally busy right now and won't have the time myself to make any such articles. If you want to do so, you can do. Personally, I'd rather see the current article get up to FA status, and try to get it onto the main page for this Christmas, when chances are Kunt will have released a new song, most likely about LadBaby. ISD (talk) 06:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I just created the article Akito Hyuga from Code Geass and while there is sufficient information about his creation, I couldn't find anything about Clamp's commentaries about making him. By any chance do you know of a source? I also tried expanding Saya Kisaragi from Blood-C too if that interests you. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tintor2 I will let you know if I spot anything. ISD (talk) 20:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I just nominated Ichizu/Sakayume to GA. It's my first time writing a music article so feel free to review or just revise it.Tintor2 (talk) 21:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. ISD (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations with the book. I read the Anime News Network review. You plan to expand one of Clamp's articles with the book?Tintor2 (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Thanks for reading the review, I hope you will read the book too. I wrote on the WP:ANIME talk apge in a section " Is my book about CLAMP a reliable source?" to see if it is OK to use. Obviously, it would be easier if someone else reference my work rather than myself in terms of reliability. ISD (talk) 07:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Dongle of Donald Trefusis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:GNG. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Image StephenFry DongleOfDonaldTrefusis Background.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hold on Tight! (Inside No. 9), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that crew members had to sign non-disclosure agreements to stop them revealing that the Inside No. 9 episode "Hold on Tight!" was fake? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hold on Tight! (Inside No. 9). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hold on Tight! (Inside No. 9)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ISD. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Yuri on Ice episodes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 21. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vestal Masturbation T-shirt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the heavy metal band Cradle of Filth released a T-shirt that was so offensive that several people were arrested for wearing it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vestal Masturbation T-shirt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vestal Masturbation T-shirt), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,305 views (1,358.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Breakaway (game show) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2019

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When writing for the article Koyomi Araragi, I noticed several comments in reddit that claim that Nisio Isin was inspired by Watanuki and Yuko when writing Nekomonogatari. He even wrote a xxxHolic novel where the characterization of Watanuki was closer to Araragi's but still couldn't find any source confirming it in order to add more real world information. Cheers. Tintor2 (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've put a post on my Twitter account about this to see if I can get any more information about this. ISD (talk) 10:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Breakaway titles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kouichirou Itou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kouichirou Itou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

... discospinster _talk 20:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I'm planning to nominate Lelouch Lamperouge in the future thanks to having found more creation stuff. Since Clamp designed him, I wonder if you could provide anything you know. A lot of people say he looks like Kamui from X but it's just a rumor for now. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll see what I can do regarding Lelouch. ISD (talk) 06:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did come across this article from Comic Book Resources which mentions the comparison between Lelouch and Kamui, but I personally have my doubts as to how reliable a source CBR is. ISD (talk) 15:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ComicBookResources tends to be reliable but that delivery sure seems a bit random. Still, feel free to revise Lelouch's article if you are interested. Tintor2 (talk) 19:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have already given it a bit of look over, but I'm happy to give it closer examination again at some point. ISD (talk) 08:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of Arms of Other World Kingdom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article QI News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QI News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kugelmugel seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. GiantSnowman 14:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Museum of Curiosity has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vestal Masturbation T-shirt you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Vestal Masturbation T-shirt for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Following a recent discussion regarding TV season FLs, I've been working through current FLs to determine how such lists may better be covered. Currently, Green Wing series 1 is a FL; the general consensus from the discussion would seem to support renominating it at GAN to emphasize article/prose qualities over standalone list qualities. However, given that Green Wing had a short run, I personally think a standalone series 1 article may be unnecessary, and I'm considering a merge proposal for the series 1 and 2 articles into the main Green Wing article or to a single list of episodes.

As the original FL nominator, I thought I'd ask for your input first before starting a wider merge discussion – please let me know what you think. RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have no problem with the articles being merged. I think it best to do a list of all the episodes rather than putting them on the main article. I'm not sure how you would cover the special and the recent audio series. ISD (talk) 07:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I think the best way to resolve those questions is to go through a merge discussion and see what others have to say. I'll open one shortly at Talk:Green Wing. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have started the discussion at Talk:Green Wing#Merge discussion for Green Wing series 1 and series 2; please feel free to comment there. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. ISD (talk) 05:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Contest has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Serious About Comedy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable radio show; lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Only refs found in Google are mere mentions or are BBC links, which are not independent of subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mongrels.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]